JB/118/306/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/306/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/306/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/306/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->20 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1812<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>The Hobby Horse was his <unclear>own</unclear> hand.</p>
 
<p>Not to speak of gentlemen at large and any one of them<lb/>
 
capable of affording <add><unclear>arising</unclear> as</add> a <unclear>common</unclear> demand of introduction or<lb/>
reintroduction <add>some</add> half a dozen at least might be mentioned<lb/>
<add>of the class of public men</add> to whom <add>in respect</add> the Penitentiary establishment in general, and the<lb/>
Panopticon modification of it in particular being <del>an</del> objects<lb/>
of known interest, and who having all of them the advantage<lb/>
if in acquaintance with the worthy Baronet could not but<lb/>
from them to him have <unclear>conversed</unclear> with him<lb/>
upon the subject so frequently as it had happened to them<lb/>
to do <unclear>me</unclear> the honour of <unclear>conversing</unclear> on it with one<lb/>
Sir Charles <unclear>Bunbury</unclear>, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Wilberforce, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Moreton Pitt<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Henry Thornton:  it is needless to look out for more.<lb/>
Of these <del>as from</del> unless M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Moreton Pitt be an exception<lb/>
there was <add>is</add> not one that has not stood <del><gap/></del> up declaring <del>his</del><lb/>
in <del>of</del> Parliament the favourite opinion entertained by him<lb/>
as well of the Panopticon plan as of its <unclear>invention</unclear>.</p>
<p>As to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Moreton <add>Pitt</add> if so it be that he did not<lb/>
do exactly this, what he did do was a great deal <unclear>worse</unclear>.</p>
<p>The same situation and incident produces different effects<lb/>
in different minds</p>
<p>I cannot fairly judge between a favourite child<lb/>
of my own nurture, and an untried theory of an ingenious<lb/>
and inventive imagination, placed before me but yesterday.<lb/>
in the instance of the worthy Baronet  The<lb/>
confession, though <add>over and over</add> retracted before as well as after its being<lb/>
made <del>is</del> <add>will be found</add> no less true than candid.  In the <del>case</del> <add><del>case</del> mouth</add> of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>
Moreton Pitt it would not have been <add>have been far indeed</add> true.  He too<lb/>
had a favourite child, <gap/> <unclear>German</unclear> to that of the worthy<lb/>
Baronet:  he being his upon the peg, and became a<lb/>
true <gap/> father of man.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:55, 12 February 2024

Click Here To Edit

20 Jany 1812
Evidence

The Hobby Horse was his own hand.

Not to speak of gentlemen at large and any one of them
capable of affording arising as a common demand of introduction or
reintroduction some half a dozen at least might be mentioned
of the class of public men to whom in respect the Penitentiary establishment in general, and the
Panopticon modification of it in particular being an objects
of known interest, and who having all of them the advantage
if in acquaintance with the worthy Baronet could not but
from them to him have conversed with him
upon the subject so frequently as it had happened to them
to do me the honour of conversing on it with one
Sir Charles Bunbury, Mr Wilberforce, Mr Moreton Pitt
Mr Henry Thornton: it is needless to look out for more.
Of these as from unless Mr Moreton Pitt be an exception
there was is not one that has not stood up declaring his
in of Parliament the favourite opinion entertained by him
as well of the Panopticon plan as of its invention.

As to Mr Moreton Pitt if so it be that he did not
do exactly this, what he did do was a great deal worse.

The same situation and incident produces different effects
in different minds

I cannot fairly judge between a favourite child
of my own nurture, and an untried theory of an ingenious
and inventive imagination, placed before me but yesterday.
in the instance of the worthy Baronet The
confession, though over and over retracted before as well as after its being
made is will be found no less true than candid. In the case case mouth of Mr
Moreton Pitt it would not have been have been far indeed true. He too
had a favourite child, German to that of the worthy
Baronet: he being his upon the peg, and became a
true father of man.


Identifier: | JB/118/306/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

1812-01-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

306

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7 / e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

39360

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in