JB/104/362/001

Click Here To Edit

25 June 1811 2
Fallacies

IX ad amicitiam
Ch. 1.

4

Now C or J?

10 or 3
10 or 3
Names of the genera
of the ad amicitiam
class corresponding
to those of the ad
odium class.
1. Good intention trumpeters
or ascribers argument
2. Good-character do do.
3. Good motive do do
4. Consistency trumpeters do
5. Good-character-inferrers
close argument in
the way of inference
ex socii
6. Dos loose argument
in the way of inferring
ex consentanius
7. Dos loose argument
in the way of inference
ex cognominibus.

Drawn up in correspondence with the list of the arguments
ad odium that of the arguments ad amicitiam
would stand as follows, viz.

1. Good-design ascribers tumpeter's argument.
2. Good character-ascriber's argument
3. Good-motive ascriber's argument.
4. Consistency-ascriber's argument
5. Good character-inferrers close argument, by in the way of inference ex
sociis.
7. Good character-inferrer's loose argument, by inference
ex cognominibus.
6. Good-character-inferrer's loose argument by inference ex
consentanius.

Identifier: | JB/104/362/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.
Date_1	1811-06-25	Marginal Summary Numbering	10 or 3
Box	104	Main Headings	fallacies
Folio number	362	Info in main headings field	fallacies
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d2 / e4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	34333
Box Contents