JB/015/067/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/015/067/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->6 July 1816<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Polit. D</head></p>
 
<p><del>N</del>
 
<foreign>Nunquam libertas gratior exstat<lb/>
 
Quam sub rege pio.</foreign></p>
<p>The passage <add>observation</add> (it is in Claudian) is a celebrated one,<lb/>
it is a plausible, an engaging one:  and very considerable<lb/>
it can scarcely be doubted – has been its influence.</p>
<p>Good in poetry it is proportionably bad in political deontology.<lb/>
In deontology the goodness of the observations depends<lb/>
on their correctness:  in that exactness of their agreement <del>to</del> <add>with</add><lb/>
<del>the truth of thing <gap/> the nature</del> the circumstances <add>particulars</add> of<lb/>
the case whatever it may be:  with good poetry <del>any</del> <add>no</add> such<lb/>
exactness is compatible.</p>
<p>In this passage two suppositions are contended:  neither<lb/>
of them ever exemplified:  neither of them consistent with<lb/>
the nature of the case.  One is – that under a king:  viz. the<lb/>
<del><gap/> only <gap/></del> king of the only sort of government that on<lb/>
that occasion could have been in view, <hi rend="underline">liberty</hi> (and<lb/>
this in the sense in which it is synonymous to political<lb/>
security, security against bad government) liberty could<lb/>
have place.  The other is that in such a government<lb/>
in the instance <add>person</add> of a king any such quality as poetry<lb/>
if <del>poetry</del> by poetry be understood (as it must if any <gap/><lb/>
signification be <unclear>attached</unclear> to the word) a disposition to<lb/>
take <del>the</del> in the conduct of the government the maximum<lb/>
of utility as <del>the</del> and for the predominantly ruling principle.</p>
<p>&#9758; Then go on to shew how necessarily self willed a man is that<lb/>
there is rendered by what he <del>to</del> is continually bearing about his goodness, his<lb/>
wisdom &amp;c:  that with this<lb/>
political security is not<lb/>
consistent, &amp;c.<lb/>
<hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> yes:  the more<lb/>
<del>capable the more</del> <gap/><lb/>
the more agreeable.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:46, 13 December 2023

Click Here To Edit

6 July 1816
Polit. D

N Nunquam libertas gratior exstat
Quam sub rege pio.

The passage observation (it is in Claudian) is a celebrated one,
it is a plausible, an engaging one: and very considerable
it can scarcely be doubted – has been its influence.

Good in poetry it is proportionably bad in political deontology.
In deontology the goodness of the observations depends
on their correctness: in that exactness of their agreement to with
the truth of thing the nature the circumstances particulars of
the case whatever it may be: with good poetry any no such
exactness is compatible.

In this passage two suppositions are contended: neither
of them ever exemplified: neither of them consistent with
the nature of the case. One is – that under a king: viz. the
only king of the only sort of government that on
that occasion could have been in view, liberty (and
this in the sense in which it is synonymous to political
security, security against bad government) liberty could
have place. The other is that in such a government
in the instance person of a king any such quality as poetry
if poetry by poetry be understood (as it must if any
signification be attached to the word) a disposition to
take the in the conduct of the government the maximum
of utility as the and for the predominantly ruling principle.

☞ Then go on to shew how necessarily self willed a man is that
there is rendered by what he to is continually bearing about his goodness, his
wisdom &c: that with this
political security is not
consistent, &c.
yes: the more
capable the more
the more agreeable.


Identifier: | JB/015/067/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

1816-07-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

067

Info in main headings field

polit. d.

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

5283

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in