JB/011/302/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/302/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/011/302/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
this last case the <del>logical</del> <add>metaphysical</add> field of jurisdiction would not by<lb/>
this last case the <del>logical</del> <add>metaphysical</add> field of jurisdiction would not by<lb/>
a great deal so extensive as that of a County Magistrate:<lb/>
a great deal so extensive as that of a County Magistrate:<lb/>
<del>as that with submission which considered the county</del> <add>notwithstanding which <del>tha</del> Judge being a higher </add>
<del>as that with submission which considered the county</del> <add>notwithstanding which <del>tha</del> Judge being a higher <gap/></add><lb/>
</p>
title than Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (Witness the Welsh Judges,<lb/>
 
the <add>Public</add> may well consider itself as having made an escape, if<lb/>
 
by the <del>Right Hon</del> light of the above precedent, the Right Honorable<lb/>
Secretary does not discover that no Gentlemen well acquainted<lb/>
with the law will be found to undertake that Office for less than<lb/>
a thousand a year.</p>
<p>(3)<lb/>
But, <del>assuming</del> if it may be assumed<lb/>
that in this respect a Judge with a larger field of jurisdiction<lb/>
<del>logical</del> <add>metaphysical</add> as well as geographical, than that of an <del><gap/></del> English<lb/>
Justice of the Peace is not <del>below the</del> in respect of need of<lb/>
<del>appropriate <gap/></del> <add>general</add> "acquaintance" with the law below the level of<lb/>
an English Justice of the Peace, the Right Honorable patron<lb/>
of <add>learning and</add> learned Gentlemen <del>in both <add>so <gap/></add> capacities does himself injustice<lb/>
by the assumption of their <gap/> has displayed <add>his</add> or will be<lb/>
seen</del> <add>has</add> displayed more modesty than correctness in and by<lb/>
his <del>assumption does</del> <add>thing <del><gap/></del> assumed <del>of the <gap/></del></add> official ignorance.</p>
<p>Before me lies<lb/>
the House of Commons paper intituled "Estimates &amp;c for<lb/>
"Miscellaneous Services for the Year 1828.  N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 122, Date<lb/>
of Order for printing 12 March 1828.  In page 2 <gap/><lb/>
N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1 "Estimate of the charge of defraying the Civil Establishment<lb/>
"of the Bahama Islands I read these words <del>that is to<lb/>
say</del> Chief Justice £500:  Two Assistant Judges at £200<lb/>
<del>each</del> per annum each, £400.</p>
<p>Offices, <add>of</add> which on this occasion M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel was taking<lb/>
a view, three:  <add>of</add> that of the English sort of Judge stiled <hi rend="underline">Police<lb/>
Magistrate</hi>, a direct view;  of that of the French sort of Judge<lb/>
stiled Juge de Paix, also a direct view;  of the <add>English</add> lately proposed<lb/>
and still contemplated sort of Judge stiled a County<lb/>
Court Judge, an indirect view.</p>
<p>(2)<lb/>
In no small degree <del>are<lb/>
<gap/></del> <add><del>every <gap/></del> are</add> assent &amp; dissent<lb/>
dependent <del>on</del> <add>upon</add> names.  No<lb/>
<del><add>it is not in the nature of thing</add> that this dependence <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
secret</del> <add>secret is this dependence</add>
to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel.<lb/>
<del>A</del> Judge is a higher<lb/>
name than Magistrate<lb/>
or Justice of Peace:  and<lb/>
whatsoever be the remuneration<lb/>
<del>given to a Magistrate</del> <add>attached to the inferior</add><lb/>
<del>the man <add>functionary</add> in the higher</del><lb/>
name, that you and<lb/>
<gap/> also, <del>ought to be</del> <add>a M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel</add><lb/>
<del>given to the functionary <add>attached to the superior</add><lb/>
will name.  Now then</del> <add>can scarce lose the opportunity<lb/>
of saying, ought to be attached</add><lb/>
to the superior name.<lb/>
This being understood,<lb/>
if "no <del>Gentlem</del> number<lb/>
"of gentlemen well acquainted<lb/>
"with the law<lb/>
"can be found to <del>take the</del><lb/>
"undertake the office" will<lb/>
"the inferior name for less<lb/>
than £800, <del><gap/></del> <add>can</add> it be<lb/>
assumed that any sufficient<lb/>
number of <add>such</add> Gentlemen<lb/>
would be willing to undertake<lb/>
it <del>for less</del> to set it<lb/>
at the lowest rate for less<lb/>
than £1,000 a year?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:10, 8 April 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 March 23
J.B. to Herald on Peel and Bentham

Such an Office? what Office. The particular that of Salaried Police Magistrates as proposed throughout
for the Unpaid ones, but including in principle that of an
that of Judge of the proposed County Courts: whose for
this last case the logical metaphysical field of jurisdiction would not by
a great deal so extensive as that of a County Magistrate:
as that with submission which considered the county notwithstanding which tha Judge being a higher
title than Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (Witness the Welsh Judges,
the Public may well consider itself as having made an escape, if
by the Right Hon light of the above precedent, the Right Honorable
Secretary does not discover that no Gentlemen well acquainted
with the law will be found to undertake that Office for less than
a thousand a year.

(3)
But, assuming if it may be assumed
that in this respect a Judge with a larger field of jurisdiction
logical metaphysical as well as geographical, than that of an English
Justice of the Peace is not below the in respect of need of
appropriate general "acquaintance" with the law below the level of
an English Justice of the Peace, the Right Honorable patron
of learning and learned Gentlemen in both so capacities does himself injustice
by the assumption of their has displayed his or will be
seen
has displayed more modesty than correctness in and by
his assumption does thing assumed of the official ignorance.

Before me lies
the House of Commons paper intituled "Estimates &c for
"Miscellaneous Services for the Year 1828. No 122, Date
of Order for printing 12 March 1828. In page 2
No 1 "Estimate of the charge of defraying the Civil Establishment
"of the Bahama Islands I read these words that is to
say
Chief Justice £500: Two Assistant Judges at £200
each per annum each, £400.

Offices, of which on this occasion Mr Peel was taking
a view, three: of that of the English sort of Judge stiled Police
Magistrate
, a direct view; of that of the French sort of Judge
stiled Juge de Paix, also a direct view; of the English lately proposed
and still contemplated sort of Judge stiled a County
Court Judge, an indirect view.

(2)
In no small degree are
every are assent & dissent
dependent on upon names. No
it is not in the nature of thing that this dependence
secret
secret is this dependence to Mr Peel.
A Judge is a higher
name than Magistrate
or Justice of Peace: and
whatsoever be the remuneration
given to a Magistrate attached to the inferior
the man functionary in the higher
name, that you and
also, ought to be a Mr Peel
given to the functionary attached to the superior
will name. Now then
can scarce lose the opportunity
of saying, ought to be attached

to the superior name.
This being understood,
if "no Gentlem number
"of gentlemen well acquainted
"with the law
"can be found to take the
"undertake the office" will
"the inferior name for less
than £800, can it be
assumed that any sufficient
number of such Gentlemen
would be willing to undertake
it for less to set it
at the lowest rate for less
than £1,000 a year?


Identifier: | JB/011/302/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1828-03-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

302

Info in main headings field

jb to herald on peel and bentham

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e10 / f7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3999

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in