JB/110/120/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/110/120/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/110/120/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/110/120/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>Want of sympathy with the Poles;  and why?</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>People who condemned the horror of the<lb/>
 
French revolution, were inclined also <del>to the</del><lb/>
 
to condemn the uncontrollable liberties<lb/>
 
the Poles took in <del>behalf of</del> regard of the<lb/>
Kings;  and Poland's fate has not excited<lb/>
so much simpathy as it would have<lb/>
excited if <add>it</add> had <del>it happened at</del> not been<lb/>
connected with the revolution of the French<lb/>
or at least <add>if it <del>that</del></add> had <del>is not</del> happened at<lb/>
<del>be</del> a more distant period of time than<lb/>
within the five <add>subsequent</add> years after that revolution<lb/>
when not alone the thrones but the<lb/>
people were universally affraid of its<lb/>
dreadful results and <del>obviated</del> were<lb/>
inclined to obviate <del>every where</del> <add>any thing like</add> its<lb/>
<unclear>repetition</unclear>.  The common and principal<lb/>
topics of objection <del>to</del> <add>brought against</add> the poles <hi rend="underline">were</hi><lb/>
the unruly passions of their Nobles:<lb/>
the oppression of the peasantry:  and<lb/>
the <del>unhappy to <foreign>liberum</foreign> veto nee</del> <add>infamous</add><lb/>
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>niepozwalam</foreign></hi> (<foreign>liberum</foreign> vefo) which <unclear>unfitted</unclear><lb/>
them in the opinion of <del>all</del> <add>the whole</add> Europe for<lb/>
any improvement.  But little was known<lb/>
that the <del>liberum veto</del> Poles had abolished the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">liberum veto</hi> on the general Diet of the year;<lb/>
but Catharine II reestablished it again to secure<lb/>
to herself the influence in the affairs of Poland:  <del>Her</del><lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">xx</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">x</hi> <del>The Poles having lost the peo liberty of free deliberation on the Diets</del><lb/>
The Poles consequently, could make no improvement in their condition<lb/>
though they eagerly wished it.  In their deliberation they had<lb/>
constantly to struggle against the <gap/> <del>and event</del><lb/>
of their neighbours who were hostile <add><unclear></unclear>any form like</add> the popular<lb/>
form of government.</note></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:44, 27 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Want of sympathy with the Poles; and why?

People who condemned the horror of the
French revolution, were inclined also to the
to condemn the uncontrollable liberties
the Poles took in behalf of regard of the
Kings; and Poland's fate has not excited
so much simpathy as it would have
excited if it had it happened at not been
connected with the revolution of the French
or at least if it that had is not happened at
be a more distant period of time than
within the five subsequent years after that revolution
when not alone the thrones but the
people were universally affraid of its
dreadful results and obviated were
inclined to obviate every where any thing like its
repetition. The common and principal
topics of objection to brought against the poles were
the unruly passions of their Nobles:
the oppression of the peasantry: and
the unhappy to liberum veto nee infamous
niepozwalam (liberum vefo) which unfitted
them in the opinion of all the whole Europe for
any improvement. But little was known
that the liberum veto Poles had abolished the
liberum veto on the general Diet of the year;
but Catharine II reestablished it again to secure
to herself the influence in the affairs of Poland: Her
xx x The Poles having lost the peo liberty of free deliberation on the Diets
The Poles consequently, could make no improvement in their condition
though they eagerly wished it. In their deliberation they had
constantly to struggle against the and event
of their neighbours who were hostile any form like the popular
form of government.


Identifier: | JB/110/120/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 110.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

110

Main Headings

Folio number

120

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

a1 / / /

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

fellows & sons 1821

Marginals

Paper Producer

lord auckland

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1821

Notes public

ID Number

36110

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in