★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 23<lb/>Review of Humphreys.</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>§. Fundamental principles</note><lb/>(4) (4</p> <p><note>Precluded by subjects<lb/>it belongs not to this<lb/>but the penal code</note></p> <p> | <head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 23<lb/>Review of Humphreys.</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>§. Fundamental principles</note><lb/>(4) (4</p> <p><note>Precluded by subjects<lb/>it belongs not to this<lb/>but the penal code</note></p> <p>In so far as it is the result of the agency of persons<lb/><del><gap/></del> acting in the character of subjects it belongs not to<lb/>this Code: the branch of law to which it belongs is <add>the the civil and</add> the<lb/>penal.</p> <p><note>Produced by rulers<lb/>it is the result of<lb/>want of appropriate aptitude<lb/>either moral or<lb/>intellectual</note></p> <p>It is in so far as it is the result of agency<lb/>of persons acting in the character of rulers that it belongs to the<lb/>present code</p> <p>Of rulers as such the agency may be productive<lb/>of insecurity in respect of unmovable property either through<lb/>a deficiency in respect of appropriate <add>moral</add> aptitude, or through<lb/>a deficiency in respect of appropriate intellectual aptitude.</p> <p><note><add>In so far as/Liable to be</add> Produced by want of<lb/><del><gap/></del> <add>appropriate</add> aptitude <add>in all shape</add> in<lb/>rulers the existence of<lb/>it <del><gap/></del> is the business of<lb/>constitutional law</note></p> <p>In so far as the insecurity is produced by a deficiency<lb/>in <del>mor</del> respect of <del>mo</del> appropriate moral aptitude<lb/>on the part of rulers, the arrangements adapted to the prevention <add>exclusion</add><lb/>of it belong to the constitutional branch of law. It is produced<lb/>by destruction or deterioration <add>of the value or</add> of the subject matter, or by transfer<lb/>of it to other hands in such sort that <add>by</add> the transfer the aggregate<lb/>of the happiness derivable from it is diminished.</p> <p><note><del>In so far as</del> produced<lb/><del>by rulers it is</del> produced</note></p> <p><note>The arrangements by<lb/>which diminution of happiness<lb/>is produced are either<lb/>those which belong to <unclear>substantive</unclear><lb/>or those which belong to constitutional<lb/>law and arise<lb/>from the distributive mode of<lb/><del><gap/></del> the <add>the unhappiness producing</add> pain which springs out <lb/>of the <unclear>nature</unclear> of wealth distributed</note></p> <p><note>So far as depend upon<lb/>the distribution of the wealth<lb/>when equality out of the [ ]<lb/> <!-- continues along the left hand edge of the page --> the question whatever unhappiness is produced is produced by violation of the <hi rend="underline">disappointment preventing principle</hi> ☞ <gap/> with <del>these</del> <unclear>his</unclear> words.</note></p> <p>In so far as it is produced by deficiency in respect<lb/>of appropriate intellectual aptitude on the part of rulers<lb/>it is produced by the want of such <add>these</add> arrangements by which<lb/>on the occasion of <del>all p</del> the passing of an immovable out<lb/>of the hands of a proprietor the pain <del><gap/></del> <unclear>bound to</unclear> <gap/><lb/>proceeding from <add>occasioned by</add> disappointment say <hi rend="underline">the pain of disappointment</hi><lb/>is produced. This design is, as it out to be, to minimize<lb/>the number of the instances in which this pain has place: but<lb/>for want of discerning and thence for want of employing the arrangements<lb/><add>best</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin --> best adapted to this<lb/>design they fail more<lb/>or less in their endeavours<lb/>for the accomplishment of it.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1826. Octr 23
Review of Humphreys.
§. Fundamental principles
(4) (4
Precluded by subjects
it belongs not to this
but the penal code
In so far as it is the result of the agency of persons
acting in the character of subjects it belongs not to
this Code: the branch of law to which it belongs is the the civil and the
penal.
Produced by rulers
it is the result of
want of appropriate aptitude
either moral or
intellectual
It is in so far as it is the result of agency
of persons acting in the character of rulers that it belongs to the
present code
Of rulers as such the agency may be productive
of insecurity in respect of unmovable property either through
a deficiency in respect of appropriate moral aptitude, or through
a deficiency in respect of appropriate intellectual aptitude.
In so far as/Liable to be Produced by want of
appropriate aptitude in all shape in
rulers the existence of
it is the business of
constitutional law
In so far as the insecurity is produced by a deficiency
in mor respect of mo appropriate moral aptitude
on the part of rulers, the arrangements adapted to the prevention exclusion
of it belong to the constitutional branch of law. It is produced
by destruction or deterioration of the value or of the subject matter, or by transfer
of it to other hands in such sort that by the transfer the aggregate
of the happiness derivable from it is diminished.
In so far as produced
by rulers it is produced
The arrangements by
which diminution of happiness
is produced are either
those which belong to substantive
or those which belong to constitutional
law and arise
from the distributive mode of
the the unhappiness producing pain which springs out
of the nature of wealth distributed
So far as depend upon
the distribution of the wealth
when equality out of the [ ]
the question whatever unhappiness is produced is produced by violation of the disappointment preventing principle ☞ with these his words.
In so far as it is produced by deficiency in respect
of appropriate intellectual aptitude on the part of rulers
it is produced by the want of such these arrangements by which
on the occasion of all p the passing of an immovable out
of the hands of a proprietor the pain bound to
proceeding from occasioned by disappointment say the pain of disappointment
is produced. This design is, as it out to be, to minimize
the number of the instances in which this pain has place: but
for want of discerning and thence for want of employing the arrangements
best
best adapted to this
design they fail more
or less in their endeavours
for the accomplishment of it.
Identifier: | JB/078/128/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-10-23 |
Not numbered |
||
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
128 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
C4 / E4 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1826 |
|||
25219 |
|||