JB/071/060/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/060/002: Difference between revisions

Calico-pie (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<note>16</note> <head>C</head>
<note>16</note> <head>C</head>
<note>Diff</note> <head><del>Absence of</del> Falsehoods in General</head>
<note>Diff</note> <head><del>Absence of</del> Falsehoods in General</head>
<p>inflicted in any one place according to law, the same may<lb/>be inflicted in any other place by <gap/> of law.</p> <note><del><gap/></del> At any rate no harm can follow from the Supposition</note>
<p>inflicted in any one place according to law, the same may<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>Another</add> thing to be considered in favour of the amplitude<lb/> here attributed to the <del>case</del>  <add>offence</add> of Perjury, is that <del><gap/></del><lb/><del>in a view to punishment of <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></del><lb/>  
be inflicted in any other place by <gap/> of law.</p>  


<note><del><gap/></del> At any rate no harm can follow from the Supposition</note>
<p><del><gap/></del><add>Another</add> thing to be considered in favour of the amplitude<lb/>
here attributed to the <del>case</del>  <add>offence</add> of Perjury, is that <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<del>in a view to punishment of <gap/>great it can do <unclear>no</unclear> harm</del><lb/>
although <del>it</del><add> the notion of its extending <del>to</del> so far <del>any once <gap/></del></add> were to be ill founded in point of fact, <del>it</del><lb/>
<add> the mistake</add> would not be productive of any ill consequence. <lb/>
Let it be supposed for instance, that to such or such<lb/>
a mischief Perjury might be made subservient. If to <lb/>
the mischief in question Perjury can really be made <lb/>
subservient, it is highly proper that provision should be <lb/>
made for it: if not, there is no good done <add>indeed</add> by the provision <lb/>
made for it, but still there is no harm. This <lb/>
will hold good as well with regard to a final provision <lb/>
as any other. If the offence can be committed, it is <lb/>
as proper that it should be punished as any other: if it <lb/>
can not, the punishment though <unclear>denounced</unclear> can never be <lb/>
inflicted: so that <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add><unclear>here</unclear> to although it should do</add> no good, at least it does no<lb/>
harm. <add><gap/></add> And the same observation hold, equally good with<lb/>
regard to the two other offences of <unclear>ferronation</unclear> and forgery.</p>
<pb/>
<head>NOTE</head>
<p>(a) To this rule the case of <unclear>Witchcraft</unclear> is indeed an exception:<lb/>
Witchcraft has been but too often furnished though it can never<lb/>
have been committed. But without entering into details, it is<lb/>
easy to see that a case <gap/> that has been nothing <add>in common</add> <del><gap/></del> with the <unclear>foment</unclear>.<lb/>
<add>In The case of Perjury</add> There are no principles of illusion to make a man <unclear>require</unclear><lb/>
the crime as in that of Witchcraft. <note>To p. 19 at top</note><lb/></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:57, 31 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

16 C Diff Absence of Falsehoods in General

inflicted in any one place according to law, the same may
be inflicted in any other place by of law.

At any rate no harm can follow from the Supposition

Another thing to be considered in favour of the amplitude
here attributed to the case offence of Perjury, is that
in a view to punishment of great it can do no harm
although it the notion of its extending to so far any once were to be ill founded in point of fact, it
the mistake would not be productive of any ill consequence.
Let it be supposed for instance, that to such or such
a mischief Perjury might be made subservient. If to
the mischief in question Perjury can really be made
subservient, it is highly proper that provision should be
made for it: if not, there is no good done indeed by the provision
made for it, but still there is no harm. This
will hold good as well with regard to a final provision
as any other. If the offence can be committed, it is
as proper that it should be punished as any other: if it
can not, the punishment though denounced can never be
inflicted: so that here to although it should do no good, at least it does no
harm. And the same observation hold, equally good with
regard to the two other offences of ferronation and forgery.


---page break---

NOTE

(a) To this rule the case of Witchcraft is indeed an exception:
Witchcraft has been but too often furnished though it can never
have been committed. But without entering into details, it is
easy to see that a case that has been nothing in common with the foment.
In The case of Perjury There are no principles of illusion to make a man require
the crime as in that of Witchcraft. To p. 19 at top



Identifier: | JB/071/060/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

060

Info in main headings field

of falshoods in general

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f15 / f16 / f17 / f18

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23463

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in