JB/068/215/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/068/215/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/215/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/068/215/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1826. May July 7<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Penal Code</head><note>Ch. Justification</note></p>
 
<p>Example of a case of <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>consent obtained by fraud, to wit</add><lb/>
 
by fraudulent advice.</p>
 
<p><del>A <gap/></del> For sake of the profit a medical practitioner<lb/>
in a case where <add>with</add> amputation is <del><gap/></del> needless is the success<lb/>
of it in the preservation of life hopeless obtains the patients<lb/>
consent to undergo it.</p>
<p>When it is clear that by <add>from</add> the consent though obtained by<lb/>
misrepresentation no profit in any shape accrues to the practitioner<lb/>
or other adviser the greed for punishment may be <gap/><lb/>
but the ground for compensation remains <unclear>unquestionable</unclear>.</p>
<p>Scarcely beyond <hi rend="underline">corporal vexation</hi> does the applicability<lb/>
of the <del><gap/></del> <add>justificative</add> circumstances <del>of <gap/></del> extend itself.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:03, 20 November 2023

Click Here To Edit

1826. May July 7
Penal CodeCh. Justification

Example of a case of consent obtained by fraud, to wit
by fraudulent advice.

A For sake of the profit a medical practitioner
in a case where with amputation is needless is the success
of it in the preservation of life hopeless obtains the patients
consent to undergo it.

When it is clear that by from the consent though obtained by
misrepresentation no profit in any shape accrues to the practitioner
or other adviser the greed for punishment may be
but the ground for compensation remains unquestionable.

Scarcely beyond corporal vexation does the applicability
of the justificative circumstances of extend itself.


Identifier: | JB/068/215/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68.

Date_1

1826-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

068

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

215

Info in main headings field

penal code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

22410

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in