JB/052/065/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/065/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>GB. 1824. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 26.<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note>P1<lb/><sic>Ch</sic> 1 Domestic &#x2014; the Model</note></p> <p>1.<lb/>Model of this System<lb/>of procedure, the domestic.</p> <p>2.<lb/>Immaturity of domestic<lb/>procedure<lb/>the objection answered.</p> <p>3.<lb/>So, as to objection<lb/>of ignorance in domestic<lb/>procedure</p> <p>4.<lb/>Domestic Judges<lb/>compared to the <unclear>Joudan</unclear><lb/>talking prose.</p> <p>5.<lb/>In domestic procedure<lb/>vices of technical<lb/>procedure avoided.</p> <p>1. No punishment<lb/>without hearing the<lb/>party punished.<lb/>2. No dispute decided<lb/>without hearing both<lb/>parties.<lb/>3. <sic>Falshood</sic> &#x2014; no cases<lb/>where it is allowed.<lb/>4. Distance of a<lb/>child, no reason for<lb/>non-communication</p> <p>6.<lb/>Communication<lb/>with children not<lb/>interventional.</p> <p>7.<lb/>No jargon used in<lb/>the intercourse with<lb/>the children</p> <p>8.<lb/>No delays allowed<lb/>to children to answer<lb/>accusation
<head>GB. 1824. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 26.<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note>P1<lb/><sic>Ch</sic> 1 Domestic &#x2014; the Model</note></p> <p>1.<lb/>Model of this System<lb/>of procedure, the domestic.</p> <p>2.<lb/>Immaturity of domestic<lb/>procedure<lb/>the objection answered.</p> <p>3.<lb/>So, as to objection<lb/>of ignorance in domestic<lb/>procedure</p> <p>4.<lb/>Domestic Judges<lb/>compared to the <unclear>Joudan</unclear><lb/>talking prose.</p> <p>5.<lb/>In domestic procedure<lb/>vices of technical<lb/>procedure avoided.</p> <p>1. No punishment<lb/>without hearing the<lb/>party punished.<lb/>2. No dispute decided<lb/>without hearing both<lb/>parties.<lb/>3. <sic>Falshood</sic> &#x2014; no cases<lb/>where it is allowed.<lb/>4. Distance of a<lb/>child, no reason for<lb/>non-communication</p> <p>6.<lb/>Communication<lb/>with children not<lb/>interventional.</p> <p>7.<lb/>No jargon used in<lb/>the intercourse with<lb/>the children</p> <p>8.<lb/>No delays allowed<lb/>to children to answer<lb/>accusation


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 22:28, 30 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

GB. 1824. Novr. 26.
Procedure Code

P1
Ch 1 Domestic — the Model

1.
Model of this System
of procedure, the domestic.

2.
Immaturity of domestic
procedure
the objection answered.

3.
So, as to objection
of ignorance in domestic
procedure

4.
Domestic Judges
compared to the Joudan
talking prose.

5.
In domestic procedure
vices of technical
procedure avoided.

1. No punishment
without hearing the
party punished.
2. No dispute decided
without hearing both
parties.
3. Falshood — no cases
where it is allowed.
4. Distance of a
child, no reason for
non-communication

6.
Communication
with children not
interventional.

7.
No jargon used in
the intercourse with
the children

8.
No delays allowed
to children to answer
accusation



Identifier: | JB/052/065/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1824-11-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-8

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

065

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

16738

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in