JB/147/087/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/087/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/087/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/087/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<note>Reversion <lb/>
1807-8 Opinion<lb/>
14<lb/>
Reason 4. Tendency<lb/>
to persistant <gap/><lb/>
p<gap/> and <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> <gap/></note>
<p>4. "And it may further be urged that anticipation of<lb/>
"this sort and to perpetuate inefficient plans, and to<lb/>
"render any alterations and regulations less effectual <lb/>
"and more distinct which the wisdom of Parliament<lb/>
"may think fit to adapt with regard to them."</p>
<note>15<lb/>
Of <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
J.B. <gap/> <gap/> <lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/></note><lb/>
<p><unclear>A</unclear> True: so it may be urged: and so, as the<lb/>
reader may have been, it has been endeavoured to<lb/>
be urged and with <add>a form</add> a degree of force which in intention<lb/>
at least may be found <unclear>somewhat</unclear> <add>to go in some degree beyond </add> to exceed that with<lb/>
which it is urged here.</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>A <del>dash</del> <add>Between</add> The case of an inefficient plan and the<lb/>
case of an efficient plan the difference it should seem right<lb/>
to have been distinctly and clearly marked out.</p>


<p>An inefficient plan is synonymous <add>to</add>is at least in<lb/>
point of mischievousness and ripeness for abolition upon a<lb/>
par with a Sinecure.  Thus far <add>neither</add> alteration and regulation <lb/>
is <add><gap/> any application</add> out of the question, abolition is the remedy<lb/>
and the only <del><gap/></del> remedy and here the mischief is that <lb/>
in proportion in the value of the portion contingent interest is great <add>ann<gap/>uld</add> <note>abolition is rendered<lb/>
them expensive, and<lb/>
<gap/> and difficulty</note></p>
<p>It is an efficient plan and to those above that <lb/>
alteration and regulation <unclear>have</unclear> and the <gap/>tion founded<lb/>
in the eventual Demand for those <add>such</add> operations have any<lb/>
application.</p>
<p>But the great mischief is that, <add>be the office what it may</add> the <add>fail if its being</add> <del>existence of</del><lb/>
<add>the subject of</add> any such grants <add>grant</add> in contingency is <del><gap/></del><add>a cause and thence </add> a sign of <del><gap/></del> its<lb/>
<del><gap/></del><add>either</add> being already or soon and to a certainty about to be a<lb/>
sinecure.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit Reversion
1807-8 Opinion
14
Reason 4. Tendency
to persistant
p and

4. "And it may further be urged that anticipation of
"this sort and to perpetuate inefficient plans, and to
"render any alterations and regulations less effectual
"and more distinct which the wisdom of Parliament
"may think fit to adapt with regard to them."

15
Of
J.B.

A True: so it may be urged: and so, as the
reader may have been, it has been endeavoured to
be urged and with a form a degree of force which in intention
at least may be found somewhat to go in some degree beyond to exceed that with
which it is urged here.

A dash Between The case of an inefficient plan and the
case of an efficient plan the difference it should seem right
to have been distinctly and clearly marked out.

An inefficient plan is synonymous tois at least in
point of mischievousness and ripeness for abolition upon a
par with a Sinecure. Thus far neither alteration and regulation
is any application out of the question, abolition is the remedy
and the only remedy and here the mischief is that
in proportion in the value of the portion contingent interest is great annuld abolition is rendered
them expensive, and
and difficulty

It is an efficient plan and to those above that
alteration and regulation have and the tion founded
in the eventual Demand for those such operations have any
application.

But the great mischief is that, be the office what it may the fail if its being existence of
the subject of any such grants grant in contingency is a cause and thence a sign of its
either being already or soon and to a certainty about to be a
sinecure.



Identifier: | JB/147/087/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

14-16

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

087

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D8 / E8

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49312

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in