JB/031/053/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/031/053/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1828 <sic>Oct.</sic> 8<lb/>Blackstone or Civil Code</head> <p><note>Subject matter<lb/>III. Services.<lb/>1 Money. Service</note></p> <p>III. Third class of subject matters of property <add>right</add> &#x2014; Services<lb/> obligatory services</p> <p><note>Subject matters of<lb/>property 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> class<lb/>obligatory services<lb/>class 1. Obligatory service<lb/>pecuniary</note></p> <p>1. <add>First</add> Class of <del.<gap/></del> obligatory services.  Pecuniary or say<lb/>Money services &#x2014; services consisting in the payment of money<lb/><del>as to</del> <add>which may be</add>in manner liquidated or unliquidated.</p> <p><note>No individual article<lb/>the subject matter of<lb/>this right</note></p> <p>To this head may be no other head can the subject<lb/>matter of <add>the</add> right in question be referred to with propriety<lb/>be said to belong.  Why?  Answer.  Because no individual<lb/>article belonging either to the class of immoveable or to the<lb/>class of movables is ever the subject matter of it: the service<lb/>is rendered the correspondent obligation is fulfilled<lb/>by the delivery of any individual piece of money which<lb/>service at the <gap/> of the <del><gap/></del> <sic>obligee,</sic> provided the value<lb/>of them is that which is the subject matter of the right.</p> <p><note>If <add>an</add> individual piece <del>or<lb/>pieces</del> of money the<lb/>subject matter <del>th</del> of the<lb/>right it becomes an<lb/>Article of movables<lb/>and the service no<lb/>longer a mere pecuniary<lb/>service</note></p> <p>What may happen is that an individual piece<lb/>of money or <del>any on</del> individual pieces of money in any<lb/>greater number are the subject matters to which the demandant<lb/>lays claim: as for example pieces to which<lb/>their <del>being piece of foreign</del> <add>having been</add> manufactured <del>in</del> <add>under</add> some foreign<lb/>government or under the government of the state in which<lb/>has given to them in the eyes of the public <del>at large</del> <add>in general</add><lb/>or in the eyes of the demandant in particular, an extra<lb/>value.  In this case the right has <add>indeed</add> for its subject matter<lb/>a certain article or set of articles belonging to the class of<lb/>movables: for <del>the</del> by pieces other than the individual<lb/>piece in question the obligation can not be fulfilled.<lb/>But by the description thus given of it this second case is<lb/><sic>shewn</sic> to be a different one from the first <add>that in question</add>.</p> <p>&#9758; After of before <sic>shewing</sic> the difference between the case of <gap/> liquidated<lb/>and <gap/> not liquidated proceed to state the <gap/> efficient causes<lb/>of right and <gap/> or right: observing ow much more numerous they are<lb/><add>in</add><lb/> <!-- continues in the margin --> in the case of this specie of<lb/>subject matter than any<lb/>other.</p>
<head>1828 <sic>Oct.</sic> 8<lb/>Blackstone or Civil Code</head> <p><note>Subject matter<lb/>III. Services.<lb/>1 Money. Service</note></p> <p>III. Third class of subject matters of property <add>right</add> &#x2014; Services<lb/> obligatory services</p> <p><note>Subject matters of<lb/>property 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> class<lb/>Obligatory services<lb/>Class 1. Obligatory service<lb/>pecuniary</note></p> <p>1. <add>First</add> Class of <del><gap/></del> obligatory services.  Pecuniary or say<lb/>Money services &#x2014; services consisting in the payment of money<lb/><del>as to</del> <add>which may be</add> an amount liquidated or unliquidated.</p> <p><note>No individual article<lb/>the subject matter of<lb/>this right</note></p> <p>To this head may be no other head can the subject<lb/>matter of <add>the</add> right in question be referred to with propriety<lb/>be said to belong.  Why?  Answer.  Because no individual<lb/>article belonging either to the class of immoveable or to the<lb/>class of <sic>moveables</sic> is ever the subject matter of it: the service<lb/>is rendered the correspondent obligation is fulfilled<lb/>by the delivery of any individual piece of money whatsoever<lb/>at the option of the <del><gap/></del> <sic>obligee,</sic> provided the value<lb/>of them is that which is the subject matter of the right.</p> <p><note>If <add>an</add> individual piece <del>or<lb/>pieces</del> of money the<lb/>subject matter <del>th</del> of the<lb/>right it becomes an<lb/>article of <sic>moveables</sic><lb/>and the service no<lb/>longer a mere pecuniary<lb/>service</note></p> <p>What may happen is that an individual piece<lb/>of money or <del>any on</del> individual pieces of money in any<lb/>greater number are the subject matters to which the demandant<lb/>lays claim: as for example pieces to which<lb/>their <del>being piece of foreign</del> <add>having been</add> manufactured <del>in</del> <add>under</add> some foreign<lb/>government or under the government of the state in question<lb/>has given to them in the eyes of the public <del>at large</del> <add>in general</add><lb/>or in the eyes of the demandant in particular, an extra<lb/>value.  In this case the right has <add>indeed</add> for its subject matter<lb/>a certain article or set of articles belonging to the class of<lb/><sic>moveables:</sic> for <del>the</del> by pieces other than the individual<lb/>piece in question the obligation can not be fulfilled.<lb/>But by the description thus given of it this second case is<lb/><sic>shewn</sic> to be a different one from the first <add>that in question</add>.</p> <p>&#9758; After of before <sic>shewing</sic> the difference between the case of <unclear>sums</unclear> liquidated<lb/>and <unclear>sums</unclear> not liquidated proceed to state the several efficient causes<lb/>of right and assertion of right: observing how much more numerous they are<lb/><add>in</add><lb/> <!-- continues in the margin --> in the case of this specie of<lb/>subject matter than any<lb/>other.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:56, 19 February 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 Oct. 8
Blackstone or Civil Code

Subject matter
III. Services.
1 Money. Service

III. Third class of subject matters of property right — Services
obligatory services

Subject matters of
property 3d class
Obligatory services
Class 1. Obligatory service
pecuniary

1. First Class of obligatory services. Pecuniary or say
Money services — services consisting in the payment of money
as to which may be an amount liquidated or unliquidated.

No individual article
the subject matter of
this right

To this head may be no other head can the subject
matter of the right in question be referred to with propriety
be said to belong. Why? Answer. Because no individual
article belonging either to the class of immoveable or to the
class of moveables is ever the subject matter of it: the service
is rendered the correspondent obligation is fulfilled
by the delivery of any individual piece of money whatsoever
at the option of the obligee, provided the value
of them is that which is the subject matter of the right.

If an individual piece or
pieces
of money the
subject matter th of the
right it becomes an
article of moveables
and the service no
longer a mere pecuniary
service

What may happen is that an individual piece
of money or any on individual pieces of money in any
greater number are the subject matters to which the demandant
lays claim: as for example pieces to which
their being piece of foreign having been manufactured in under some foreign
government or under the government of the state in question
has given to them in the eyes of the public at large in general
or in the eyes of the demandant in particular, an extra
value. In this case the right has indeed for its subject matter
a certain article or set of articles belonging to the class of
moveables: for the by pieces other than the individual
piece in question the obligation can not be fulfilled.
But by the description thus given of it this second case is
shewn to be a different one from the first that in question.

☞ After of before shewing the difference between the case of sums liquidated
and sums not liquidated proceed to state the several efficient causes
of right and assertion of right: observing how much more numerous they are
in
in the case of this specie of
subject matter than any
other.



Identifier: | JB/031/053/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-10-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

053

Info in main headings field

blackstone or civil code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9739

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in