★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/015/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->6 July 1816<lb/> | |||
<head>Polit. D</head></p> | |||
<p><del>N</del> | |||
<foreign>Nunquam libertas gratior exstat<lb/> | |||
Quam sub rege pio.</foreign></p> | |||
<p>The passage <add>observation</add> (it is in Claudian) is a celebrated one,<lb/> | |||
it is a plausible, an engaging one: and very considerable<lb/> | |||
it can scarcely be doubted – has been its influence.</p> | |||
<p>Good in poetry it is proportionably bad in political deontology.<lb/> | |||
In deontology the goodness of the observations depends<lb/> | |||
on their correctness: in that exactness of their agreement <del>to</del> <add>with</add><lb/> | |||
<del>the truth of thing <gap/> the nature</del> the circumstances <add>particulars</add> of<lb/> | |||
the case whatever it may be: with good poetry <del>any</del> <add>no</add> such<lb/> | |||
exactness is compatible.</p> | |||
<p>In this passage two suppositions are contended: neither<lb/> | |||
of them ever exemplified: neither of them consistent with<lb/> | |||
the nature of the case. One is – that under a king: viz. the<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> only <gap/></del> king of the only sort of government that on<lb/> | |||
that occasion could have been in view, <hi rend="underline">liberty</hi> (and<lb/> | |||
this in the sense in which it is synonymous to political<lb/> | |||
security, security against bad government) liberty could<lb/> | |||
have place. The other is that in such a government<lb/> | |||
in the instance <add>person</add> of a king any such quality as poetry<lb/> | |||
if <del>poetry</del> by poetry be understood (as it must if any <gap/><lb/> | |||
signification be <unclear>attached</unclear> to the word) a disposition to<lb/> | |||
take <del>the</del> in the conduct of the government the maximum<lb/> | |||
of utility as <del>the</del> and for the predominantly ruling principle.</p> | |||
<p>☞ Then go on to shew how necessarily self willed a man is that<lb/> | |||
there is rendered by what he <del>to</del> is continually bearing about his goodness, his<lb/> | |||
wisdom &c: that with this<lb/> | |||
political security is not<lb/> | |||
consistent, &c.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> yes: the more<lb/> | |||
<del>capable the more</del> <gap/><lb/> | |||
the more agreeable.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
6 July 1816
Polit. D
N
Nunquam libertas gratior exstat
Quam sub rege pio.
The passage observation (it is in Claudian) is a celebrated one,
it is a plausible, an engaging one: and very considerable
it can scarcely be doubted – has been its influence.
Good in poetry it is proportionably bad in political deontology.
In deontology the goodness of the observations depends
on their correctness: in that exactness of their agreement to with
the truth of thing the nature the circumstances particulars of
the case whatever it may be: with good poetry any no such
exactness is compatible.
In this passage two suppositions are contended: neither
of them ever exemplified: neither of them consistent with
the nature of the case. One is – that under a king: viz. the
only king of the only sort of government that on
that occasion could have been in view, liberty (and
this in the sense in which it is synonymous to political
security, security against bad government) liberty could
have place. The other is that in such a government
in the instance person of a king any such quality as poetry
if poetry by poetry be understood (as it must if any
signification be attached to the word) a disposition to
take the in the conduct of the government the maximum
of utility as the and for the predominantly ruling principle.
☞ Then go on to shew how necessarily self willed a man is that
there is rendered by what he to is continually bearing about his goodness, his
wisdom &c: that with this
political security is not
consistent, &c.
yes: the more
capable the more
the more agreeable.
Identifier: | JB/015/067/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1816-07-06 |
|||
015 |
deontology |
||
067 |
polit. d. |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
john dickinson & c<…> 1813 |
||
a. levy |
|||
1813 |
|||
5283 |
|||