JB/159/014/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/014/004: Difference between revisions

M Hersey (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/014/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/014/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Punishment & restraint
 
<head>Punishment &amp; restraint
—Warburton</head><lb/>
—Warburton</head><lb/>
<head>NOTE</head><lb/>
<head>NOTE</head><lb/>
 
<p>not pretend to say. It may be <unclear>puing</unclear> him, comprising<lb/>
not pretend to say. It may be <unclear>puing</unclear> him, comprising<lb/>
time <add>banishing</add> have only him, burning him or, <add>in short</add> doing what I<lb/>
time <add>banishing</add> have only him, burning him or, <add>in short</add> doing what I<lb/>
should call <hi rend="underline">punishing</hi> him in any manner.<lb/>
should call <hi rend="underline">punishing</hi> him in any manner.<lb/>
Line 19: Line 19:
reckons. <del>banishment and</del> denial of Protection<lb/>
reckons. <del>banishment and</del> denial of Protection<lb/>
<add>and banishment</add> as distinct punishments. In a former part of the<lb/>
<add>and banishment</add> as distinct punishments. In a former part of the<lb/>
book he seems to represent them as one and the same.<!--+--><lb/>
book he seems to represent them as one and the same.<!--+--><lb/></p>
They are in fact <add>as we shall see <!--#--></add> perfectly distinct punishments; and <del>perfect</del> one <p><note>former<lb/> is upon the whole much the greater: so that the Anabaptist<lb/> upon this plan of punishment would come off worse than the<lb/> Papist, and the series which his Lordship <del>would</del><add>intended</add> for a <unclear>change</unclear> out of order.<lb/></p>
<p>They are in fact <add>as we shall see <!--#--></add> perfectly distinct punishments; and <del>perfect</del> one </p> <note>former<lb/> is upon the whole much the greater: so that the Anabaptist<lb/> upon this plan of punishment would come off worse than the<lb/> Papist, and the series which his Lordship <del>would</del> <add>intended</add> for a <unclear>change</unclear> out of order.<lb/>
<p>It is observable that in those two bits the one of four<lb/>  
<p>It is observable that in those two bits the one of four<lb/>  
<del><gap/></del> <add>things</add> that <add>according to his Lordship,</add> an <hi rend="underline">not</hi> punishments, the other four things, that<lb/></note></p>
<del><gap/></del> <add>things</add> that <add>according to his Lordship,</add> an <hi rend="underline">not</hi> punishments, the other four things, that<lb/></note>
<head>TEXT</head><lb/>
<head>TEXT</head><lb/>
<p>All these positions, to my apprehension I must own<lb/>
<p>All these positions, to my apprehension I must own<lb/>
Line 35: Line 35:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:37, 30 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Punishment & restraint —Warburton
NOTE

not pretend to say. It may be puing him, comprising
time banishing have only him, burning him or, in short doing what I
should call punishing him in any manner.
In the next page his Lordship gives us another list
of things which he says are punishments to a
man: desiring him to not tolerating him alsoif he
is be a drinker;ask dengins him the probation of the
Law, whenif he is an Anabaptist: banishing him
whoif he is a Papist: and burning him
if he is a Atheist. II Here we may observe his Lordship
reckons. banishment and denial of Protection
and banishment as distinct punishments. In a former part of the
book he seems to represent them as one and the same.

They are in fact as we shall see perfectly distinct punishments; and perfect one

former
is upon the whole much the greater: so that the Anabaptist
upon this plan of punishment would come off worse than the
Papist, and the series which his Lordship would intended for a change out of order.

It is observable that in those two bits the one of four
things that according to his Lordship, an not punishments, the other four things, that
TEXT

All these positions, to my apprehension I must own
seem far from being just: and if they were, I do not
see what would follow from them.

This much for punishment in general, and
the several objects it may require to be distinguished
from: we now come to the several examine into the particular modes of punishment:
the several manner kind of is which it is a possible
to produce it: the several shapes and defences in
which it may be made to show itself.



Identifier: | JB/159/014/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

014

Info in main headings field

punishment & restraint - warburton

Image

004

Titles

note / text

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53837

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in