JB/034/196/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/196/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>1823. Octr.<hi rend="superscript"></hi>19</p>
<p>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi>19</p>
<head>Constitutional Code. 2. Enactive Part</head>
<head>Constitutional Code. 2. Enactive Part</head>
<note>Ch. Quasi Jury<lb/>
<note>Ch. Quasi Jury<lb/>
Line 10: Line 10:
<p>
<p>
In English bred law <del>as <gap/></del> in these cases no Appeal<lb/>
In English bred law <del>as <gap/></del> in these cases no Appeal<lb/>
in any terms<add>condition<add><gap/></add></add> has place: whatever scarcely it would afford<lb/>
in any terms<add>condition court</add> has place: whatever <unclear>security</unclear> it would <unclear>afford</unclear><lb/>
against misd<gap/> by punishment of the criminal is therefore<lb/>
against <unclear>misdemeanour</unclear> by punishment of the criminal is therefore<lb/>
<add>under that system</add> in this case wanting.  On the other hand to the purpose of<lb/>
<add>under that system</add> in this case wanting.  On the other hand to the purpose of<lb/>
ca<gap/> and thence imbrev<gap/> of punishment the time of<lb/>
<unclear>correction</unclear> and thence imbrev<gap/> of punishment the time of<lb/>
the Jury is altogether <gap/>. One <add>good</add> consequence is that<lb/>
the Jury is altogether <gap/>. One <add>good</add> consequence is that<lb/>
<del>for</del> <gap/> punishment an individual is extremely <unclear>rare</unclear>:<lb/>
<del>for</del> corrective punishment an individual is extremely <unclear>rare</unclear>:<lb/>
but a bad consequence is that<add>in an enormous pa<gap/></add> a <gap/> of individuals <gap/><lb/>
but a bad consequence is that<add>in an enormous proportion</add> a <gap/> of individuals <gap/><lb/>
greatly has place.</p>
greatly has place.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:32, 8 April 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr.19

Constitutional Code. 2. Enactive Part Ch. Quasi Jury
§ of service
1. Appeal -warranty function

In English bred law as in these cases no Appeal
in any termscondition court has place: whatever security it would afford
against misdemeanour by punishment of the criminal is therefore
under that system in this case wanting. On the other hand to the purpose of
correction and thence imbrev of punishment the time of
the Jury is altogether . One good consequence is that
for corrective punishment an individual is extremely rare:
but a bad consequence is thatin an enormous proportion a of individuals
greatly has place.



Identifier: | JB/034/196/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-10-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

196

Info in main headings field

constitutional code enactive part

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10470

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in