JB/034/194/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/194/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<lb/>
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r<hi rend="underline">..</hi></hi> 19</p>
<p>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 19</p>


<head>Constitutional Code.</head> <add>or Procedure</add> <del>1. Enactive Part</del><add>Ratiocinate</add><lb/>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> <add>or Procedure</add> <del>1. Enactive Part</del><add>Ratiocinate</add><lb/>
Line 17: Line 17:
from a Quasi Jury?</p>
from a Quasi Jury?</p>


<p>To <del>these two</del> questions this <gap/> connected, in <del><gap/></del> <lb/>
<p>To <del>these two</del> questions thus <gap/> connected, in <del><gap/></del> <lb/>
separate answer can <gap/> to give.</p>
separate answer can <unclear>conveniently</unclear> be given.</p>
<p>Reasons</p>
<p>Reasons</p>
<p>1. Appeal is eventually allowed, best if to a single Judge without<lb/>
<p>1. Appeal is eventually allowed, best if to a single Judge without<lb/>
any presumptively <unclear>contracting</unclear> Jury the piece of aflicting punishment to such a extent <gap/> price, the security against <unclear>endeavour</unclear><lb/>
any presumptively <unclear>contracting</unclear> Jury the piece of aflicting punishment <lb/>
to such a extent <gap/> price, the security against <unclear>endeavour</unclear><lb/>
and <del><gap/></del> oppression should <gap/> be regarded as not<add>insufficient</add> sufficiently<lb/>
and <del><gap/></del> oppression should <gap/> be regarded as not<add>insufficient</add> sufficiently<lb/>
strong.</p>
strong.</p>


<p>2. The faculty of giving effect to the <gap/>ptent <del>or <gap/></del><lb/>
<p>2. The faculty of giving effect to the <unclear>Appeal</unclear> <del>or <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>to the d<gap/></del> inclined  of being left as in the cases without<add>unrespected</add><lb/>
<del>to the d<gap/></del> inclined  of being left as in the cases without<add>unrespected</add><lb/>
restraint in the hands of the individual is lodged in the hands<lb/>
restraint in the hands of the individual is lodged in the hands<lb/>
of the <del><gap/></del> Quasi Jury because if lodged in the hands of the<lb/>
of the <del><gap/></del> Quasi Jury because if lodged in the hands of the<lb/>
individual delay visitor and <del><gap/></del> pecuniary expence, in<lb/>
individual <unclear>delay visitor</unclear> and <del><gap/></del> pecuniary expence, in<lb/>
increases quantity would be the same result: <gap/> to<lb/>
increases quantity would be the same result: <gap/> to<lb/>
a great extent, namely <add><del>by</del> by means of di<gap/></add>  in arms where the <gap/> of <gap/><gap/> <gap/><lb/>
a great extent, namely <add><del>by</del> by means of <unclear>disolution</unclear></add>  in cases where the expence of <gap/> <gap/>ant<lb/>
fell upon individuals cases in which cream of the class are prosecuted<lb/>
fell upon individuals <del>by</del> also to cases indist<gap/> amount.<lb/>
Of the individual cases in which crimes of this class are prosecuted<lb/>
for scarcely in a<gap/> out of a hundred is the defendant<lb/>
for scarcely in a<gap/> out of a hundred is the defendant<lb/>
to form altogether <gap/>: in the other 99 his is <add>really</add>guilty<lb/>
a person altogether innocent: in the other 99 his is <add>really</add>guilty<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> however in a certain proportion of them by a man
<del><gap/></del> however in a certain proportion of them by <unclear>one means</unclear><lb/>
under hr makes his escape from cuv&#x2014;.</p>
or other he makes his escape from <unclear>conviction</unclear>.</p>
 
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:31, 8 April 2024


Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr 19

Constitutional Code. or Procedure 1. Enactive PartRatiocinate

Ch. Quasi-Jury
1. App function
§.

III. Rationale. Quasi-jury part.

Question Why are the cases of Judicial-rapacity officers admitt
of Appeal?

Question Why not admitt of Appeal without a warrant
from a Quasi Jury?

To these two questions thus connected, in
separate answer can conveniently be given.

Reasons

1. Appeal is eventually allowed, best if to a single Judge without
any presumptively contracting Jury the piece of aflicting punishment
to such a extent price, the security against endeavour
and oppression should be regarded as notinsufficient sufficiently
strong.

2. The faculty of giving effect to the Appeal or
to the d inclined of being left as in the cases withoutunrespected
restraint in the hands of the individual is lodged in the hands
of the Quasi Jury because if lodged in the hands of the
individual delay visitor and pecuniary expence, in
increases quantity would be the same result: to
a great extent, namely by by means of disolution in cases where the expence of ant
fell upon individuals by also to cases indist amount.
Of the individual cases in which crimes of this class are prosecuted
for scarcely in a out of a hundred is the defendant
a person altogether innocent: in the other 99 his is reallyguilty
however in a certain proportion of them by one means
or other he makes his escape from conviction.



Identifier: | JB/034/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-10-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

194

Info in main headings field

constitutional code procedures ratiocinative part

Image

001

Titles

rationale - quasi jury part

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10468

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in