JB/081/381/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/381/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/381/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/381/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<head>1829 April 26 27 +<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>+ + 1<lb/>(5) 5</p> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>&sect;.2. Elucidations<lb/>&AElig;tiology and History</note></p> <p>The case is that as between single <sic>seatedness</sic> and<lb/>many <sic>seatedness,</sic> <add><sic>subserviency</sic></add> <del>the <unclear>quickest</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> subservient</del> to the<lb/><add>main</add> ends of <add><del>main</del></add> justice depends on circumstance: principally in<lb/>the degree of <add>national</add> civilization.  That  in every department of government<lb/>publicity <del>of the <gap/></del> is a security without which<lb/>all others will be ineffectual, in a proposition altogether <del>incontestable.</del> <add>above<lb/>dispute</add>  But to the efficiency of this secuirty it is not necessary<lb/>that the <del>witnesses to the</del> persons to whose cognizance<lb/>the exercise given to the power is subjected, should themselves<lb/>be <hi rend="underline">sharers</hi> in it: on the contrary, for another reason<lb/>it is essential that they should <hi rend="underline">not</hi>: <del>for as much as</del> for as the<lb/>number <add>which by the <sic>encease</sic></add> of such sharers <sic>encreases</sic> actual responsibility and<lb/>the sense of responsibility diminishes: <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] while <del>by</del> <add>from</add> <sic>encrease</sic><lb/>in the number of sharers<lb/><del>the</del> force of that check<lb/>receives diminution<lb/><del>by</del> <add>from</add> <sic>encrease</sic> in the<lb/>number of observers who<lb/><del>not be</del> are not sharers<lb/>in receives <sic>encrease</sic>.<lb/>In other words, in</note> <del>In</del> the <add>naturally constituted</add> Public Opinion<lb/>tribunal, the number of the seats can not be too great: in a<lb/>legally constituted judicial tribunal, <del>the</del> so long as number of<lb/>seats in the Public Opinion Tribunal opinion is <del>sufficient, the</del> <add>to a certain degree abundant<lb/>and well informed, the</add> number of seats can not be too small: number <hi rend="underline">one</hi> being<lb/>in truth the only number defensible.  But where the <hi rend="underline">Public<lb/>Opinion Tribunal</hi> either has no place or fails of being <del>adequate</del> <add>as above<lb/>in <sic>quorality</sic> or quality <del>adequate</del> competent</add> many <sic>seatedness</sic> in the legal Tribunal constitution, <add>a <foreign>succedaneum</foreign></add> how<lb/>so ever <del>and</del> <add>and</add> inadequate, <del> a <foreign>succedaneum</foreign></del> to a single seated <hi rend="underline">legal</hi><lb/>Tribunal with a Public Opinion Tribunal to watch over it</p> <p> In the <del>Ch</del> <add>small</add> numerous and <del><gap/></del> local <hi rend="underline"><unclear>Judicature</unclear></hi><lb/>which the Norman conquest extinguished, and <del><gap/> the</del> <add>which, in</add> principle<lb/><del>of which</del> are in <add>and by</add> the here proposed system revived, &#x2014; the <del><add> power of the</add> Public<lb/>Opinion Tribunal</del> <unclear>salutary</unclear> power of the Public Opinion possessed the<lb/>utmost degree of efficiency, <del><gap/></del> which, <del>the degree of <gap/></del><lb/>while printing was unknown and even writing <del>rare</del> nay<lb/>even reading rarer, <del><gap/> of</del> the state of society admitted<lb/>of.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:03, 4 January 2024

Click Here To Edit

1829 April 26 27 +
Petitions

+ + 1
(5) 5

Supplement
§.2. Elucidations
Ætiology and History

The case is that as between single seatedness and
many seatedness, subserviency the quickest subservient to the
main ends of main justice depends on circumstance: principally in
the degree of national civilization. That in every department of government
publicity of the is a security without which
all others will be ineffectual, in a proposition altogether incontestable. above
dispute
But to the efficiency of this secuirty it is not necessary
that the witnesses to the persons to whose cognizance
the exercise given to the power is subjected, should themselves
be sharers in it: on the contrary, for another reason
it is essential that they should not: for as much as for as the
number which by the encease of such sharers encreases actual responsibility and
the sense of responsibility diminishes: [+] [+] while by from encrease
in the number of sharers
the force of that check
receives diminution
by from encrease in the
number of observers who
not be are not sharers
in receives encrease.
In other words, in
In the naturally constituted Public Opinion
tribunal, the number of the seats can not be too great: in a
legally constituted judicial tribunal, the so long as number of
seats in the Public Opinion Tribunal opinion is sufficient, the to a certain degree abundant
and well informed, the
number of seats can not be too small: number one being
in truth the only number defensible. But where the Public
Opinion Tribunal
either has no place or fails of being adequate as above
in quorality or quality adequate competent
many seatedness in the legal Tribunal constitution, a succedaneum how
so ever and and inadequate, a succedaneum to a single seated legal
Tribunal with a Public Opinion Tribunal to watch over it

In the Ch small numerous and local Judicature
which the Norman conquest extinguished, and the which, in principle
of which are in and by the here proposed system revived, — the power of the Public
Opinion Tribunal
salutary power of the Public Opinion possessed the
utmost degree of efficiency, which, the degree of
while printing was unknown and even writing rare nay
even reading rarer, of the state of society admitted
of.



Identifier: | JB/081/381/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

381

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / d5 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

26168

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in