★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/039/255/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/039/255/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1827 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 7<lb/> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code</head><note>Note (a)<lb/> | |||
Ch. IX. Ministers collectively<lb/> | |||
§. 2. Minister and Subdepartments<lb/> | |||
Not employed</note></p> | |||
<p>Quere whether to employ this under title <hi rend="underline">Number</hi> <unclear>4</unclear><lb/> | |||
the irresponsibility having here a different cause.</p> | |||
<p><head>Note (a)</head></p> | |||
<p>(a) This mischief is in this case aggravated, and the<lb/> | |||
system of corruption <del>and</del> despotism and misrule perfected<lb/> | |||
by another arrangement, which belongs <add>in a direct way</add> not to the<lb/> | |||
purpose of the present Section but which <add>matter of</add> by reason of the | |||
magnitude of its influence in respect of this same purpose<lb/> | |||
can not be altogether omitted. This is: that the<lb/> | |||
Judicatory in question – the only one which has cognizance<lb/> | |||
of delinquency in the abovementioned shape is a judicatory not<lb/> | |||
having any <unclear>real</unclear> – nothing but <del><gap/></del> merely apparent existence.<lb/> | |||
The <del><gap/></del> sole <unclear>authority</unclear> competent to <unclear>access</unclear> being<lb/> | |||
the House of Commons – the most influential of the two branches<lb/> | |||
of the Legislature, and the sole authority <del><gap/></del> competent to<lb/> | |||
judge being the other the consequence is that <del>in the <gap/></del> in<lb/> | |||
each instance so long as the judiciary function continues in<lb/> | |||
exercise the exercise of the legislative function is <gap/><lb/> | |||
of <unclear>this</unclear> state of things.</p> | |||
<p>One consequence is – that it would require no more than a<lb/> | |||
very small number of trials in a year or according to circumstances<lb/> | |||
no more than one such trial to absorb the whole<lb/> | |||
quantity of the time that is or can be employed in legislation<lb/> | |||
in the exercise of the legislative function. Take<lb/> | |||
for instance the two last trials that have had place for<lb/> | |||
offences of this description – <del><gap/></del> namely that of Warren<lb/> | |||
Hastings for offences in British India, and that of Lord<lb/> | |||
Viscount Melville for <del>Offences</del> corruption in the Office of Treasurer<lb/> | |||
of the Navy. <del><gap/></del> Days occupied of the time of<lb/> | |||
the House of Commons in the case of Hastings : in<lb/> | |||
the case of Lord Melville, . <add>the <gap/> necessary to</add> To fill up those<lb/> | |||
blanks would require more time than would be paid for<lb/> | |||
by the result – a circumstance <del>that</del> which does away with <add>supersedes</add> the importance<lb/> | |||
of it is – that it would depend altogether upon the colleagues and<lb/> | |||
confederates of the delinquent whether the time necessary to the purpose <add>shall</add> should be allowed.<lb/> | |||
<add>For</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1827 Jany. 7
Constitutional CodeNote (a)
Ch. IX. Ministers collectively
§. 2. Minister and Subdepartments
Not employed
Quere whether to employ this under title Number 4
the irresponsibility having here a different cause.
Note (a)
(a) This mischief is in this case aggravated, and the
system of corruption and despotism and misrule perfected
by another arrangement, which belongs in a direct way not to the
purpose of the present Section but which matter of by reason of the
magnitude of its influence in respect of this same purpose
can not be altogether omitted. This is: that the
Judicatory in question – the only one which has cognizance
of delinquency in the abovementioned shape is a judicatory not
having any real – nothing but merely apparent existence.
The sole authority competent to access being
the House of Commons – the most influential of the two branches
of the Legislature, and the sole authority competent to
judge being the other the consequence is that in the in
each instance so long as the judiciary function continues in
exercise the exercise of the legislative function is
of this state of things.
One consequence is – that it would require no more than a
very small number of trials in a year or according to circumstances
no more than one such trial to absorb the whole
quantity of the time that is or can be employed in legislation
in the exercise of the legislative function. Take
for instance the two last trials that have had place for
offences of this description – namely that of Warren
Hastings for offences in British India, and that of Lord
Viscount Melville for Offences corruption in the Office of Treasurer
of the Navy. Days occupied of the time of
the House of Commons in the case of Hastings : in
the case of Lord Melville, . the necessary to To fill up those
blanks would require more time than would be paid for
by the result – a circumstance that which does away with supersedes the importance
of it is – that it would depend altogether upon the colleagues and
confederates of the delinquent whether the time necessary to the purpose shall should be allowed.
For
Identifier: | JB/039/255/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 39. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-01-07 |
not numbered |
||
039 |
constitutional code |
||
255 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
note (a) |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 / d9 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1826 |
||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1826 |
|||
"not employed" |
12262 |
||