JB/109/012/001

Click Here To Edit

erutative

1. To prevent difficultate invention
and thence by dispair of
successful invention a producer pre
mendacityveracity.

1. Answers suddenimmediate shewn
unpremeditated

2. Questions one by one,
correspondent answers to
each, before answer is known

3. Questions grounded further
answers.

4. Depositions mutually concealed

II. Do and to draw out
the whole statement - that
part which is more favourable to
the invoking party, as
well as a caution.

5. Cross-Examination.
This first?

N.B. This fails when the
witness is an unworthy one.
1. of between Witness by
adverse party ext
II do means as before and
in perception

6. Of witness, by adverse
witness a really
prition.

7. The abuse in prevention
Arranguments } justices }to for personality
the }same or to ends by
III. The affordg {the a known chance of
correctionsubsequent{ or detection
by other {ulterior evidence
and to afford the clearer ground
and for ground} a prosecution
in case } of mendacity

8. Registration of the testimony.

—

9. Recollections revisal.

(This also as a remedy
against so {incorrectness)
1.firm right of the
other evidence

2. After do.

—

10. Publicity of examination. — This as a check
upon the Registration
to insure its correctness &
veracity.

—

11. Publication of evidence
— when it is worthwhile:
This both insures
correctness of registration
and gains the requisite
confirmation to persons
capable of furnishing
evidence.

---page break---

Scrutation

be a dd

1. No person In England <add>No use</add>of collector
-lations - therefore as
need of the remedy

2. Judges compleatly
exposed to the public
eye.

In France as danger

In England, some

---page break---

30 May 1803

Ordo of preferability
in casual evidence

1. Parol scrutinized cross examine<add>cross examined</add>
registered minuted with opportunity
of contation

2. Written judicially
uttered and with oppor
uttered.

3. Parol uncross examined
but minuted

34. Written extra-judicially
uttered -
N.B. Parol extrajudicially
uttered
as Hearsay

45. Hearsay evidence
Questions as to each
1. W In what cases
inadmissible
2. In what admissible
3. Degree of credit

Modification in each

1. Self evidence

2. defen Evidence of
witness corrected with
Self

3. Dift evidence

4. do of witness connected
with Dif:t

II. In penuli

II. In penuli

1. Best to what not
applicable definition

2. Best evidence
persuasive in that which
ought to be and will be
if &c

2

—

3. Characters of best evidence

345 1Rank of species of
evidence according to
more characters.

56. Order of discussion
different.

—

6a. What perfections depend on the
legislation what not.

—

Non sequitur because
this is the part that not
others Bond to rewards

—

Butlers definition of
"best evidence, the same
as rts?

—

Under each kind of
inferior evidence indication
of the cases in
which and uses to which
if they be employed
ex gr. Indicative.

2. Antient facts.

Cases where the best and
not be employed

1. Vexation, delay &
expences. [+] [+] In Courts of Conscience
registration omitted by
reason of the expence.
---page break---

Ordo of preferability
in casual evidence

1. Parol cross-examined
and judiciallyminuted

2. Written judicial

3. Parol un cross examined
but minuted

4. Written extrajudicial

5. Hearsay Evidence.

—

Goodness depends on

1.

2. Mode of examination extraction

Judges employ a mode
which they recognize to be
bad + and yet they reach
from the party the best evidence!

—

Characters of perfection
in evidence

1. Immediateness

2

2. Originality

3. Presumable veracity2

2

4. Trudness

3

5. Permanence

7 Compleatness belongs to the
whole mass - not to each piece.

Conj

Varanda

1. First hand with

2. Real with personal

3. Preappointed with in fact

3. Official with Unofficial

4. Direct with circumstantial

4. The evidence of one
sort of person with
that of another

Shape

Simplified

51. Untized with

scrutinized, and
less more perfectly
with less perfectly

62 permanent with impermanent

7.3 Original with unoriginal.

Evidence uncomparable

1. Written extrajudicial
with lking .

—

---page break---

Best

Ends of comparison

1. To choose the best
Draft.

2.3<add>2.</add> In case of opposition
to judge which is most
persuasive

3.2.<add>2</add>
In case of conjunction
and redundancy
to judge which shall
be discarded.

So many deation &c
operations so many degrees
in the scales of goodness
of evidence.

—

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/109/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109.
Date_1	1803-05-30	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	109	Main Headings	Evidence
Folio number	012	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles	Scrutation / Ordo & preferability
Category	Rudiments sheet (brouillon)	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks	1800
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1800
Notes public		ID Number	35667
Box Contents