JB/547/140/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/140/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/140/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/140/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1810</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><gap/> <unclear>Misdecision</unclear> as ever <add>is</add> evil opposite to every an <gap/> ends<lb/>
 
of justice.  <gap/> Equals no object to add the natural mode;<lb/>
 
<gap/> the addition adds to lawyers profit.</p>
 
<p>The several possible ways of receiving and collecting<lb/>
<gap/> evidence may be all reduced <add>referred</add> <del><gap/></del> to one or other<lb/>
<gap/> <add><gap/></add> principal modes, viz.<lb/>
<gap/> natural <add>and <del><gap/></del> colloquial</add> mode, in which the person under examination<lb/>
whether <del>per</del> <add>extraneous</add> witness or party is <del><gap/></del> heard or<lb/>
<gap/> on his own side and cross examined in the<lb/>
<unclear>other</unclear> side, the Judge also putting occasionally such questions<lb/>
as he thinks fit.</p>
<p><del><gap/> natural <gap/> mode</del> There is the mode pursued in Jury trial, in causes<lb/>
<gap/> commonly by a Justice of the Peace in examination<lb/>
<gap/> either House of Parliament, and in general <del>where</del> <add>in all</add><lb/>
<gap/> in which truth and justice have <add>are</add> really the objects<lb/>
<unclear>aimed</unclear> at.  <del>Questions arising out of answers</del> <add>Succeeding questions are grounded deduced within</add><lb/>
<gap/> from the answers extracted by preceding ones.</p>
<p>The evidence <add>thus received and</add> collected by or in presence of the <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> Judges by whom the decision grounded on it is to be framed.</p>
<p><add>The natural epistolary mode</add> The Roman <add>secret</add> mode, by Judges <del>one or more</del> <add>divers receiving and extracting</add> <unclear>nominal</unclear><lb/>
one or more on each side direction none but<lb/>
<gap/> are <gap/> in a string of interrogations <gap/><lb/>
by some person <add>in whose situation</add> to whom <add>is is not possible</add> any such foresight in<lb/>
<gap/> the answers that will be returned <gap/>to them is not<lb/>
<gap/>.</p>
<p>The Roman secret mode by a single receiving<lb/>
<gap/> extracting Judge</p>
<p><gap/> The mode by affidavit <gap/> on both sides:  not a<lb/>
<add><gap/> as</add> <gap/> put <del>by any body</del> on either side or by any<lb/>
<gap/>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:51, 19 April 2024

Click Here To Edit

1810

Misdecision as ever is evil opposite to every an ends
of justice. Equals no object to add the natural mode;
the addition adds to lawyers profit.

The several possible ways of receiving and collecting
evidence may be all reduced referred to one or other
principal modes, viz.
natural and colloquial mode, in which the person under examination
whether per extraneous witness or party is heard or
on his own side and cross examined in the
other side, the Judge also putting occasionally such questions
as he thinks fit.

natural mode There is the mode pursued in Jury trial, in causes
commonly by a Justice of the Peace in examination
either House of Parliament, and in general where in all
in which truth and justice have are really the objects
aimed at. Questions arising out of answers Succeeding questions are grounded deduced within
from the answers extracted by preceding ones.

The evidence thus received and collected by or in presence of the
Judges by whom the decision grounded on it is to be framed.

The natural epistolary mode The Roman secret mode, by Judges one or more divers receiving and extracting nominal
one or more on each side direction none but
are in a string of interrogations
by some person in whose situation to whom is is not possible any such foresight in
the answers that will be returned to them is not
.

The Roman secret mode by a single receiving
extracting Judge

The mode by affidavit on both sides: not a
as put by any body on either side or by any
.


Identifier: | JB/547/140/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-12-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

140

Info in main headings field

Prizes

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in