JB/159/270/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/159/270/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/159/270/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/270/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/270/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>158)</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>CRIT. JUR. CRIM.</head></p>
 
<p>are so well known to the learned world <del>ventured to set</del> <add>in a small tract<lb/>
 
on the foundations of Civil Society</add> entitled "<lb/>
 
<del>ventured</del> first of any English writer that I know of<lb/>
to set up the same standard.  In the work of Helvetius,<lb/>
along with the admirable principle <del>above</del>, that<lb/>
mentioned, are blended some singular and perhaps<lb/>
untenable opinions <add>positions</add>.  These opinions which have no<lb/>
necessary connexion whatever with the above principle<lb/>
seem to have given an <unclear>invincible</unclear> disgust to<lb/>
many classes of men, particularly to those of the religious<lb/>
class:  and seem to have co-operated pretty<lb/>
powerfully with a cause of a very different but<lb/>
more irresistible nature <del>but</del> in preventing the work<lb/>
from gaining <add>acquiring</add> much popularity in this country.<lb/>
The <del>boldness</del> boldness of sentiment, and liberality of<lb/>
disquisition which are so conspicuous in it.</p>
<p>These together with others which would be no  disrecommendation<lb/>
to it in this free country, procured it<lb/>
as might have been expected the censure of the ruling<lb/>
powers in the country <add>what give it birth,</add> in which it made its first<lb/>
appearance.  This circumstance could not but be a<lb/>
conclusive reason with a man of prudence in M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>
Beccaria's situation not to cite it.  What it could have<lb/>
been that <del>prevented</del> occasioned it's being past over in like<lb/>
silence by D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Priestly, whether a disgust to those<del>positions</del> <add>other</add><lb/>
<del>with which it stands con</del> <add>opinions that are to be found in it</add>, an unacquaintance<lb/>
with the work, or any other cause, I will not take upon me to determine.  <add>In the eyes of a philosopher to zealous in behalf of the interests of mankind</add> A principle of this importance, in<lb/>
which is contained implicitly every <add>political</add> truth in Legislation<lb/>
by which society can be the better, might have atoned<lb/>
<add>one</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

158)

CRIT. JUR. CRIM.

are so well known to the learned world ventured to set in a small tract
on the foundations of Civil Society
entitled "
ventured first of any English writer that I know of
to set up the same standard. In the work of Helvetius,
along with the admirable principle above, that
mentioned, are blended some singular and perhaps
untenable opinions positions. These opinions which have no
necessary connexion whatever with the above principle
seem to have given an invincible disgust to
many classes of men, particularly to those of the religious
class: and seem to have co-operated pretty
powerfully with a cause of a very different but
more irresistible nature but in preventing the work
from gaining acquiring much popularity in this country.
The boldness boldness of sentiment, and liberality of
disquisition which are so conspicuous in it.

These together with others which would be no disrecommendation
to it in this free country, procured it
as might have been expected the censure of the ruling
powers in the country what give it birth, in which it made its first
appearance. This circumstance could not but be a
conclusive reason with a man of prudence in Mr
Beccaria's situation not to cite it. What it could have
been that prevented occasioned it's being past over in like
silence by Dr Priestly, whether a disgust to thosepositions other
with which it stands con opinions that are to be found in it, an unacquaintance
with the work, or any other cause, I will not take upon me to determine. In the eyes of a philosopher to zealous in behalf of the interests of mankind A principle of this importance, in
which is contained implicitly every political truth in Legislation
by which society can be the better, might have atoned
one


Identifier: | JB/159/270/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

270

Info in main headings field

crit. jur. crim

Image

002

Titles

punishment / end / prefat. princ. of utility / improvement / mad houses / plan

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d157 / d158 / d159 / d160

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

54093

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in