JB/031/217/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/031/217/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/031/217/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1828 <sic>Nov.</sic> 18<lb/>Law and Blackstone</head> <p><unclear>all</unclear> 18<lb/>(4</p> <p>(2)<lb/>A <gap/> for it Students sake Mr Black is not here <del><gap/></del> is <gap/><lb/>will be Moral Chaos <gap/>  It can not be better <gap/>.  He needs little is<lb?>any <gap/> from use that we can give that is an <gap/> in <gap/></p> <p><note>7<lb/>Immediate subordinate<lb/>ends of Government<lb/>four subsistence<lb/>Abundance, Security<lb/>and Equality</note></p> <p>Astraia in continuity.  Tell me more of Law as<lb/>it ought to be what are the commendably subordinate ends<lb/>II. <del>Secondary, no protection</del> <add><gap/> part considered</add> specific <del>and <gap/> <gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">ends of government</hi><lb/>Felicia.  Madam they are capable of standing expressed <add>being indicated</add> in<lb/>these four words.  <del><gap/></del> Subsistence, Abundance, &#x2014; Security<lb/>Equality</p> <p>&#9758; Proceed with the explanation of these from the "Lady Principles"<lb/>in print.</p> <!-- line in pencil across the page --> <p>(1)<lb/>Dolosa.  As to the distinction between what ought to be<lb/>and what in England the law is, it is no better than a<lb/>fanciful one: mere theory nothing better, neither <gap/><lb/>nor Puttendorf know of any such distinction <del>Why</del> <add>Take</add> any<lb/>arrangement which ought to be established: a necessary and<lb?>more failing consequence is &#x2014; that unless that law which is<lb/>the perfection of reason it is established and <add>as such</add> ought to be deemed<lb/>and taken to be.  So, again, <add>conversely</add> if <del>by <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>on</add> it is established<Lb/>it follows by purity of reason that it is exactly that which<lb/>ought to be established.  As the <del.<gap/></del> potter and the statuary<lb/>mould their clay, learned Judges mould the<lb/>law: which law is accordingly on every occasion at<lb/>one what <del><gap/> <gap/> it is and what it ought to be.  Lord<lb/>Mansfield <del><gap/> <gap/></del> on occasion <add>speaking from the Bench</add>  declared it to be his<lb/>practice to <gap/> the law <hi rend="underline">mould</hi> was his very word.</p> <p>the law if <add>ought be</add> so and so there so it is: the law id so<lb/>and so, therefore it ought to be.  Such is one <gap/><lb/>This being admitted it follows that when applied to<lb/>the law of England the <hi rend="underline">is</hi> and the <hi rend="underline">ought to be</hi> are inter-convertible<lb/><gap/>.  Understand this more particularly of the<lb/>Common Law which throughout and from beginning to end<lb/>is in a more immediate way the work of out hands.  To<lb/>be sure there is the Statute law likewise.  But on each occasion<lb/>this is exactly whatever we <gap/> to make it, whatever be the <add>part</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> part in question we take<lb/>it in hand and mould<lb/>it into proper form, as if<lb/>it were so much common<lb/>law.  <del>Lord Man</del> Equity<lb/>is but an improved modification<lb?><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> of the Common Law, Lord Eldon when he was Chancellor was seen practicing this <gap/> art from the Chancery bench for the instrument of the learned <gap/><lb/>the speculative &#9758; See <gap/></p>
<head>1828 <sic>Nov.</sic> 18<lb/>Law and Blackstone</head> <p><unclear>all</unclear> 18<lb/>(4</p> <p>(2)<lb/>A view for the Students sake <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Black is not here <del><gap/></del> is <gap/><lb/>will be <unclear>Moral Chaos</unclear> <gap/>  It can not be better occupied.  He needs little if<lb/>any exemption from use that we can give that is an undertaking we give</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Immediate subordinate<lb/>ends of Government<lb/>four Subsistence<lb/>Abundance, Security<lb/>and Equality</note></p> <p>Astraia in continuity.  Tell me more of Law as<lb/>it ought to be what are the immediately subordinate ends<lb/>II. <del>Secondary, no protection</del> <add>Next paid consideration</add> Specific <del>and <gap/> <gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">ends of government</hi></p> <p>Felicia.  Madam they are capable of standing expressed <add>being indicated</add> in<lb/>these four words.  <del><gap/></del> Subsistence, Abundance, &#x2014; Security<lb/>Equality</p> <p>&#9758; Proceed with the explanation of these from the "Lady Principles"<lb/>in print.</p> <!-- line in pencil across the page --> <p><note><del><gap/><lb/><gap/></del></note></p> <p>(1)<lb/>Dolosa.  As to the distinction between what ought to be<lb/>and what in England the law is, it is no better than a<lb/>fanciful one: mere theory nothing better, neither <unclear>Gretises</unclear><lb/>nor Puftendorf know of any such distinction <del>Why</del> <add>Take</add> any<lb/>arrangement which ought to be established: a necessary and<lb/>never failing consequence is &#x2014; that unless that law which is<lb/>the perfection of reason it is established and <add>as such</add> ought to be deemed<lb/>and taken to be.  So, again, <add>conversely</add> if <del>by the <gap/></del> <add>once</add> it is established<lb/>it follows by purity of reason that it is exactly that which<lb/>ought to be established.  As the <del><gap/></del> potter and the statuary<lb/>mould their clay, learned Judges mould the<lb/>law: which law is accordingly on every occasion at<lb/>once what <del>the La</del> it is and what it ought to be.  Lord<lb/>Mansfield <del><gap/></del> on one occasion <add>speaking from the Bench</add>  declared it to be his<lb/>practice to mould the law <hi rend="underline">mould</hi> was his very word.</p> <p>The law is <add>ought to</add> so and so, therefore so it is: the law is so<lb/>and so, therefore it ought to be.  Such is one law.<lb/>This being admitted it follows that <del>the</del> when applied to<lb/>the law of England the <hi rend="underline">is</hi> and the <hi rend="underline">ought to be</hi> are inter-convertible<lb/>terms.  Understand this more particularly of the<lb/>Common Law which throughout and from beginning to end<lb/>is in a more immediate way the work of our hands.  To<lb/>be sure there is the Statute law likewise.  But on each occasion<lb/>this is exactly whatever we please to make it, whatever be the <add>part</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> part in question we take<lb/>it in hand and mould<lb/>it into proper form, as if<lb/>it were so much common<lb/>law.  <del>Lord Eldon</del> Equity<lb/>is but an improved modification<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> of the Common Law, Lord Eldon when he was Chancellor was seen practising this injudicious art form <add>on</add> the Chancery Bench for the instrument of the learned <add>his learned</add> among<lb/>the spectators &#9758; See Judicatories</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:14, 7 May 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 Nov. 18
Law and Blackstone

all 18
(4

(2)
A view for the Students sake Mr Black is not here is
will be Moral Chaos It can not be better occupied. He needs little if
any exemption from use that we can give that is an undertaking we give

7
Immediate subordinate
ends of Government
four Subsistence
Abundance, Security
and Equality

Astraia in continuity. Tell me more of Law as
it ought to be what are the immediately subordinate ends
II. Secondary, no protection Next paid consideration Specific and ends of government

Felicia. Madam they are capable of standing expressed being indicated in
these four words. Subsistence, Abundance, — Security
Equality

☞ Proceed with the explanation of these from the "Lady Principles"
in print.


(1)
Dolosa. As to the distinction between what ought to be
and what in England the law is, it is no better than a
fanciful one: mere theory nothing better, neither Gretises
nor Puftendorf know of any such distinction Why Take any
arrangement which ought to be established: a necessary and
never failing consequence is — that unless that law which is
the perfection of reason it is established and as such ought to be deemed
and taken to be. So, again, conversely if by the once it is established
it follows by purity of reason that it is exactly that which
ought to be established. As the potter and the statuary
mould their clay, learned Judges mould the
law: which law is accordingly on every occasion at
once what the La it is and what it ought to be. Lord
Mansfield on one occasion speaking from the Bench declared it to be his
practice to mould the law mould was his very word.

The law is ought to so and so, therefore so it is: the law is so
and so, therefore it ought to be. Such is one law.
This being admitted it follows that the when applied to
the law of England the is and the ought to be are inter-convertible
terms. Understand this more particularly of the
Common Law which throughout and from beginning to end
is in a more immediate way the work of our hands. To
be sure there is the Statute law likewise. But on each occasion
this is exactly whatever we please to make it, whatever be the part
part in question we take
it in hand and mould
it into proper form, as if
it were so much common
law. Lord Eldon Equity
is but an improved modification
of the Common Law, Lord Eldon when he was Chancellor was seen practising this injudicious art form on the Chancery Bench for the instrument of the learned his learned among
the spectators ☞ See Judicatories



Identifier: | JB/031/217/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-11-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

7

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

217

Info in main headings field

law and blackstone

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d10 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

9903

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in