★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
Auto approved |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic><lb/>Review of Humphreys.</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Agenda</note><lb/>(6 <note>§ Depending Suits in<lb/>Conveyances disposed of</note></p> <p>Corrigendum p. 156 — Evidence in each written <unclear>in part</unclear> "add <hi rend="underline">real</hi>.</p> <p>On the now depending suit <del>all</del> the time and <sic>expence</sic> already<lb/>expended will for the most part have been thrown away. On both<lb/>sides the Solicitors being <gap/> before the new Judicatory (of a single<lb/>Judge and no more would it be composed) would <del>be compelled</del> find<lb/>themselves under the necessity of stating whatsoever relevant information<lb/>they possessed in relation to their respective Clients. The Clients would<lb/>either be <unclear>exercised</unclear> and examined <foreign>viva voce</foreign> by the Judge, or an<lb/>interrogation <unclear>preapproved</unclear> by the Judge</p> <p><note>[+]<lb/>according to | <head>1826. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic><lb/>Review of Humphreys.</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Agenda</note><lb/>(6 <note>§ Depending Suits in<lb/>Conveyances disposed of</note></p> <p>Corrigendum p. 156 — Evidence in each written <unclear>in part</unclear> "add <hi rend="underline">real</hi>.</p> <p>On the now depending suit <del>all</del> the time and <sic>expence</sic> already<lb/>expended will for the most part have been thrown away. On both<lb/>sides the Solicitors being <gap/> before the new Judicatory (of a single<lb/>Judge and no more would it be composed) would <del>be compelled</del> find<lb/>themselves under the necessity of stating whatsoever relevant information<lb/>they possessed in relation to their respective Clients. The Clients would<lb/>either be <unclear>exercised</unclear> and examined <foreign>viva voce</foreign> by the Judge, or an<lb/>interrogation <unclear>preapproved</unclear> by the Judge</p> <p><note>[+]<lb/>according to their <gap/><lb/>or <unclear>readiness</unclear> for the ends of<lb/>judicature</note></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1826. Octr.
Review of Humphreys.
Ch. Agenda
(6 § Depending Suits in
Conveyances disposed of
Corrigendum p. 156 — Evidence in each written in part "add real.
On the now depending suit all the time and expence already
expended will for the most part have been thrown away. On both
sides the Solicitors being before the new Judicatory (of a single
Judge and no more would it be composed) would be compelled find
themselves under the necessity of stating whatsoever relevant information
they possessed in relation to their respective Clients. The Clients would
either be exercised and examined viva voce by the Judge, or an
interrogation preapproved by the Judge
[+]
according to their
or readiness for the ends of
judicature
|
Identifier: | JB/078/135/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-10 |
|||
|
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
135 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
E6 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1826 |
|||
|
25226 |
|||
