JB/031/065/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/031/065/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1828 <sic>Sept.</sic> 18.<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>&sect;2. Universal<lb/>Jurisprudence</note><lb/>(1) <note>Conclusion.<lb/><gap/> alone <gap/><lb/> <del>Of</del> <add>In</add> jurisprudence, nothing<lb/>universal but the language.</note></p> <p><note>Per reader, expected to find<lb/>laws and not words mainly.</note></p> <p>Good, (say you) <add>(we hear you saying)</add> impertinent indeed <del>are these</del><lb/>is the import of these words &#x2014; we do not deny it &#x2014; and<lb/>Assuredly not a language <del>is</del> <add>can</add> there be any where in<lb/>which we should not expect <add>along with you</add> to find the equivalent<lb/>of it.  But still these are but words: and when we<lb/>were told of <gap/> what we expected to find <add>was assured to us</add><lb/>was laws: and where Universal Jurisprudence Universal<lb/>laws: laws which are established and <gap/><lb/>as <gap/> every where.</p> <p><note>Author.  We must refer you<lb/>for this to another Shop,<lb/>where they do not furnish<lb/>what you have just seen,<lb/>what they do is last known<lb/>to Professors.</note></p> <!-- brackets in pencil --> [Authors.]  Gentle readers if nothing will serve<lb/>you but Universal Laws [it is we <add>to supply you is we</add> confess more than we<lb/>can do to supply you.]  <!-- deletion in pencil --><del>Those all</del> <add>Our shop contains</add> No such ware are<lb/>to be had <add>not any such ware</add> at our shop.  All we can do for you, is<lb/>to refer you to another <add>some other</add> shop, where they profess to<lb/>sell <del>the <gap/> and</del> you something under this name.<lb/>What <del>they do not supply</del> is not to be had at these<lb/>shops is what you have just been seeing: what<lb/>is to be had there is best known to the Shop keepers<lb/>I mean the Professors of this same Jurisprudence, <hi rend="underline">alias</hi><lb/>Universal Jurisprudence.</p> <p><note>Legal arrangements <add>transport</add> for<lb/>Security be every where &#x2014; <lb/>but nothing universal except<lb/>the language</note></p> <p>Not but in every state, society is some<lb/>how or other kept together, and it is by <del.<gap/></del> legal arrangements &#x2014;<lb/>obligatory arrangements of some sort or other<lb/>that the effect is produced: <del>under the <gap/></del> <add>security for person in</add> property<lb/>in some sort and degree established &#x2014; under the name of<lb/>offences and criminal acts by which that security is or<lb/>is supposed to be <gap/>, <add>in some way or other</add> <gap/> and thus in some<lb/>degree or other repressed.  But all this is bit so much<lb/><talk about law, and foremost as <del>this is not</del> <add>therefore</add> the talk is<lb/>not about what Law ought to be, &#x2014; where is the great<lb/>use of it? One <gap/> ask the learned Gentlemen &#x2014; the Doctors<lb/><and other Professors.  As to a law which in the terms of it has<lb/><add>place</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> place in every nature<lb/>or even in <del>any</del> every<lb/><gap/> nature &#x2014; no<lb/>such law <gap/> they <add>you</add> be<lb/>able to give you <add>be able to get from them</add> no such<lb/>law would they be able<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> to find.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p>In conclusion &#x2014; the result is &#x2014; that in Jurisprudence nothing is there then <gap/> can with truth be called <add>styled</add> <hi rend="underline">Universal</hi>, but the language.</p>
<head>1828 <sic>Sept.</sic> 18.<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>&sect;2. Universal<lb/>Jurisprudence</note><lb/>(1) <note>Conclusion.<lb/>Language alone universal<lb/> <del>Of</del> <add>In</add> jurisprudence, nothing<lb/>universal but the language.</note></p> <p><note>Per reader, expected to find<lb/>laws and not words mainly.</note></p> <p>Good, (say you) <add>(we hear you saying)</add> important indeed <del>are these</del><lb/>is the import of these words &#x2014; we do not deny it &#x2014; and<lb/>assuredly not a language <del>is</del> <add>can</add> there be any where in<lb/>which we should not expect <add>along with you</add> to find the equivalent<lb/>of it.  But still these are but words: and when we<lb/>were told of Jurisprudence what we expected <add>was assured to us</add> to find<lb/>was laws: and where Universal Jurisprudence Universal<lb/>laws: laws which are established and held<lb/>as binding every where.</p> <p><note>Author.  We must refer you<lb/>for this to another Shop,<lb/>where they do not furnish<lb/>what you have just seen,<lb/>what they do is best known<lb/>to Professors.</note></p> <!-- brackets in pencil --> <p>[Authors.]  Gentle readers if nothing will serve<lb/>you but Universal Laws [it is we <add>to supply you is we</add> confess more than we<lb/>can do to supply you.]  <!-- deletion in pencil --><del>Those all</del> <add>Our shop contains</add> No such ware are<lb/>to be had <add>not any such ware</add> at our shop.  All we can do for you, is<lb/>to refer you to another <add>some other</add> shop, where they profess to<lb/>sell <del>the articles and</del> you something under this name.<lb/>What <del>they do not supply</del> is not to be had at these<lb/>shops is what you have just been seeing: what<lb/>is to be had there is best known to the Shop keepers<lb/>I mean the Professors of this same Jurisprudence, <hi rend="underline">alias</hi><lb/>Universal Jurisprudence.</p> <p><note>Legal arrangements <add>transport</add> for<lb/>Security be every where &#x2014; <lb/>but nothing universal except<lb/>the language</note></p> <p>Not but in every state, society is some<lb/>how or other kept together, and it is by <del><gap/></del> legal arrangements &#x2014;<lb/>obligatory arrangements of some sort or other<lb/>that the effect is produced: <del>under the name</del> <add>security for person or</add> property<lb/>in some sort and degree established &#x2014; under the name of<lb/>offences and criminal acts by which that security is or<lb/>is supposed to be <unclear>dispatched</unclear>, <add>in some way or other</add> punished and thus in some<lb/>degree or other repressed.  But all this is bit so much<lb/>talk about law, and foremost as <del>this is not</del> <add>therefore</add> the talk is<lb/>not about what Law ought to be, &#x2014; where is the great<lb/>use of it? Once more ask the learned Gentlemen &#x2014; the Doctors<lb/>and other Professors.  As to a law which in the terms of it has<lb/><add>place</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> place in every nation<lb/>or even in <del>any</del> every<lb/>civilized nation &#x2014; no<lb/>such law <unclear>could</unclear> they <add>you</add> be<lb/>able to give you <add>be able to get from them</add> no such<lb/>law would they be able<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> to find.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p>In conclusion &#x2014; the result is &#x2014; that in Jurisprudence nothing is there then that can with truth be called <add>styled</add> <hi rend="underline">Universal</hi>, but the language.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:31, 5 March 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 Sept. 18.
Blackstone

§2. Universal
Jurisprudence

(1) Conclusion.
Language alone universal
Of In jurisprudence, nothing
universal but the language.

Per reader, expected to find
laws and not words mainly.

Good, (say you) (we hear you saying) important indeed are these
is the import of these words — we do not deny it — and
assuredly not a language is can there be any where in
which we should not expect along with you to find the equivalent
of it. But still these are but words: and when we
were told of Jurisprudence what we expected was assured to us to find
was laws: and where Universal Jurisprudence Universal
laws: laws which are established and held
as binding every where.

Author. We must refer you
for this to another Shop,
where they do not furnish
what you have just seen,
what they do is best known
to Professors.

[Authors.] Gentle readers if nothing will serve
you but Universal Laws [it is we to supply you is we confess more than we
can do to supply you.] Those all Our shop contains No such ware are
to be had not any such ware at our shop. All we can do for you, is
to refer you to another some other shop, where they profess to
sell the articles and you something under this name.
What they do not supply is not to be had at these
shops is what you have just been seeing: what
is to be had there is best known to the Shop keepers
I mean the Professors of this same Jurisprudence, alias
Universal Jurisprudence.

Legal arrangements transport for
Security be every where —
but nothing universal except
the language

Not but in every state, society is some
how or other kept together, and it is by legal arrangements —
obligatory arrangements of some sort or other
that the effect is produced: under the name security for person or property
in some sort and degree established — under the name of
offences and criminal acts by which that security is or
is supposed to be dispatched, in some way or other punished and thus in some
degree or other repressed. But all this is bit so much
talk about law, and foremost as this is not therefore the talk is
not about what Law ought to be, — where is the great
use of it? Once more ask the learned Gentlemen — the Doctors
and other Professors. As to a law which in the terms of it has
place
place in every nation
or even in any every
civilized nation — no
such law could they you be
able to give you be able to get from them no such
law would they be able
to find.

In conclusion — the result is — that in Jurisprudence nothing is there then that can with truth be called styled Universal, but the language.



Identifier: | JB/031/065/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-09-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

065

Info in main headings field

blackstone

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

9751

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in