JB/078/126/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/078/126/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 23<lb/>Review of Humphreys</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>&sect; Fundamental Principle</note><lb/>2) (2<lb/>Note C ??</p> <p><note>Note<lb/>Unhappily the nature<lb/>of things and the established<lb/>language <unclear>oppose</unclear> an unsurmountable<lb/>bar to any<lb/>determinate law of demarcation<lb/>between them.</note></p> <p><del>All</del> These several benefits have all <add>every one</add> of them presented<lb/>themselves as belonging to the list of objects in the possession<lb/>of which <del>ha</del> the maximum of happiness depends, and<lb/>to one or the other of them it is believed will be found <sic>refusable</sic><lb/>every circumstance capable of being contributory to this<lb/>effect.  Unhappily the nature of things <add>the case</add> and the <sic>unperfection</sic><lb/>of language <sic>concurr</sic> in <unclear>opposing</unclear> an unsurmountable bar<lb/>to the drawing of any determinate law of demarcation<lb/>between one of them and another.</p> <p><del>Security</del> <add>In the order if</add> subsistence ranks before abundance &#x2014; subsistence be<lb/>all before abundance for a few &#x2014; <add>abundance for all being impossible</add> subsistence, abundance and security<lb/>before equality, <add><del>Subsistence and abundance are</del></add> But <del>abundance</del> to the whole consciousness <add>taken</add> in<lb/>the aggregate <del>at</del> security for subsistence is in proportion<lb/>to abundance.</p> <p>Subsistence and abundance <del>and eq</del> <add>the care of these benefits the provision made</add> these being <del><gap/></del><lb/><add>more <gap/> to</add> the field of political economy, of equality, to the constitutional<lb/>branch of law; of security to the civil or say non-penal<lb/>and penal branches of law.</p> <p>Security is <add>divisible according to the several instruments and</add> as against the <add>several</add> causes of insecurity<lb/><del>in relation</del> to which it bears reference.</p> <p><del>Causes of insec It bears <gap/></del></p> <p>In regard to security sources <add>points</add> of distinction and <gap/><lb/>are as follows<lb/>1. the <del>par</del> <!-- brackets in pencil --> [benefits or say possession or say] source of happiness<lb/>to which it applies: to wit to <unclear>timber</unclear> or wealth <add> in its several modifications</add>: 2<lb/>power <del><gap/> The <gap/></del> reputation or say good repute.</p>
<head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 23<lb/>Review of Humphreys</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>&sect; Fundamental Principle</note><lb/>2) (2<lb/>Note C ??</p> <p><note>Note<lb/>Unhappily the nature<lb/>of things and the established<lb/>language <unclear>oppose</unclear> an unsurmountable<lb/>bar to any<lb/>determinate law of demarcation<lb/>between them.</note></p> <p><del>All</del> These several benefits have all <add>every one</add> of them presented<lb/>themselves as belonging to the list of objects in the possession<lb/>of which <del>ha</del> the maximum of happiness depends, and<lb/>to one or the other of them it is believed will be found <sic>refusable</sic><lb/>every circumstance capable of being contributory to this<lb/>effect.  Unhappily the nature of things <add>the case</add> and the <sic>unperfection</sic><lb/>of language <sic>concurr</sic> in <unclear>opposing</unclear> an unsurmountable bar<lb/>to the drawing of any determinate law of demarcation<lb/>between one of them and another.</p> <p><del>Security</del> <add>In the order if</add> subsistence ranks before abundance &#x2014; subsistence be<lb/>all before abundance for a few &#x2014; <add>abundance for all being impossible</add> subsistence, abundance and security<lb/>before equality, <add><del>Subsistence and abundance are</del></add> But <del>abundance</del> to the whole consciousness <add>taken</add> in<lb/>the aggregate <del>at</del> security for subsistence is in proportion<lb/>to abundance.</p> <p>Subsistence and abundance <del>and eq</del> <add>the care of these benefits the provision made</add> these being <del><gap/></del><lb/><add>more particularly to</add> the field of political economy, of equality, to the constitutional<lb/>branch of law; of security to the civil or say non-penal<lb/>and penal branches of law.</p> <p>Security is <add>divisible according to the several instruments and</add> as against the <add>several</add> causes of insecurity<lb/><del>in relation</del> to which it bears reference.</p> <p><del>Causes of insec It bears <gap/></del></p> <p>In regard to security sources <add>points</add> of distinction and <gap/><lb/>are as follows<lb/>1. the <del>par</del> <!-- brackets in pencil --> [benefits or say possession or say] source of happiness<lb/>to which it applies: to wit to <unclear>timber</unclear> or wealth <add> in its several modifications</add>: 2<lb/>power <del><gap/> The <gap/></del> reputation or say good repute.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:06, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1826. Octr. 23
Review of Humphreys

§ Fundamental Principle
2) (2
Note C ??

Note
Unhappily the nature
of things and the established
language oppose an unsurmountable
bar to any
determinate law of demarcation
between them.

All These several benefits have all every one of them presented
themselves as belonging to the list of objects in the possession
of which ha the maximum of happiness depends, and
to one or the other of them it is believed will be found refusable
every circumstance capable of being contributory to this
effect. Unhappily the nature of things the case and the unperfection
of language concurr in opposing an unsurmountable bar
to the drawing of any determinate law of demarcation
between one of them and another.

Security In the order if subsistence ranks before abundance — subsistence be
all before abundance for a few — abundance for all being impossible subsistence, abundance and security
before equality, Subsistence and abundance are But abundance to the whole consciousness taken in
the aggregate at security for subsistence is in proportion
to abundance.

Subsistence and abundance and eq the care of these benefits the provision made these being
more particularly to the field of political economy, of equality, to the constitutional
branch of law; of security to the civil or say non-penal
and penal branches of law.

Security is divisible according to the several instruments and as against the several causes of insecurity
in relation to which it bears reference.

Causes of insec It bears

In regard to security sources points of distinction and
are as follows
1. the par [benefits or say possession or say] source of happiness
to which it applies: to wit to timber or wealth in its several modifications: 2
power The reputation or say good repute.




Identifier: | JB/078/126/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-10-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

126

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

Note ( ) ?

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

ID Number

25217

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in