JB/031/033/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/031/033/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1828 <sic>Sept.</sic> 27<lb/>Blackstone on Civil Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch. Univ.</sic></note><lb/>(2 <note>&sect; <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>Analysis</note></p> <p><hi rend="underline">Reliance</hi> its relation to <hi rend="underline">conveyance</hi><lb/>Release as for an obligation</p> <!-- text to the right of this --> <p>Obligatory persons interest <gap/><lb/>correspondent <hi rend="underline">releases</hi>.</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Both expressive of<lb/>will &#x2014; by both <sic>burthen</sic><lb/>as well as benefit produced</note></p> <p>Both are expressive of will: of will to which if<lb/>the government <del>gives all</del> hands to them its sanction it<lb/><add>by so doing</add> gives the force of law</p> <p><note>8<lb/>In the case of conveyance<lb/>benefit the most prominent<lb/>is that of<lb/>obligatory promises<lb/>the <sic>burthen</sic></note></p> <p><add>By both of them, <sic><hi rend="underline">burthen</hi></sic> as well as benefit is produced<lb/>But in the case of an act of transmission &#x2014; say<lb/>a conveyance &#x2014; <del>it is</del> <hi rend="underline">benefit</hi> <del>such that</del> <add>is that one</add> of the two objects<lb/>which stands most prominently in view: in the case<lb/>of an <add>a legally</add> obligatory promise, or even in the case of a pair<lb/>of reciprocally obligatory promises, <del>it is</del> <sic><hi rend="underline">burthen</hi></sic> is<lb/>that which stands most prominently in view.</p> <p><note>9<lb/>To the receiver in<lb/>the case of conveyance<lb/>the benefit manifest</note></p> <p>That to <add>one party</add> the receiver a benefit <del>of</del> is a result<lb/>if <del>an</del> <add>the</add> act of transmission &#x2014; the thing transmitted being <del>regarded</del> <add>understood</add><lb/>to have its value is manifest</p> <p><note>10<lb/>The burthen lies<lb/>upon him in whose<lb/>possession the subject<lb/>matter was</note></p> <p>Now then as to the <sic>burthen</sic> &#x2014; where does it lie.<lb/>Answer it lies upon <del>the</del> him in whose possession the subject<lb/>matter was at the <del>time</del> moment of the act of transmission,<lb/>and this whether he were the person by whom that act is<lb/>performed, as is most commonly the case or some other person,<lb/>as in some instances is the case</p> <p>&#9758; <unclear>State Doctrine</unclear> speak here?</p> <p><note>11<lb/>Example the table<lb?>on which I write if<lb/>transferred by me<lb/>to you &#x2014; the benefit<lb/>accruing to you the<lb/><sic>burthen</sic> of transmission<lb/>rests on me</note></p> <p>Take for instance the table on which I write.  If<lb/>I <sic>transmitt</sic> it to you &#x2014; <del>suppose great <gap/></del> say for a price<lb/>you buying it of me: the benefit of <del>the transmission</del> <add>this dealing</add> in so<lb/>far as the <gap/> is the subject matter, accrues exclusively<lb/>to you.  On the other hand the <sic>burthen</sic> <del>falls</del> lies<lb/>exclusively on me.  So likewise if instead of myself<lb/>the <gap/> the person by whom the act of transmission is<lb/>performed is &#x2014; <del>the</del> <add>a</add> Judge acting as <gap/></p> <p>I say exclusively: and <hi rend="underline">that</hi> to the exclusion of all other<lb/>persons: for, though to your deriving from the act the benefit intended<lb/>it is necessary that all the other persons should abstain<lb/>from <del>using it</del> occupying it in doing any thing in relation to it<lb/>any thing by which in value to you might be lessened, yet this<lb/><add><sic>burthen</sic></add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> <sic>burthen</sic> remains after the<lb/>Sale on the same shoulders<lb/>as it lay upon before</p>
<head>1828 <sic>Sept.</sic> 27<lb/>Blackstone on Civil Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ch. Univ.</sic></note><lb/>(2 <note>&sect; Contracts Legal Dealings<lb/>Analysis</note></p> <p><hi rend="underline">Release</hi> its relation to <hi rend="underline">conveyance</hi><lb/>Release as for an obligation</p> <!-- text to the right of this --> <p>Obligatory persons interests include<lb/>correspondent <hi rend="underline">releases</hi>.</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Both expressive of<lb/>will &#x2014; by both <sic>burthen</sic><lb/>as well as benefit produced</note></p> <p>Both are expressions of will: of will to which if<lb/>the government <del>gives all</del> hands to them its sanction it<lb/><add>by so doing</add> gives the force of law</p> <p><note>8<lb/>In the case of conveyance<lb/>benefit the most prominent<lb/>is that of<lb/>obligatory promises<lb/>the <sic><hi rend="underline">burthen</hi></sic></note></p> <p><add>By both of them, <sic><hi rend="underline">burthen</hi></sic> as well as benefit is produced</add><lb/>But in the case of an act of transmission &#x2014; say<lb/>a conveyance &#x2014; <del>it is</del> <hi rend="underline">benefit</hi> <del>such that</del> <add>is that one</add> of the two objects<lb/>which stands most prominently in view: in the case<lb/>of an <add>a legally</add> obligatory promise, or even in the case of a pair<lb/>of reciprocally obligatory promises, <del>it is</del> <sic><hi rend="underline">burthen</hi></sic> is<lb/>that which stands most prominently on view.</p> <p><note>9<lb/>To the receiver in<lb/>the case of conveyances<lb/>the benefit manifest</note></p> <p>That to <add>one party</add> the receiver a benefit <del>of</del> is a result<lb/>if <del>an</del> <add>the</add> act of transmission &#x2014; the thing transmitted being <del>regarded</del> <add>understood</add><lb/>to have its value is manifest</p> <p><note>10<lb/>The burthen lies<lb/>upon him in whose<lb/>possession the subject<lb/>matter was</note></p> <p>Now then as to the <sic>burthen</sic> &#x2014; where does it lie.<lb/>Answer it lies upon <del>the</del> him in whose possession the subject<lb/>matter was at the <del>time</del> moment of the act of transmission,<lb/>and this whether he were the person by whom that act is<lb/>performed, as is most commonly the case or some other person,<lb/>as in some instances is the case</p> <p>&#9758; <unclear>State Doctrine</unclear> speak here?</p> <p><note>11<lb/>Example the table<lb/>on which I write if<lb/>transferred by me<lb/>to you &#x2014; the benefit<lb/>accruing to you the<lb/><sic>burthen</sic> of transmission<lb/>rests on me</note></p> <p>Take for instance the table on which I write.  If<lb/>I <sic>transmitt</sic> it to you &#x2014; <del>suppose great <gap/></del> say for a price<lb/>you buying it of me: the benefit of <del>the transmission</del> <add>this dealing</add> in so<lb/>far as the table is the subject matter, accrues exclusively<lb/>to you.  On the other hand the <sic>burthen</sic> <del>falls</del> lies<lb/>exclusively on me.  So likewise if instead of myself<lb/>the owner the person by whom the act of transmission is<lb/>performed is &#x2014; <del>the</del> <add>a</add> Judge acting as <unclear>such</unclear></p> <p>I say exclusively: and <hi rend="underline">that</hi> to the exclusion of all other<lb/>persons: for, though to your deriving from the act the benefit intended<lb/>it is necessary that all the other persons should abstain<lb/>from <del>using it</del> occupying it or doing any thing in relation to it<lb/>any thing by which its value to you might be lessened, yet this<lb/><add><sic>burthen</sic></add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> <sic>burthen</sic> remains after the<lb/>sale on the same shoulders<lb/>as it lay upon before</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:19, 8 February 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 Sept. 27
Blackstone on Civil Code

Ch. Univ.
(2 § Contracts Legal Dealings
Analysis

Release its relation to conveyance
Release as for an obligation

Obligatory persons interests include
correspondent releases.

7
Both expressive of
will — by both burthen
as well as benefit produced

Both are expressions of will: of will to which if
the government gives all hands to them its sanction it
by so doing gives the force of law

8
In the case of conveyance
benefit the most prominent
is that of
obligatory promises
the burthen

By both of them, burthen as well as benefit is produced
But in the case of an act of transmission — say
a conveyance — it is benefit such that is that one of the two objects
which stands most prominently in view: in the case
of an a legally obligatory promise, or even in the case of a pair
of reciprocally obligatory promises, it is burthen is
that which stands most prominently on view.

9
To the receiver in
the case of conveyances
the benefit manifest

That to one party the receiver a benefit of is a result
if an the act of transmission — the thing transmitted being regarded understood
to have its value is manifest

10
The burthen lies
upon him in whose
possession the subject
matter was

Now then as to the burthen — where does it lie.
Answer it lies upon the him in whose possession the subject
matter was at the time moment of the act of transmission,
and this whether he were the person by whom that act is
performed, as is most commonly the case or some other person,
as in some instances is the case

State Doctrine speak here?

11
Example the table
on which I write if
transferred by me
to you — the benefit
accruing to you the
burthen of transmission
rests on me

Take for instance the table on which I write. If
I transmitt it to you — suppose great say for a price
you buying it of me: the benefit of the transmission this dealing in so
far as the table is the subject matter, accrues exclusively
to you. On the other hand the burthen falls lies
exclusively on me. So likewise if instead of myself
the owner the person by whom the act of transmission is
performed is — the a Judge acting as such

I say exclusively: and that to the exclusion of all other
persons: for, though to your deriving from the act the benefit intended
it is necessary that all the other persons should abstain
from using it occupying it or doing any thing in relation to it
any thing by which its value to you might be lessened, yet this
burthen
burthen remains after the
sale on the same shoulders
as it lay upon before



Identifier: | JB/031/033/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-09-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-11

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

033

Info in main headings field

blackstone or civil code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9719

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in