JB/081/417/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/417/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1830 March 29 <lb/>J.B. to House</head> <p><note>II. Summary Procedure</note><lb/>3</p> <p><note>8</note></p> <p>8. That whatsoever may be the amount of such defalcation, still<lb/>the said proposed system remains in the whole compasses of it in a<lb/>state of <del>couple</del> dual opposition to the uncontested and <gap/><lb/>ends of justice, having if not first object its sure and altogether<lb/><sic>indisprovable</sic> effect, <del>the compliance</del> so long as it shall sustain<lb/>an operation the continuance of the needless delay, sale and denial<lb/>of justice</p> <p><note>9</note></p> <p>9. That <add>neither</add> for the explanation nor for the justification of <del>the ch</del><lb/>those arrangements the continuance of which is virtually proposed<lb/>and recommended any more than for such as are proposed to be<lb/>substituted, no principle, no reason no touchstone of<lb/>propriety no instrument of guidance</p> <p><note>10.</note></p> <p>10. That though it could not but be known to them<lb/>that the utter incompetence of the system the competence of<lb/>which was the object of their endeavours had been declared in the<lb/>public practice and in <gap/> in the periodicals of the day<lb?>by your petition in the most pointed terms that declaration<lb?>having for its <del><gap/></del> support reason no less than <gap/><lb/><gap/> and unmemorable <add><sic>uncontestable</sic></add> yet so it is that by these same<lb/>Commissioners <add>functionaries</add> perfect silence in regard to such his <gap/><lb/>has therefore been maintained: and while <gap/> calling for<lb/>communication on the subject were sent by them to men<lb/>of all classes in the profession urged by the <gap/> pressing form<lb/>of <del>particular</del> present and other particular interests be to give<lb/>continuance and as far as possible <sic>encrease</sic> to the abuse to the<lb/>whole system of abuse, <add>yet to your Petition</add> <del>such communication has</del> on whom<lb?>as is so will have no such instrument of error been any application<lb/>and when study of the subject had taken its commencement<lb/>before by for the greater part of them were born no such communication<lb/>has ever been made.</p>
<head>1830 March 29 <lb/>J.B. to House</head> <p><note>II. Summary Procedure</note><lb/>3</p> <p><note>8</note></p> <p>8. That whatsoever may be the amount of such defalcation, still<lb/>the said proposed system remains in the whole compass of it in a<lb/>state of <del>couple</del> dual opposition to the uncontested and uncontestable<lb/>ends of justice, having if not for its object its sure and altogether<lb/><sic>indisprovable</sic> effect, <del>the continuance</del> so long as it shall continue<lb/>in operation the continuance of the needless delay, sale and denial<lb/>of justice</p> <p><note>9</note></p> <p>9. That <add>neither</add> for the explanation nor for the justification of <del>the ch</del><lb/>those arrangements the continuance of which is virtually proposed<lb/>and recommended any more than for such as are proposed to be<lb/>substituted, no principle, no reason no touchstone of<lb/>propriety no instrument of guidance</p> <p><note>10.</note></p> <p>10. That though it could not but be known to them<lb/>that the utter incompetency of the system the competence of<lb/>which was the object of their endeavours had been declared in the<lb/>public practice and in particular in the periodicals of the day<lb/>by your Petition in the most pointed terms that declaration<lb/>having for its <del><gap/></del> support reason no less <unclear>short</unclear> than conclusive<lb/>and unmemorable <add><sic>uncontestable</sic></add>: yet so it is that by these same<lb/>Commissioners <add>functionaries</add> perfect silence in regard to such his <unclear>distinction</unclear><lb/>has therefore been maintained: and while queries calling for<lb/>communication on the subject were sent by them to men<lb/>of all classes in the profession urged by the most pressing form<lb/>of <del>particular</del> present and other particular interests to be given<lb/>continuance and as far as possible <sic>encrease</sic> to the abuse to the<lb/>whole system of abuse, <add>yet to your Petitioner</add> <del>such communication has</del> on whom<lb/>as is so well known no such instrument of error been any application<lb/>and whose study of the subject had taken its commencement<lb/>before by far the greater part of them were born no such communication<lb/>has been ever made.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:29, 26 January 2024

Click Here To Edit

1830 March 29
J.B. to House

II. Summary Procedure
3

8

8. That whatsoever may be the amount of such defalcation, still
the said proposed system remains in the whole compass of it in a
state of couple dual opposition to the uncontested and uncontestable
ends of justice, having if not for its object its sure and altogether
indisprovable effect, the continuance so long as it shall continue
in operation the continuance of the needless delay, sale and denial
of justice

9

9. That neither for the explanation nor for the justification of the ch
those arrangements the continuance of which is virtually proposed
and recommended any more than for such as are proposed to be
substituted, no principle, no reason no touchstone of
propriety no instrument of guidance

10.

10. That though it could not but be known to them
that the utter incompetency of the system the competence of
which was the object of their endeavours had been declared in the
public practice and in particular in the periodicals of the day
by your Petition in the most pointed terms that declaration
having for its support reason no less short than conclusive
and unmemorable uncontestable: yet so it is that by these same
Commissioners functionaries perfect silence in regard to such his distinction
has therefore been maintained: and while queries calling for
communication on the subject were sent by them to men
of all classes in the profession urged by the most pressing form
of particular present and other particular interests to be given
continuance and as far as possible encrease to the abuse to the
whole system of abuse, yet to your Petitioner such communication has on whom
as is so well known no such instrument of error been any application
and whose study of the subject had taken its commencement
before by far the greater part of them were born no such communication
has been ever made.



Identifier: | JB/081/417/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1830-03-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-10

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

417

Info in main headings field

jb to house

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

26204

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in