JB/143/078/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/143/078/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1824 Oct. 28</p>
 
<p>Rationale of Reward</p>
 
<note>p. 186 <add>Gold as antiseptic </add> <del><gap/> of Retreat</del><lb/>
<del>Reason 3</del></note><lb/>
<p><del>The thing about Fred<gap/> of Prussia as in part subject <gap/> <gap/> preceding</del></p>
<p><del>In a former<add>the preceding Chapter</add> part of this work instances the <gap/> more</del> bring<gap/><lb/>
<del>to view from which, for most of <gap/> sufficient attention to the only</del> <lb/>
<del>true antiseptic abovementioned, gold <add>given to the
<gap/> at the expence of the <gap/></add>might naturally enough</del><lb/>
<del>be supposed</del> <add>As to the <del>possess</del> Prussian <gap/> it is a <gap/> one: but it is hollow</add> <del>to have this property.  Frederick the great of Prussia</del><lb/>
<add>and proves nothing.  Frederic </add>gave small salaries to his functionaries: and they were all <gap/><lb/>
Catherine <gap/> of Prussia took the same course and the result was<lb/>
the same.  Alexander <del>has some</del> pension: its result still the<lb/>
<del>same.</del> <add>same. See <hi rend="underline">Cochrane</hi> <del>interests</del> new see <hi rend="underline">Legal</hi>: see <del>affl</del> even the Newspapers: Indubitable</add> <del>All this is indubitable. But where <add>are wee to look for</add>lay the cause? Not</del> <lb/>
<add>the effect.  But the cause where is it? In the non-application of the</add> <del>in the smallest of the emoluments but in the form <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>only real antiseptic above mentioned; it would apply itself of itself</add> <del>of a very different antiseptic in the form of the government <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>but the despot will not suffer it? Why? because, in addition to the </add> <del>the many of the shapes proposed <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> <gap/> the</del> <lb/>
<add>misdeeds by which he is a <unclear>liar</unclear> it would exposed to view those by which</add><del>and few? in the interest which all are frenchmans in</del><lb/>
<add>in his own view of the matter be is a game: it would raise up a</add><del>general head in cooperating <gap/> <gap/>ple with the class of functionaries</del><lb/>
<add>power that would be a check upon his own.</add>
<del>in question <gap/> and in the absence of adequate inducement</del><lb/>
<del>on the part of person in general to contribute either</del><lb/>
<del>anticedently in the character of <gap/> or to primary to pre<gap/></del><lb/>
<add><del>ven<gap/> of delinquency in the shape in question</del> actual</add> <del>in a pri<gap/> any a watchman anticedently to a delinquency</del><lb/>
<add>Suppose now the antiseptic light kept <sic>fixt</sic></add> <del>Had the light of the public eye in its broadest <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>but therein</del> upon every part of the <add>public official</add> conduct of every public functionary<lb/>
<add>what would have been the consequence?</add> <del><gap/></del> In no shape could delinquency have been meditated<lb/>
without finding thus or that individual or set of individuals engaged.<lb/>
by <add><del>natural and yet</del></add> adequate interest to give publicity to it. <add>To the greatest part of</add> <del>In that state of</del><lb/>
<add>An extent natural without and from factitious interest would suffice.</add><del>though suppose <gap/></del> <add><del>each</del></add> office, with the  emolument and power attached to<lb/>
it, <add>suppose it</add> put up to competition. <add>Suppose now that</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> with</del> <add>added to</add>that <add>which</add> an apt <gap/>dident hand<lb/>
of <del>its</del> his own <del>it</del> <add>the <del><gap/> <gap/></del> emolument</add> was not enough to afford a living profit <add>who</add> <del>what</del><lb/>
<add>would <del>be the consequence?</del> put up for it or in much as accept it?</add><del>anybody Nobody would accept it for <gap/>more  <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>situation would for <gap/><add>for say</add> <gap/> engage <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><add>daily pay plan before hand the engaging</add></del><lb/>
<add>Nobody: for nobody who would stand any chance of being accepted would be for a </add><del>depredation and which presentment and infamy would be <gap/> to <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>small and momentary <del><gap/></del> profit, expose himself to little less than certain <del>in which</del> </add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> find an opposing watchman in every for</del><lb/>
<del>trader</del> immediate punishment and disgrace.  every smuggler for example would<lb/>
in every fair trades behold an opposing watchman, not the less inexorable for being unpaid<lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:30, 30 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824 Oct. 28

Rationale of Reward

p. 186 Gold as antiseptic of Retreat
Reason 3

The thing about Fred of Prussia as in part subject preceding

In a formerthe preceding Chapter part of this work instances the more bring
to view from which, for most of sufficient attention to the only
true antiseptic abovementioned, gold given to the at the expence of the might naturally enough
be supposed As to the possess Prussian it is a one: but it is hollow to have this property. Frederick the great of Prussia
and proves nothing. Frederic gave small salaries to his functionaries: and they were all
Catherine of Prussia took the same course and the result was
the same. Alexander has some pension: its result still the
same. same. See Cochrane interests new see Legal: see affl even the Newspapers: Indubitable All this is indubitable. But where are wee to look forlay the cause? Not
the effect. But the cause where is it? In the non-application of the in the smallest of the emoluments but in the form
only real antiseptic above mentioned; it would apply itself of itself of a very different antiseptic in the form of the government
but the despot will not suffer it? Why? because, in addition to the the many of the shapes proposed of the
misdeeds by which he is a liar it would exposed to view those by whichand few? in the interest which all are frenchmans in
in his own view of the matter be is a game: it would raise up ageneral head in cooperating ple with the class of functionaries
power that would be a check upon his own. in question and in the absence of adequate inducement
on the part of person in general to contribute either
anticedently in the character of or to primary to pre
ven of delinquency in the shape in question actual in a pri any a watchman anticedently to a delinquency
Suppose now the antiseptic light kept fixt Had the light of the public eye in its broadest
but therein upon every part of the public official conduct of every public functionary
what would have been the consequence? In no shape could delinquency have been meditated
without finding thus or that individual or set of individuals engaged.
by natural and yet adequate interest to give publicity to it. To the greatest part of In that state of
An extent natural without and from factitious interest would suffice.though suppose each office, with the emolument and power attached to
it, suppose it put up to competition. Suppose now that with added tothat which an apt dident hand
of its his own it the emolument was not enough to afford a living profit who what
would be the consequence? put up for it or in much as accept it?anybody Nobody would accept it for more
situation would for for say engage daily pay plan before hand the engaging
Nobody: for nobody who would stand any chance of being accepted would be for a depredation and which presentment and infamy would be to
small and momentary profit, expose himself to little less than certain in which find an opposing watchman in every for
trader immediate punishment and disgrace. every smuggler for example would
in every fair trades behold an opposing watchman, not the less inexorable for being unpaid

Identifier: | JB/143/078/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.

Date_1

1824-10-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

143

Main Headings

rationale of reward

Folio number

078

Info in main headings field

rationale of reward

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / d4 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48711

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in