JB/106/191/001

Click Here To Edit

16 May 1807

and the reserves he has met with compared with which
neglect would be a fav have come a favour is such
as to an eye of ordinary prudence need have been
to a perpetual veto – bar to every such enterprize thought.

But forasmuch as there has never been that person
– no so much as that lawyer, much less that lawyer –
on whom any such individual responsibility – any such
such obligation of taking cognizance of the field of law (the narrow
department abovementioned excepted) with a view to the inquiry,
whether any imperfections are to be found in it, and if so as
what, if any may be the most eligible remedies – it may
be imagined by any reader especially as, at least by any one to by whom to whose notice the
wish of which this is the signal has been grad become presented
itself, whether it be in the nature of things that unless it be here
and there by the merest accident it should ever have happened
to any hand eye in the smallest degree competent, to survey
it in any such view.

To an enterprize of this sort On the part of the non-lawyer there exists no other
obstacle than the simple negative one consisting in the simple mere
absence of every adequate inviting instance interest. One the

On the part of the

Identifier: | JB/106/191/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.
Date_1	1807-05-16	Marginal Summary Numbering	21-22
Box	106	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	191	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c11
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	34779
Box Contents