JB/118/286/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/286/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->25 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1812</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>What is the intimation here meant to be conveyed?<lb/>
 
that <add>in</add> the stile of argument the mode of reasoning employed<lb/>
 
in those works or either of them that uses any<lb/>
 
<del>thing is considered any</del> want of candour or security<lb/>
and unbecoming levity?  The works <del>speak</del> <add>make answers</add> for <del>of</del> themselves:<lb/>
but <del>a much <gap/> shorter</del> one answer and<lb/>
of that sort which to the bulk of readers will be as much<lb/>
more satisfactorily as it – <gap/> shall be given <del>from</del> <add>as</add><lb/>
the words of that same <add>most</add> profound lawyer and two of<lb/>
them most distinguished philanthropists the lawyer<lb/>
viz M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Justice Blackstone being it is supposed one<lb/>
of <gap/> themselves.</p>
<p>In return for a copy of the View of the Hard Labour<lb/>
Bill, here follows a note from M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Justice Blackstone.</p>
<p>On the subject of the latest of the two works being<lb/>
<del>in and for aught appear the</del> <add>the only one more spoken of</add> by the worthy Baronet, and<lb/>
for aught appears the only one that has ever been in his<lb/>
hands, here follows <add>an extract of</add> a letter from M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Eden <del><gap/></del> <add>now</add> Lord<lb/>
Auckland.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:07, 12 February 2024

Click Here To Edit

25 Jany 1812

What is the intimation here meant to be conveyed?
that in the stile of argument the mode of reasoning employed
in those works or either of them that uses any
thing is considered any want of candour or security
and unbecoming levity? The works speak make answers for of themselves:
but a much shorter one answer and
of that sort which to the bulk of readers will be as much
more satisfactorily as it – shall be given from as
the words of that same most profound lawyer and two of
them most distinguished philanthropists the lawyer
viz Mr Justice Blackstone being it is supposed one
of themselves.

In return for a copy of the View of the Hard Labour
Bill, here follows a note from Mr Justice Blackstone.

On the subject of the latest of the two works being
in and for aught appear the the only one more spoken of by the worthy Baronet, and
for aught appears the only one that has ever been in his
hands, here follows an extract of a letter from Mr Eden now Lord
Auckland.


Identifier: | JB/118/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

1812-01-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

286

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

39340

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in