JB/147/080/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/080/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><hi rend="underline"><del><gap/></del> Keep p.127.</hi> Any body that <unclear>glean</unclear> up <gap/>: the <gap/> is<lb/>
<p><hi rend="underline"><del><gap/></del> Keep p.127.</hi> Any body that <unclear>glean</unclear> up opinions: the point is<lb/>
to weigh and counterweigh the value of <gap/>.</p>
to weigh and counterweigh the value of <unclear>them</unclear>.</p>


<p>Syncopt<gap/> of copying ever abasement then of shunting</p>
<p>Symptoms of copying ever abasement then of shouting</p>


<p>Ch.4 Opinions of the Committee of 1807-8 concerning Reversionary <lb/>
<p>Ch.4 Opinions of the Committee of 1807-8 concerning Reversionary <lb/>
Line 12: Line 12:


<p><add>the other</add>On the subject of reversionary grants nor as<lb/>
<p><add>the other</add>On the subject of reversionary grants nor as<lb/>
the subject of Grants for Joint Laws do I find<add>have I found</add> <gap/><lb/>
the subject of Grants for Joint Lives do I find<add>have I found</add> any<lb/>
<add>pre<gap/> <gap/></add> opinion delivered by the Committee of 1797-8.</p>
<add><unclear>particular</unclear> number</add> opinion delivered by the Committee of 1797-8.</p>


<p><gap/> yet, <add>professedly on the subject of</add> so far as conscious grants for present<lb/>
<p>Nor yet, <add>professedly on the subject of</add> so far as conscious grants for present<lb/>
ever by the Committee of <gap/> 8.  But on the subject<lb/>
lives by the Committee of 1807-8.  But on the subject <note>B</note><lb/>
of Reversionary Grants I find a sort of argument<lb/>
of Reversionary Grants I find a sort of argument<lb/>
<gap/> and any such presents a claim to enter,</p>
pro and con which presents a claim to enter,</p>
 
<p>In property as conception is indistinct, expression<lb/>
is apt to be loose<add>lax</add> and changing.  <del>the same</del> names<lb/>
the man where things <add>different things are in vice</add> are different: <del>things the</del> different<lb/>
names employed where perhaps<add>probably</add> the same things whose <add>upon examination it appears probable that </add><lb/>
in view.</p>
 
The scene of the controversy lies in p. 127. In<lb/>
the <gap/> paragraph <add>has for its the declared subject matter the</add> <del>we have a string</del> of <del>objections</del><lb/>
business <add>case</add> of <add>nor</add><hi rend="underline">contingent interest:</hi> and appellation wide<lb/>
enough to include Grants for Joint Lives as well as<lb/>
Reversionary Grants.  In this paragraph certain objections<lb/>
are brought to view as applying to these contingent <note>view appear the chief</note><lb/>
interest.: objections &#x2014; <del>but</del> not however all that the <lb/>
Committee know of, but some only, viz. such as <add>in their</add>by their <add>view <del>was</del></add><lb/>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Keep p.127. Any body that glean up opinions: the point is
to weigh and counterweigh the value of them.

Symptoms of copying ever abasement then of shouting

Ch.4 Opinions of the Committee of 1807-8 concerning Reversionary
Grants

§.1

the otherOn the subject of reversionary grants nor as
the subject of Grants for Joint Lives do I findhave I found any
particular number opinion delivered by the Committee of 1797-8.

Nor yet, professedly on the subject of so far as conscious grants for present
lives by the Committee of 1807-8. But on the subject B
of Reversionary Grants I find a sort of argument
pro and con which presents a claim to enter,

In property as conception is indistinct, expression
is apt to be looselax and changing. the same names
the man where things different things are in vice are different: things the different
names employed where perhapsprobably the same things whose upon examination it appears probable that
in view.

The scene of the controversy lies in p. 127. In
the paragraph has for its the declared subject matter the we have a string of objections
business case of norcontingent interest: and appellation wide
enough to include Grants for Joint Lives as well as
Reversionary Grants. In this paragraph certain objections
are brought to view as applying to these contingent view appear the chief
interest.: objections — but not however all that the
Committee know of, but some only, viz. such as in theirby their view was




Identifier: | JB/147/080/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

080

Info in main headings field

Sinecures &c

Image

001

Titles

Ch. 4 Opinions of the Committee of 1807-8 concerning Reversionary Grants

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D1 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49305

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in