JB/003/104/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/104/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->24 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1801<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Paper Mischief</head></p>
 
<p>I speak of the <hi rend="underline">past</hi> depretiation.  But<lb/>
 
<del><gap/></del> <add>what is</add> is matter of <add>has no value but</add> curiosity rather than<lb/>
 
value, <add>but</add> otherwise than with reference to the future.<lb/>
It is <del>only</del> with a view of forming<lb/>
an estimate of what the depretiation is likely<lb/>
to amount to in an equal future period – it<lb/>
is for that purpose and that only that I<lb/>
should <del><gap/></del> <add>have</add> thought it worth enquiring <add>the enquiry</add> what<lb/>
it has amounted to in the period just <add>last</add> past:<lb/>
and if my view of the matter be right, then,<lb/>
<del>although</del> <add>whatever</add> the amount of the depretiation may<lb/>
want of being equal <add>amounting</add> to 50 per Cent with<lb/>
reference to the <del>past what it</del> state of things<lb/>
at the commencement of the past period <add>of 40 years</add> ending<lb/>
with the end of the year 1800, I believe it<lb/>
will appear but too probable that it will be<lb/>
at the end of the <del>future and</del> current period of 40 years ending at the end of the year 1841, it will be<lb/>
more likely to exceed than to fall short of the<lb/>
same rate of 50 per Cent with reference to<lb/>
the state of things at the commencement of this<lb/>
current period:  insomuch that though <del>it were<lb/>
not g</del> with reference to the <add>end of the</add> year 1760 it <del>did<lb/>
not at</del> should not be found to have amounted<lb/>
at the end of 1800 to quite so much as 50<lb/>
per Cent, yet at the end of 1840 it will be<lb/>
found to amount with reference to that same<lb/>
year 1760, to not less than 75 per Cent.<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <gap/> mention of <hi rend="underline">acceleration</hi> here or further on.</note></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:53, 6 December 2023

Click Here To Edit

24 Jany 1801
Paper Mischief

I speak of the past depretiation. But
what is is matter of has no value but curiosity rather than
value, but otherwise than with reference to the future.
It is only with a view of forming
an estimate of what the depretiation is likely
to amount to in an equal future period – it
is for that purpose and that only that I
should have thought it worth enquiring the enquiry what
it has amounted to in the period just last past:
and if my view of the matter be right, then,
although whatever the amount of the depretiation may
want of being equal amounting to 50 per Cent with
reference to the past what it state of things
at the commencement of the past period of 40 years ending
with the end of the year 1800, I believe it
will appear but too probable that it will be
at the end of the future and current period of 40 years ending at the end of the year 1841, it will be
more likely to exceed than to fall short of the
same rate of 50 per Cent with reference to
the state of things at the commencement of this
current period: insomuch that though it were
not g
with reference to the end of the year 1760 it did
not at
should not be found to have amounted
at the end of 1800 to quite so much as 50
per Cent, yet at the end of 1840 it will be
found to amount with reference to that same
year 1760, to not less than 75 per Cent. mention of acceleration here or further on.


Identifier: | JB/003/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1800-01-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

2

Box

003

Main Headings

manual of political economy

Folio number

104

Info in main headings field

paper mischief

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1798 a<…>

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

1514

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in