JB/147/038/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/038/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/038/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/038/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><head>2.  The nature of the duty may have changed</head></p>
<p><!-- pencil -->8 March 1810<lb/>
<p><gap/>. Another patron <add>now</add> exists where fitness for the<lb/>
<head>Sinecures</head></p>
<p>2.  The nature of the duty may have changed</p>
<p><gap/>. Another patron <add>now</add> exists whose fitness for the<lb/>
passing <add>forming</add> of the judgment in question stands beyond dispute<lb/>
passing <add>forming</add> of the judgment in question stands beyond dispute<lb/>
as being built on the same ground.  No matter:  the<lb/>
as being built on the same ground.  No matter:  the<lb/>
person <del>by</del> whose judgment can not have been built on<lb/>
person <del>by</del> whose judgment can not have been built on<lb/>
sufficient grounds, he is the person by whom will the <unclear>claim</unclear>,<lb/>
sufficient grounds, he is the person by whose will the <unclear>claim</unclear>,<lb/>
the decision is to be determined:  the person the only one<lb/>
the decision is to be determined:  the person the only one<lb/>
of the <gap/> whose judgment can have been built on sufficient<lb/>
of the two whose judgment can have been built on sufficient<lb/>
grounds, he is the person by whose will the <lb/>
grounds, he is the person by whose will the <lb/>
<unclear>same</unclear> the decision is <hi rend="underline">not</hi> to be determined.</p>
choice the decision is <hi rend="underline">not</hi> to be determined.</p>
<p>But legislation is not thus an objective that <unclear>states</unclear><lb/>
<p>But legislation is not thus an objective that strikes<lb/>
and with equal <unclear>force</unclear> against legislation itself?  every<lb/>
and with equal force against legislation itself?  every<lb/>
on who legislates is it not for <unclear>festivity</unclear>, for contingent<lb/>
one who legislates is it not for futurity, for contingent<lb/>
<unclear>Rewards</unclear> that he legislates?</p>
futurity that he legislates?</p>
 
<p>Most certainly:  but in legislation at any rate<lb/>
Most certainly:  but in legislation at any <unclear>rated</unclear><lb/>
in the common cause and with very few exceptions<lb/>
in the common cause and with very few exceptions<lb/>
indeed it is conducted, there is <del>always <add>a proportionately</add></del> a salvo<lb/>
indeed it is conducted, there is <del>always <add>a proportionately</add></del> a salvo<lb/>
a perpetually <gap/> and perfectly and universally<lb/>
a perpetually <unclear>commodious</unclear> and perfectly and universally<lb/>
understood salvo – for the powers of all future legislators.<lb/>
understood salvo – for the powers of all future legislators.<lb/>
If in legislation any attempt is ever made to get<lb/>
If in legislation any attempt is ever made to get<lb/>
rid of this salvo – the attempt thus made so be order<lb/>
rid of this salvo – the attempt thus made so be order<lb/>
matters that when dead they shall continue and <lb/>
matters that when dead they shall continue and <lb/>
by an <gap/> yet to <unclear>tyrannise</unclear> over the <gap/><lb/>
by an irremoveable yoke to tyrannise over the <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> <add><gap/></add> the same absurdity, and upon that indefinitely<lb/>
adopts <add><gap/></add> the same absurdity, and upon that indefinitely<lb/>
<gap/> scale
greater scale.</p>
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

8 March 1810
Sinecures

2. The nature of the duty may have changed

. Another patron now exists whose fitness for the
passing forming of the judgment in question stands beyond dispute
as being built on the same ground. No matter: the
person by whose judgment can not have been built on
sufficient grounds, he is the person by whose will the claim,
the decision is to be determined: the person the only one
of the two whose judgment can have been built on sufficient
grounds, he is the person by whose will the
choice the decision is not to be determined.

But legislation is not thus an objective that strikes
and with equal force against legislation itself? every
one who legislates is it not for futurity, for contingent
futurity that he legislates?

Most certainly: but in legislation at any rate
in the common cause and with very few exceptions
indeed it is conducted, there is always a proportionately a salvo
a perpetually commodious and perfectly and universally
understood salvo – for the powers of all future legislators.
If in legislation any attempt is ever made to get
rid of this salvo – the attempt thus made so be order
matters that when dead they shall continue and
by an irremoveable yoke to tyrannise over the
adopts the same absurdity, and upon that indefinitely
greater scale.


Identifier: | JB/147/038/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

9 continued, 11-12

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

038

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C4 / E5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49263

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in