JB/078/073/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:06, 20 October 2023

1826 Aug 24 or 18

Review of Humphrey's Code

§ Conclusion
Objections to H. obviated

§. Objections obviated

In vain would an objection say - be a non
matter uncertainly and so forth

Objections none to
H. but what would
apply with greater
force to the established
practice

The question is - first as to the anpeaster degree: of uncertainty
as constant with the present practice

2. as to the comparative facility if correct as taken the
new plansystem and the present practice.

Identifier: \| JB/078/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.
Date_1	1826-08-18	Marginal Summary Numbering	Not numbered
Box	078	Main Headings	Review of Humphreys
Folio number	073	Info in main headings field	Review of Humphreys's Code
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25164
Box Contents

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 <p>In vain would an objection say - <unclear>be a non</unclear> <gap/><lb/>
 <gap/> <gap/> matter uncertainly and so forth</p>
-<note><!-- Pencil note -->Objection none to<lb/>
+<note><!-- Pencil note -->Objections none to<lb/>
 H. but what would<lb/>
 apply with greater<lb/>
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}