JB/147/413/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/413/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/413/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/413/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/413/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->8 March 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Sinecures</head></p>
 
<p>The <del>sep</del> article which <del>follow immediately after</del><lb/>
 
intervening between one article and the next of those which<lb/>
 
have in a line with them a set of figures <del>under</del> in he<lb/>
Column marked N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of Papers – <add>for of</add> these articles <add>all of them</add>, (did I say?)<lb/>
the <del>infor</del> authority is to be found in the <unclear>first</unclear> of <del>such</del> the<lb/>
two papers there referred to.  Alas! this conjecture<lb/>
were but a <gap/> aught at in the moment of perplexity<lb/>
and distress.  In some instances it may <del>pre</del> <add>might</add><lb/>
I still suppose <add>and hope</add> be found conformable to the truth.<lb/>
But others there are (who can say in what number?)<lb/>
in which assuredly no support would be to be found for<lb/>
it.</p>
<p>Take for example Appendix N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 79 Ireland N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 2<lb/>
Article Comptroller of Dublin Port <del>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> Under</del> <add>In</add> the Column<lb/>
headed by the words N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of Paper, figures standing in a<lb/>
line with this article are 767.  But <add>next</add> after it come<lb/>
articles, 10 in number those which, the first excepted<lb/>
nothing <del>could be</del> <add>soever</add> more unlikely than that they should<lb/>
have been included in the same paper in a list of<lb/>
papers thus numerous, and of which this N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> is not<lb/>
the last.  A Constable of a Castle, a Keeper of a<lb/>
Chapel, a Secretary to the Post Office, a Clerk of the Peace<lb/>
for a pair of Counties &amp;c <add>of</add> Offices thus disparate can it<lb/>
be conceived that the information sent in should have<lb/>
come from the same office, and received its authentication<lb/>
from the same signature?</p>
<p><unclear>Well</unclear> and the next N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> where at last it comes: – what<lb/>
is it? – why, it is the same N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of the self same N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>, repeated.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:05, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

8 March 1810
Sinecures

The sep article which follow immediately after
intervening between one article and the next of those which
have in a line with them a set of figures under in he
Column marked No of Papers – for of these articles all of them, (did I say?)
the infor authority is to be found in the first of such the
two papers there referred to. Alas! this conjecture
were but a aught at in the moment of perplexity
and distress. In some instances it may pre might
I still suppose and hope be found conformable to the truth.
But others there are (who can say in what number?)
in which assuredly no support would be to be found for
it.

Take for example Appendix No 79 Ireland No 2
Article Comptroller of Dublin Port No Under In the Column
headed by the words No of Paper, figures standing in a
line with this article are 767. But next after it come
articles, 10 in number those which, the first excepted
nothing could be soever more unlikely than that they should
have been included in the same paper in a list of
papers thus numerous, and of which this No is not
the last. A Constable of a Castle, a Keeper of a
Chapel, a Secretary to the Post Office, a Clerk of the Peace
for a pair of Counties &c of Offices thus disparate can it
be conceived that the information sent in should have
come from the same office, and received its authentication
from the same signature?

Well and the next No where at last it comes: – what
is it? – why, it is the same No of the self same No, repeated.


Identifier: | JB/147/413/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

413

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E4

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

49638

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in