JB/081/370/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/370/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<p>1824 May 24<lb/>
<p>1824 May 24<lb/>
<head>Petition</head></p>
<head>Petition</head></p>
<p><del>Of this institution</del> <add><del>The proof of</del> Of</add> the <gap/> and <gap/> of the institution<lb/>
<p><del>Of this institution</del> <add><del>The proof of</del> Of</add> the <gap/> and <unclear>popularity</unclear> of the institution<lb/>
the one made of it by Boneparte is evidence in no small degree<lb/>
the use made of it by Boneparte is evidence in no small degree<lb/>
probative.  Witness his Titre et <hi rend="underline">Conciliation</hi>:  and the <del><gap/></del><lb/>
probative.  Witness his Titre et <hi rend="underline">Conciliation</hi>:  and the <del><gap/></del><lb/>
in the case where the Committee has but one member this Commissioner<lb/>
in the case where the Committee has but one member this Commissioner<lb/>
<add><del>Reconciliation</del></add> is in France represented by the Juge de Paix.  Name of<lb/>
<add><del>Reconciliation</del></add> is in France represented by the Juge de Paix.  Name of<lb/>
the functionary borrowed from England
the functionary borrowed from England:  of the function, from Denmark:<lb/>
</p>
and under the <del><gap/></del> inspiration of <del>the</del> Lawyercraft,  is<lb/>
 
some piece of <gap/> the whole work.</p>
 
<p>Under the Danish system the Committee is one person<lb/>
or small <unclear>set</unclear> of two persons or of three persons:  <add>all <del>are non <gap/></del> non-law learned</add> the members of the<lb/>
'ordinary tribunals' a quite different set of persons:  of course all<lb/>
of them law learned.  But in France the <gap/> if this<lb/>
may be his name <add>is himself a species of Judge Titre IV Art 48 who in that character has business to do a plenty all that time,</add> and the Judges are one and the same person.<lb/>
In Titre IV. Art. 48 you see him with his <gap/> jacket.<lb/>
Pure <gap/> evil is this <gap/> about conciliation.  Belies<lb/>
the case in which it <del>is to <gap/></del> must have place and those in<lb/>
which it needs not, a law is undertaken to be drawn:  and<lb/>
nothing can be more confused and untraceable than this same<lb/>
law:  <add>samples those</add> demands which require dispatch – <gap/> against parties<lb/>
more than two whether they have or have not the same interest.</p>
<p>In the Danish <del>institution</del> Committee room no Attorney, no <gap/>.  In France Bonapartes draughtsman does not say so:  he lets<lb/>
in an Attorney by disguise.  Disguised under a <gap/><lb/>
provided for him.  <del>the</del> The equal in <gap/>, now <gap/> is <del><gap/></del> in<lb/>
a <foreign>facilé de <gap/></foreign>.  <del><gap/></del> To exclude Attorneys was it the<lb/>
draughtsmans <unclear>meaning</unclear>?  No not they:  who <del>was it</del> <add>said</add> it his meaning<lb/>
he knows well enough how to <add>express and</add> compass it.  Art. 4th <foreign>La procedure<lb/>
devans les Tribunacy de Common se fait sans le <gap/> et Avoués</foreign></p>
<p><del>By The plaintiff</del> <add>With</add> a fixt interval three days <gap/> from the<lb/>
day of which the Defendant must appear to hear the word <gap/><lb/>
pronounced.  But in the interval he must have appealed <unclear>an</unclear> Attorney<lb/>
no Attorney no Justice nor Reconciliative matter.  <del>The</del> When the day<lb/>
for both is come <del>the parties may be <add>and are</add> present</del> whether party shall<lb/>
be suffered to be present depends upon the pleasure of the Judge:  present,<lb/>
the party may be of the Judge pleasure:  <del><gap/></del> present an Attorney<lb/>
must be whether his Client pleases or no:  as many as <del>that</del>
<gap/>, and an Attorney <gap/> Art. 75.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 01:41, 2 November 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824 May 24
Petition

Of this institution The proof of Of the and popularity of the institution
the use made of it by Boneparte is evidence in no small degree
probative. Witness his Titre et Conciliation: and the
in the case where the Committee has but one member this Commissioner
Reconciliation is in France represented by the Juge de Paix. Name of
the functionary borrowed from England: of the function, from Denmark:
and under the inspiration of the Lawyercraft, is
some piece of the whole work.

Under the Danish system the Committee is one person
or small set of two persons or of three persons: all are non non-law learned the members of the
'ordinary tribunals' a quite different set of persons: of course all
of them law learned. But in France the if this
may be his name is himself a species of Judge Titre IV Art 48 who in that character has business to do a plenty all that time, and the Judges are one and the same person.
In Titre IV. Art. 48 you see him with his jacket.
Pure evil is this about conciliation. Belies
the case in which it is to must have place and those in
which it needs not, a law is undertaken to be drawn: and
nothing can be more confused and untraceable than this same
law: samples those demands which require dispatch – against parties
more than two whether they have or have not the same interest.

In the Danish institution Committee room no Attorney, no . In France Bonapartes draughtsman does not say so: he lets
in an Attorney by disguise. Disguised under a
provided for him. the The equal in , now is in
a facilé de . To exclude Attorneys was it the
draughtsmans meaning? No not they: who was it said it his meaning
he knows well enough how to express and compass it. Art. 4th La procedure
devans les Tribunacy de Common se fait sans le et Avoués

By The plaintiff With a fixt interval three days from the
day of which the Defendant must appear to hear the word
pronounced. But in the interval he must have appealed an Attorney
no Attorney no Justice nor Reconciliative matter. The When the day
for both is come the parties may be and are present whether party shall
be suffered to be present depends upon the pleasure of the Judge: present,
the party may be of the Judge pleasure: present an Attorney
must be whether his Client pleases or no: as many as that , and an Attorney Art. 75.


Identifier: | JB/081/370/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

370

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

26157

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in