★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1828 Aug. 7<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- figures and marginal summaries in pencil --> <p>8<lb/><note>Beginning</note><lb/>3</p> <p><note>These distinctions of<lb/>different cases of possession<lb/>are immaterial — their<lb/>origin in feudal times</note></p><p>Altogether immaterial in themselves are the distinctions<lb/>between the <unclear>several</unclear> case designated respectively by the appellations<lb/>of possession — <del><add>ac</add> right</del> apparent right of possession, actual right of<lb/>possession and right of property: but of the state of thought<lb/>in the widely <unclear>distant</unclear> time called feudal times, sprang the<lb/>positions for making these distinctions.</p> <p><note>Labour secure to comprehend<lb/>them — success<lb/>precarious</note></p> <p>Secure would be the labour of endeavouring to comprehend<lb/>them: precarious the success of the attempt.</p> <p><note>Right or no right only<lb/>proper question</note></p> <p>Have you <add>I</add> a right, or have you <add>I</add> not? that is <hi rend="underline">a</hi> proper<lb/>question: that <hi rend="underline">the</hi> only one.</p> <p><note>Without consent of certain<lb/>person can you derive<lb/>benefit from the<lb/>thing in question without<lb/>a suit? Of this question<lb/>your interest to be always<lb/>satisfied.</note></p> <p>Without or against the consent of a certain person or<lb/>persons respectively, may you derive for the thing in question the<lb/>benefit in question — without having recourse to a suit at law?<lb/>this is the question <del>which</del> the same question which <add>in relation</add> on every occasion<lb/>it is your interest to be satisfied.</p> <p><note>Power <unclear>absqualilegational</unclear><lb/>in relation to habitation moveable<lb/>or immoveable (Ship)</note></p> <p>Power <unclear>absqualilegational</unclear> in relation to his habitationed<lb/><gap/> moveable or immoveable (— a <gap/> <gap/>)</p> <p>Power of <del>early and <gap/></del> continuance or command<lb/>of <gap/> without public consent but not against <unclear>contemporary</unclear><lb/>inhibition</p> <p>2. Power in relation to person for the purpose of receiving<lb/><unclear>particulars</unclear> in this subject matter, or other obstruction to the use of it<lb/>— power of <add>physical</add> ejection without violence</p> <p>3. <sic>D<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> even by violence</p> <p>4. Power of inviting assistance for the purpose of ejection —<lb/><gap/> : viz. of 1 a functionary <foreign>ad <gap/></foreign>; 2 any other<lb/>price at large</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1828 Aug. 7
Blackstone
8
Beginning
3
These distinctions of
different cases of possession
are immaterial — their
origin in feudal times
Altogether immaterial in themselves are the distinctions
between the several case designated respectively by the appellations
of possession — ac right apparent right of possession, actual right of
possession and right of property: but of the state of thought
in the widely distant time called feudal times, sprang the
positions for making these distinctions.
Labour secure to comprehend
them — success
precarious
Secure would be the labour of endeavouring to comprehend
them: precarious the success of the attempt.
Right or no right only
proper question
Have you I a right, or have you I not? that is a proper
question: that the only one.
Without consent of certain
person can you derive
benefit from the
thing in question without
a suit? Of this question
your interest to be always
satisfied.
Without or against the consent of a certain person or
persons respectively, may you derive for the thing in question the
benefit in question — without having recourse to a suit at law?
this is the question which the same question which in relation on every occasion
it is your interest to be satisfied.
Power absqualilegational
in relation to habitation moveable
or immoveable (Ship)
Power absqualilegational in relation to his habitationed
moveable or immoveable (— a )
Power of early and continuance or command
of without public consent but not against contemporary
inhibition
2. Power in relation to person for the purpose of receiving
particulars in this subject matter, or other obstruction to the use of it
— power of physical ejection without violence
3. Do even by violence
4. Power of inviting assistance for the purpose of ejection —
: viz. of 1 a functionary ad ; 2 any other
price at large
|
Identifier: | JB/031/020/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-08-07 |
not numbered |
||
|
031 |
civil code |
||
|
020 |
blackstone |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d8 / e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1828 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1828 |
|||
|
9706 |
|||
