JB/091/142/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/142/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/142/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/142/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->27 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1806<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Scotch Reform  To L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Grenville</head></p>
 
<p><unclear>Longuet</unclear>, in one of his <gap/> has recorded an<lb/>
 
example.  The    was<lb/>
 
The    was<lb/>
It became in consequence a standing object of economy and<lb/>
contrivance on the part of the <del>Defendant</del> <add>Plaintiff</add> to avoid <add>chide the obligation of</add> furnishing<lb/>
himself with this costly <unclear>merriment</unclear>?<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> instances, it has<lb/>
happened to me to meet<lb/>
with, here and there,<lb/>
in abundance.</note> <del>not</del> Note that it was to<lb/>
the Plaintiff that it would have been of use, if to anybody:<lb/>
from his anxiety not to have it, judge, my Lord, of the use.</p>
<p>As to the reform, it is <del>in futur</del> to be "sufficient",<lb/>
sufficient in future, "that there be" this, and that and<lb/>
t'other, including everything that <del><gap/></del> one should have<lb/>
thought, anyone could have thought of putting there:  unless<lb/>
it were a compleat collection of the misrepresentations<lb/>
poured out, and already in print on both sides, by<lb/>
<del>pusher</del> <add>the</add> advocates, in the wings of their own imagination<lb/>
mounted on those of <del>their</del> the parties and their Attorneys<lb/>
under the mendacity-<gap/>.  Instrument of demand<lb/>
instrument of defence, <unclear>replies</unclear>, <gap/> and so forth not<lb/>
specified for fear of frightening their Lordships, but of course<lb/>
meant to be included.  Interlocutors <del>all of them</del> as many<lb/>
<add>dozen of them</add> as shall have been raised in a soil so fertile in Interlocutors,<lb/>
all in addition to final Judgment – all this<lb/>
<del>but a part</del> pronounced indispensably necessary – <del><gap/></del> and<lb/>
yet but a part only of the aggregate mass <add>in this scheme of retrenchment</add> which it is<lb/>
proposed <del><gap/> the set</del> to find <add><del>to be</del> lying</add> in the same predicament:  and<lb/>
this it is that is given as a specimen of what it is proposed to find possible in the way of<lb/>
abolition <del>and</del> <add>or</add> diminution.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:13, 6 December 2023

Click Here To Edit

27 Decr 1806
Scotch Reform To Ld Grenville

Longuet, in one of his has recorded an
example. The was
The was
It became in consequence a standing object of economy and
contrivance on the part of the Defendant Plaintiff to avoid chide the obligation of furnishing
himself with this costly merriment? instances, it has
happened to me to meet
with, here and there,
in abundance.
not Note that it was to
the Plaintiff that it would have been of use, if to anybody:
from his anxiety not to have it, judge, my Lord, of the use.

As to the reform, it is in futur to be "sufficient",
sufficient in future, "that there be" this, and that and
t'other, including everything that one should have
thought, anyone could have thought of putting there: unless
it were a compleat collection of the misrepresentations
poured out, and already in print on both sides, by
pusher the advocates, in the wings of their own imagination
mounted on those of their the parties and their Attorneys
under the mendacity-. Instrument of demand
instrument of defence, replies, and so forth not
specified for fear of frightening their Lordships, but of course
meant to be included. Interlocutors all of them as many
dozen of them as shall have been raised in a soil so fertile in Interlocutors,
all in addition to final Judgment – all this
but a part pronounced indispensably necessary – and
yet but a part only of the aggregate mass in this scheme of retrenchment which it is
proposed the set to find to be lying in the same predicament: and
this it is that is given as a specimen of what it is proposed to find possible in the way of
abolition and or diminution.


Identifier: | JB/091/142/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1806-12-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-5

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

142

Info in main headings field

scotch reform to ld grenville

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

29138

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in