JB/054/091/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/054/091/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/054/091/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/091/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/091/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. <del>May</del> July 3<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head><note>Ch. Evidence<lb/>
 
&sect;. Why and how far needed</note></p>
 
<p>Art.  <del><gap/></del> In either of these cases the Judge<lb/>
 
is <gap/> <add>by the lights within him</add> in pronouncing an opinion in relation to the<lb/>
matter of fact in question without any special evidence<lb/>
from without:  and if the fact in question be sufficient to<lb/>
form a ground for the decree, he is warranted in grounding<lb/>
<add>upon it</add> a decree.</p>
<p>But over and with <add>and in some sort are</add> the Judge sits by its <unclear>Committee</unclear><lb/>
in the Judicatory the Public Opinion Tribunal:  and over him<lb/>
and at a distance sits the Judge of the <unclear>Appellate</unclear> Judicatory<lb/>
by whom is decree is founded on the fact in question may be<lb/>
reversed or modified.  Accordingly</p>
<p>1.  Whatsoever perception it has happened to him to have<lb/>
received on the fact in question the Judge stands bound to<lb/>
state in open judicatory in the same manner as any other<lb/>
witness.</p>
<p>2.  He may accordingly <add>in respect of such his alledged perception</add> be examined and cross-examined<lb/>
in the same manner as any other witness.</p>
<p>So in respect of any fact alledged by him to<lb/>
stated by him as being <add>to be</add> regarded by him as notorious<lb/>
the fact may be contested by counter argument and counter<lb/>
evidence in the same manner as any fact <del>specially</del><lb/>
in relation to which special evidence has been <del><gap/></del><lb/>
exhibited.</p>
<p>On the other in respect of any such contestation<lb/>
<add>the a party contesting is</add> in respect of delay vexation and expence in case of<lb/>
insincerity or <unclear>transcribing</unclear> of assertion responsible in this as<lb/>
in other cases.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:14, 17 November 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825. May July 3
Procedure CodeCh. Evidence
§. Why and how far needed

Art. In either of these cases the Judge
is by the lights within him in pronouncing an opinion in relation to the
matter of fact in question without any special evidence
from without: and if the fact in question be sufficient to
form a ground for the decree, he is warranted in grounding
upon it a decree.

But over and with and in some sort are the Judge sits by its Committee
in the Judicatory the Public Opinion Tribunal: and over him
and at a distance sits the Judge of the Appellate Judicatory
by whom is decree is founded on the fact in question may be
reversed or modified. Accordingly

1. Whatsoever perception it has happened to him to have
received on the fact in question the Judge stands bound to
state in open judicatory in the same manner as any other
witness.

2. He may accordingly in respect of such his alledged perception be examined and cross-examined
in the same manner as any other witness.

So in respect of any fact alledged by him to
stated by him as being to be regarded by him as notorious
the fact may be contested by counter argument and counter
evidence in the same manner as any fact specially
in relation to which special evidence has been
exhibited.

On the other in respect of any such contestation
the a party contesting is in respect of delay vexation and expence in case of
insincerity or transcribing of assertion responsible in this as
in other cases.


Identifier: | JB/054/091/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1825-07-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

3-6

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

091

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17610

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in