JB/039/246/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/039/246/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/039/246/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/039/246/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1826 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 7 or 8<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head><note>Ch. IX. Ministers collectively<lb/>
 
&sect;. 3. Number in an Office continued.</note></p>
 
<p><del>Self-judicature is corruption <add>continualized</add> maximized.</del></p>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Ratiocinative  Expositive</hi></p>
<p>3.  <del><gap/></del> Of the union <del>of</del> made of a Judicial Office<lb/>
to an Office belonging to any other Department, the consequence<lb/>
might be an indirect and disguised system<lb/>
of self-judicature.  <del><add>for</add> an instance The Such <add>is</add> would be the<lb/>
effect as often as <add><gap/> far as</add> in virtue of his judicial office the<lb/>
functionary has <gap/> the power is <gap/> from<lb/>
effect so far as <add><gap/></add> judicial shape power is</del><lb/>
Such <del>must the effect as often</del> <add><del>could</del> can not but be the effect in so far</add> as in virtue of the judicial<lb/>
function <del><gap/></del> <unclear>judicial</unclear> power is exercised in relation<lb/>
to the conduct of the same functionary in the exercise<lb/>
of <del>the</del> <add>any</add> function belonging to another Office also held by<lb/>
him.</p>
<p>Instructional</p>
<p>Art.  Self-judicature is <del>co self</del> corruption – self-corruption<lb/>
maximized and perfected.  In <add>an open and</add> a direct<lb/>
way it is <unclear>gross</unclear> than an example of <add>the absurdity as well as immorality of</add> it is scarcely<lb/>
to be found <add><del>exempl</del> exhibited</add> in the practice of the most flagrantly inapt<lb/>
form of government.  But <del>that of</del> there are two ways<lb/>
in each of which the effect of it is producible and in<lb/>
a variety of instances may be seen actually produced.</p>
<p>1.  The one is when <del><gap/></del> of the two offices – the <del>subordinate</del> <add>subordinate</add><lb/>
and the <del><gap/></del> judicially superordinate <add>either the <del><gap/></del></add> one <del>being</del><lb/>
or the other <del>being</del> <add><del>or both</del> or both are</add> many-seated and the power of it<lb/>
thereby fractionized.</p>
<p>2.  The other is where <del>the Subordinate <gap/></del> the <del>super</del> <add>Subordinate</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> is not responsible in any way, compensationally<lb/>
punitionally or dislocationably to any authority other than<lb/>
that of the Superordinate, or to some may seated judicial<lb/>
Office of <add>in</add> which the<lb/>
superordinate <del>to</del> has<lb/>
a <del><gap/></del> seat.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:40, 12 June 2024

Click Here To Edit

1826 Jany. 7 or 8
Constitutional CodeCh. IX. Ministers collectively
§. 3. Number in an Office continued.

Self-judicature is corruption continualized maximized.

Ratiocinative Expositive

3. Of the union of made of a Judicial Office
to an Office belonging to any other Department, the consequence
might be an indirect and disguised system
of self-judicature. for an instance The Such is would be the
effect as often as far as in virtue of his judicial office the
functionary has the power is from
effect so far as judicial shape power is

Such must the effect as often could can not but be the effect in so far as in virtue of the judicial
function judicial power is exercised in relation
to the conduct of the same functionary in the exercise
of the any function belonging to another Office also held by
him.

Instructional

Art. Self-judicature is co self corruption – self-corruption
maximized and perfected. In an open and a direct
way it is gross than an example of the absurdity as well as immorality of it is scarcely
to be found exempl exhibited in the practice of the most flagrantly inapt
form of government. But that of there are two ways
in each of which the effect of it is producible and in
a variety of instances may be seen actually produced.

1. The one is when of the two offices – the subordinate subordinate
and the judicially superordinate either the one being
or the other being or both or both are many-seated and the power of it
thereby fractionized.

2. The other is where the Subordinate the super Subordinate
is not responsible in any way, compensationally
punitionally or dislocationably to any authority other than
that of the Superordinate, or to some may seated judicial
Office of in which the
superordinate to has
a seat.


Identifier: | JB/039/246/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 39.

Date_1

1826-01-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

039

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

246

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

ratiocinative expositive / instructional

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

12253

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in