JB/051/027/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/027/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>EVIDENCE.  <add>1*</add> Number</head></p>
<head>EVIDENCE.  <add>1*</add><!-- added in pencil --> Number</head>
<p>reach him.  I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses<lb/>
<p>reach him.  I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses
had originally deposed to the treasonable <del>part</del> <add>act</add> of which he was accused <add>Indicted from the</add> , by the evasion<lb/>
<lb/>
of one of whom <add>it was that</add> the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I<lb/>
had originally deposed to the treasonable <del>fact</del> <add>act</add> of which he was accused <add>Indicted</add> , by the <add>from the</add> evasion
think it will hardly be contended <add>thought</add> that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on<lb/>
<lb/>
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one exam<lb/>
of one of whom <add>it was that</add> the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I
<del><unclear>if</unclear></del> in open Court &amp; cross-examined.</p>
<lb/>
<p>It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad<lb/>
think it will hardly be contended <add>thought</add> that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on  
of this provision ; <add>there being all probability that</add> the same <add>sense of</add> necessity which dictated one parliamentary infraction<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>being</del> in a similar conjuncture would dictate <add>to the same authority</add> another: <add>[taught &amp;]</add> justified &amp; instructed by<lb/>
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one &#x2014; exam
by this example .  Each succeeding Administration (we may venture to pronounce<lb/>
<lb/>
for the purpose as well as that of Forfeiture &amp; Corruption of Blood) thinking, (&amp; I<lb/>
<del><unclear>if</unclear></del> in open Court &amp; cross-examined.
see not why not justly) itself entitled to take the same precautions for it's <unclear>security</unclear><lb/>
<lb/></p>
as a preceding : are in <add>especially</add> particular <del>that has not been <add>to which whose conduct</add></del> <add>the memory of which</add> is not marked <del>by any <gap/></del> <add>by History with <unclear>a</unclear></add><lb/>
<p><!-- indent -->It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad
disapprobation <add>particular stigma</add><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ Qu - a little about this .</note>.</p>
<lb/>
<p>If <add>the testimony of</add> a single witness was then sufficient , <del>to render</del> it is so now &amp; will be hereafter:<lb/>
of this provision ; <add>there being all probability that</add> the same <add>sense of</add> necessity which dictated one parliamentary <unclear><sic>infractio</sic></unclear><!-- unfinished word: infraction -->
the same reasons that were urged for the suspension of this provision , <unclear>will</unclear><lb/>
<lb/>
be urged with the same reason &amp; probably with the same success , anothers <gap/><lb/>
<del><unclear>being</unclear></del> in a similar conjuncture would dictate <add>to the same authority</add> another: <add>[<unclear>taught</unclear> &amp;]</add> justified &amp; instructed by
old course of Justice will <add>be made to</add> take place notwithstanding this irregular attempt to stop<lb/>
<lb/>
it , only in the guise of hardship &amp; injustice.</p>
by this example .  Each succeeding Administration (we may venture to pronounce
<p><note>To repeal this provision will<lb/>
<lb/>
only be to restore the old Common-Law <lb/>
for the purpose as well as that of Forfeiture &amp; corruption of Blood) thinking, (&amp; <gap/>
Whoever will <del>take</del> the pains to<lb/>
<lb/>
peruse the <gap/> Histories of Trials<lb/>
see not why not justly) itself entitled to take the same precautions for it's <unclear>secur</unclear><!-- work unfinished -->
for Treason which we have extant<lb/>
<lb/>
will find , I believe, the violence<lb/>
as a preceding : are in <add>especially</add> particular <del>that <add><del>to which</del></add> has not been</del> <add><del>whose conduct</del> <add>the memory of which</add></add> is not marked <del>by any run <gap/></del> <add>by History with <gap/></add>
&amp; injustice that has been done brought<lb/>
<lb/>
about by <add>rather by</add> other means <add>methods</add> than by<lb/>
disapprobation <add>particular stigma</add> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ Qu - a little about this .</note>.
those against which this provision<lb/>can be a remedy.  To abridge &amp;<lb/>
<lb/></p>
criticize all those Trials will not <add>is what <lb/>
 
ever not be exploited</add> [come within by <add>the</add> compass of this work.]<lb/>
<p>If <add>the testimony of</add> a single witness was then sufficient , <del>to render</del> it is so now &amp; will be here
For the work must have it's bounds.<lb/>
<lb/>
But why must we expect forever<lb/>
&#x2014; after : the same reasons that were urged for the suspension of this provision , <unclear>will</unclear>
the extremity of violence &amp; injustice:<lb/>
<lb/>
has there not been continually less &amp;<lb/>
be urged with the same reason &amp; probably with the same success , anothers <gap/>
less up to the present time?  Nay,<lb/>
<lb/>
was there any at all chosen in the<lb/>
old course of Justice will <add>be made to</add> take place notwithstanding this irregular attempt to stop
Trials after the last Rebellion?<lb/>
<lb/>
To calm the inquietude of every<lb/>
it , only in the guise of hardship &amp; injustice. <note>To repeal this provision will only be to restore the old Common-Law</note>  <note>Whoever will <del>take</del> the pains to peruse the <gap/> <unclear>Historie</unclear><!-- or, 'Historic' ? --> of Trials for Treason which we have extant will find , I believe, the <sic>violenc</sic> &amp; injustice that has been done brought about by <add>rather by</add> other means <add>methods</add> than by those against which this provision can be a remedy.  To abridge &amp; criticize all those Trials will not <add>is what <gap/> not be <gap/></add> [come within by <add>the</add> compass of this work] For the work must have <sic>it's</sic> bounds  But why must we expect forever the extremity of violence &amp; injustice has there not been continually less &amp; less up to the present time ?  <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> any at all <gap/> in the <unclear>Trials</unclear> after the last Rebellion ?</note>  <note>To calm the <gap/> of every man's apprehensions is impossible : and <gap/><!-- 'security' ? --> <add><gap/></add> is not to be purchased by more Laws : all that can be done towards it by them is to take care that [they] <add>what there are</add> shall be stronger Barriers <gap/> the oppression of innocence than against the punishment of Guilt : But this is a stronger against the punishment of Guilt than against the oppression of innocence.</note
man's apprehensions is impossible: and security <add><gap/></add> is not to be purchased by more Laws: all<lb/>
<lb/></p>
that can be done towards it by them is to take care that [they] <add>what there are</add> shall be stronger Barriers <unclear>against</unclear><lb/>
 
the oppression of innocence than against the punishment of Guil : But this is a stronger<lb/>
 
against the punishment of Guilt than against the oppression of innocence.</note></p>
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:58, 31 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

EVIDENCE. 1* Number

reach him. I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses
had originally deposed to the treasonable part act of which he was accused Indicted from the , by the evasion
of one of whom it was that the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I
think it will hardly be contended thought that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one – exam
if in open Court & cross-examined.

It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad
of this provision ; there being all probability that the same sense of necessity which dictated one parliamentary infraction
being in a similar conjuncture would dictate to the same authority another: [taught &] justified & instructed by
by this example . Each succeeding Administration (we may venture to pronounce
for the purpose as well as that of Forfeiture & Corruption of Blood) thinking, (& I
see not why not justly) itself entitled to take the same precautions for it's security
as a preceding : are in especially particular that has not been to which whose conduct the memory of which is not marked by any by History with a
disapprobation particular stigma+ + Qu - a little about this ..

If the testimony of a single witness was then sufficient , to render it is so now & will be hereafter:
the same reasons that were urged for the suspension of this provision , will
be urged with the same reason & probably with the same success , anothers
old course of Justice will be made to take place notwithstanding this irregular attempt to stop
it , only in the guise of hardship & injustice.

To repeal this provision will
only be to restore the old Common-Law –
Whoever will take the pains to
peruse the Histories of Trials
for Treason which we have extant
will find , I believe, the violence
& injustice that has been done brought
about by rather by other means methods than by
those against which this provision
can be a remedy. To abridge &
criticize all those Trials will not is what
ever not be exploited
[come within by the compass of this work.]
For the work must have it's bounds.
But why must we expect forever
the extremity of violence & injustice:
has there not been continually less &
less up to the present time? Nay,
was there any at all chosen in the
Trials after the last Rebellion?
To calm the inquietude of every
man's apprehensions is impossible: and security is not to be purchased by more Laws: all
that can be done towards it by them is to take care that [they] what there are shall be stronger Barriers against
the oppression of innocence than against the punishment of Guil : But this is a stronger
against the punishment of Guilt than against the oppression of innocence.


Identifier: | JB/051/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

027

Info in main headings field

evidence number

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1*

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16192

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in