★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 April 19<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>+ + 1 <note><sic>ult</sic></note><lb/>1</p> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>§. II Elucidation<lb/>III. Courts Martial</note></p> <p>☞ For the press</p> <p>III. | <head>1829 April 19<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>+ + 1 <note><sic>ult</sic></note><lb/>1</p> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>§. II Elucidation<lb/>III. Courts Martial</note></p> <p>☞ For the press</p> <p>III. Third parallel <del>system. <gap/> of Courts Martial <gap/></del> <add>practice, that of Courts Martial</add><lb/><del>§. III. Third course of parallel-affording <add>course of</add> procedure<lb/>that of Courts Martial <add>and Judicial Establishment</add></del></p> <p><add>First</add> Third as to <add>course of</add> procedure</p> <p><note><del>1<lb/><del>Exceptions excepted Courts<lb/>Martial in accordance with<lb/>proposed system.</del></note></p><p>1. Exceptions excepted, <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> Court Martial<lb/><del>system</del> <add>practice</add> is under this head in perfect accordance <del>with the</del> <add>with the</add><lb/>here proposed system.</p> <p><note><del>2<lb/>Exceptions 1 <add>no</add> intercourse<lb/>securing arrangements<lb/>2 <gap/> <add>no</add> responsibility<lb/>securing arrangements</del></note></p> <p>Exceptions are 1. Non application of the intercourse-<lb/>securing <del><gap/></del> arrangements. 2. Non-application<lb/>of the <del>eventual res</del> mutual responsibility-securing arrangements.</p> <p><note><del>3<lb/>From the omission no<lb/>argument against<lb/>proposed system nor<lb/>against Courts Martial.</del></note></p> <p><del>From</del> <add>Not that <del><gap/></del> by</add> these omissions, <del>no inference</del> <add>any</add> argument<lb/>is <del>suggested</del> <add>afforded</add> either against the here proposed system, for<lb/>the employment <del>given</del> which is given to them, — <add>or</add> against<lb/><del>the</del> Courts Martial <add>practice</add> for its omitting to employ them.</p> <p><note><del>4<lb/>Under proposed system<lb/>these arrangements employed<lb/>because necessary in every<lb/>sort but these excepted<lb/>Judicatories</del></note></p> <p>Under the here proposed system these are employed,<lb/>and why? Because, in the case of every sort of judicatory<lb/><del><gap/></del> but those excepted Judicatories, they are <del><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/></add></del><lb/><add>indispensably</add> necessary to the <del>good administration <gap/></del> fulfilment of the ends<lb/>of justice.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note><del>5<lb/>In excepted judicatories<lb/>not employed because not<lb/>necessary for ends of Justice</del></note></p> <p><del>Under</del> In the excepted Judicatories in question<lb/>they are not employed. Nor need they be employed.<lb/>Why? because <del>by these</del> <add>in these instances</add> the employment of them is not necessary<lb/>to the fulfilment of the ends of justice. Without any<lb/>special arrangements made on purpose, the relative situation<lb/>of the <del>members</del> <add>Judges</add> of the judicatory on the one hand; and<lb/>the <sic>Judgeables</sic> (so to speak) on the other hand, suffices of<lb/>itself for both these purposes.</p> <p><note>Justice Justice<lb/>Justice Justice</note></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 April 19
Petitions
+ + 1 ult
1
Supplement
§. II Elucidation
III. Courts Martial
☞ For the press
III. Third parallel system. of Courts Martial practice, that of Courts Martial
§. III. Third course of parallel-affording course of procedure
that of Courts Martial and Judicial Establishment
First Third as to course of procedure
1Exceptions excepted Courts
Martial in accordance with
proposed system.
1. Exceptions excepted, Court Martial
system practice is under this head in perfect accordance with the with the
here proposed system.
2
Exceptions 1 no intercourse
securing arrangements
2 no responsibility
securing arrangements
Exceptions are 1. Non application of the intercourse-
securing arrangements. 2. Non-application
of the eventual res mutual responsibility-securing arrangements.
3
From the omission no
argument against
proposed system nor
against Courts Martial.
From Not that by these omissions, no inference any argument
is suggested afforded either against the here proposed system, for
the employment given which is given to them, — or against
the Courts Martial practice for its omitting to employ them.
4
Under proposed system
these arrangements employed
because necessary in every
sort but these excepted
Judicatories
Under the here proposed system these are employed,
and why? Because, in the case of every sort of judicatory
but those excepted Judicatories, they are
indispensably necessary to the good administration fulfilment of the ends
of justice.
5
In excepted judicatories
not employed because not
necessary for ends of Justice
Under In the excepted Judicatories in question
they are not employed. Nor need they be employed.
Why? because by these in these instances the employment of them is not necessary
to the fulfilment of the ends of justice. Without any
special arrangements made on purpose, the relative situation
of the members Judges of the judicatory on the one hand; and
the Judgeables (so to speak) on the other hand, suffices of
itself for both these purposes.
Justice Justice
Justice Justice
|
Identifier: | JB/081/352/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-04-19 |
1-5 |
||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
352 |
petitions |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
1828 |
||
|
1828 |
|||
|
26139 |
|||
