JB/081/404/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/404/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/081/404/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 April 3<lb/>Petition</head> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>&sect;.2. Elucidation<lb/>Concluding Note?</note></p> <p><note>Right and Wrong<lb/>pronounced by 5 Judges</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Objections calumny<lb/>&amp; <sic>personnality</sic> answered</note></p> <p><add>Calumny! calumny!</add> <sic>Personnality! personality!</sic> <del>how horrible</del> Oh horridest<lb/>horror! Blush blush though sun! stand back though rapid<lb/>decree.  Easter, <gap/>, <gap/> all commencing crumble</p> <p>And into chaos pulverise the world:  For Bombadantula<lb/>received a blow and &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; <gap/> decent.</p> <p>No need has the world of any such <unclear>pulveridation</unclear>.<lb/><del><gap/></del> Calumny, not any: for if the affection thus made<lb/>not a single one of them is there the talk of which is not<lb/>invariably notorious: not a single one of them to which <add>a <unclear>danger</unclear> of</add> <lb/>any one of the learned persons in question will venture to set<lb/>his name</p> <p>Personality not any: Why? Because what is <add>here</add> predicated<lb/>of these individuals is predicated not merely of<lb/>these same individuals but of these in common with every<lb/>other individual by whom the same situation ever has been<lb/>or is likely ever to be <unclear>fitted</unclear></p> <p>I have not so much as looked at the causes</p> <!-- line in pencil across the page --><p><note>12<lb/>If instead of four<lb/>there were but one<lb/>that one would have<lb/>greater effect as to<lb/>probative force than<lb/>all four together</note></p> <p>If instead of all four names there was but one<lb/>single name, that one name, whichever it was would operate<lb/>in my mind in respect of probative force <del>it</del> will <gap/> to<lb/>veracity and rectitude of the declared opinion with incomparably<lb/>greater probative force than that of all four: Why? Because<lb/>his would be individual responsibility: effective responsibility, eventual exposure to the censure of the public opinion<lb/>tribunal: in a word reputation in some <gap/> at stake</p> <p>Before <gap/> <gap/> a recent <add>referenced</add> publication by an <gap/><lb/>destitute of literary merit in which single seated judicatories<lb/>and <gap/> seated judicatories are brought forth in the same<lb/>breath and placed on a line with each other in respect<lb/>of <gap/> to adoption a given mass of experience with twelve<lb/>times that mass not to speak of the difference as above in<lb/>respect of appropriate aptitude!</p> <p>Half <del>will</del> <add>worth</add> more than the whole, is a <unclear>paradise</unclear> uttered <add>sung out</add><lb/>by a <gap/> <unclear>Peal</unclear>: a fifth part worth more than the whole, is<lb/>a <unclear>paradise</unclear> <del>exemplified here as</del> here not sung <del>but</del> indeed<lb/><add>but</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin -->but what is more <add>material</add> exemplified<lb/>and verified</p>
<head>1829 April 3<lb/>Petition</head> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>&sect;.2. Elucidation<lb/>Concluding Note?</note></p> <p><note>Right and Wrong<lb/>pronounced by 5 Judges</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Objections calumny<lb/>&amp; <sic>personnality</sic> answered</note></p> <p><add>Calumny! calumny!</add> <sic>Personnality! personality!</sic> <del>how horrible</del> Oh horridest<lb/>horror! Blush blush though seen! stand back though rapid<lb/><unclear>decree</unclear>.  <gap/>, Mountains, <gap/> all commonly crumble<lb/>And into chaos pulverise the world:  For Bombadantula<lb/>received a blow and &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; <unclear>entire decent</unclear>.</p> <p>No need has the world of any such <unclear>pulveridation</unclear>.<lb/><del><gap/></del> Calumny, not any: for if the affection thus made<lb/>not a single one of them is there the talk of which is not<lb/>invariably notorious: not a single one of them to which <add>a <unclear>danger</unclear> of</add> <lb/>any one of the learned persons in question will venture to set<lb/>his name</p> <p>Personality not any: Why? Because what is <add>here</add> predicated<lb/>of these individuals is predicated not merely of<lb/>these same individuals but of these in common with every<lb/>other individual by whom the same situation ever has been<lb/>or is likely ever to be <unclear>fitted</unclear></p> <p>I have not so much as looked at the causes</p> <!-- line in pencil across the page --><p><note>12<lb/>If instead of four<lb/>there were but one<lb/>that one would have<lb/>greater effect as to<lb/>probative force than<lb/>all four together</note></p> <p>If instead of all four names there was but one<lb/>single name, that one name, whichever it was would operate<lb/>in my mind in respect of probative force <del>it</del> will <unclear>stand</unclear> to<lb/>veracity and rectitude of the declared opinion with incomparably<lb/>greater probative force than that of all four: Why? Because<lb/>his would be individual responsibility: effective responsibility,<lb/>eventual exposure to the censure of the public opinion<lb/>tribunal: in a word reputation in some <gap/> at stake</p> <p>Before <unclear>me too</unclear> a recent <add>referenced</add> publication by a <gap/><lb/>destitute of literary merit in which single seated judicatories<lb/>and twelve seated judicatories are brought forth in the same<lb/>breath and placed on a line with each other in respect<lb/>of <gap/> to adoption a given mass of experience with twelve<lb/>times that mass not to speak of the difference as above in<lb/>respect of appropriate aptitude!</p> <p>Half <del>will</del> <add>worth</add> more than the whole, is a <unclear>paradise</unclear> uttered <add>sung out</add><lb/>by a <gap/> <unclear>Peal</unclear>: a fifth part worth more than the whole, is<lb/>a <unclear>paradise</unclear> <del>exemplified here as</del> here not sung <del>but</del> indeed<lb/><add>but</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin -->but what is more <add>material</add> exemplified<lb/>and verified</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:37, 15 January 2024

Click Here To Edit

1829 April 3
Petition

Supplement
§.2. Elucidation
Concluding Note?

Right and Wrong
pronounced by 5 Judges

11
Objections calumny
& personnality answered

Calumny! calumny! Personnality! personality! how horrible Oh horridest
horror! Blush blush though seen! stand back though rapid
decree. , Mountains, all commonly crumble
And into chaos pulverise the world: For Bombadantula
received a blow and — — — — entire decent.

No need has the world of any such pulveridation.
Calumny, not any: for if the affection thus made
not a single one of them is there the talk of which is not
invariably notorious: not a single one of them to which a danger of
any one of the learned persons in question will venture to set
his name

Personality not any: Why? Because what is here predicated
of these individuals is predicated not merely of
these same individuals but of these in common with every
other individual by whom the same situation ever has been
or is likely ever to be fitted

I have not so much as looked at the causes

12
If instead of four
there were but one
that one would have
greater effect as to
probative force than
all four together

If instead of all four names there was but one
single name, that one name, whichever it was would operate
in my mind in respect of probative force it will stand to
veracity and rectitude of the declared opinion with incomparably
greater probative force than that of all four: Why? Because
his would be individual responsibility: effective responsibility,
eventual exposure to the censure of the public opinion
tribunal: in a word reputation in some at stake

Before me too a recent referenced publication by a
destitute of literary merit in which single seated judicatories
and twelve seated judicatories are brought forth in the same
breath and placed on a line with each other in respect
of to adoption a given mass of experience with twelve
times that mass not to speak of the difference as above in
respect of appropriate aptitude!

Half will worth more than the whole, is a paradise uttered sung out
by a Peal: a fifth part worth more than the whole, is
a paradise exemplified here as here not sung but indeed
but
but what is more material exemplified
and verified



Identifier: | JB/081/404/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-12

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

404

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

26191

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in