JB/003/163/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/163/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/163/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/163/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- Pencil --><head>Remedies or Ballance <unclear>Control</unclear>  18 Oct 1801</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1<lb/>
 
Objection – This<lb/>
 
<del>will counteract</del><lb/>
 
run counter to<lb/>
the received principles<lb/>
respecting<lb/>
the Ballance of<lb/>
Trade.  p. 1.</p>
<p>2<lb/>
Answer – This is<lb/>
the notion already<lb/>
refuted, about<lb/>
the subserviency of<lb/>
the increase of<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">money</hi> to that of<lb/>
wealth – only<lb/>
in other words.<lb/>
p. 1.</p>
<p>3<lb/>
The force of the argument<lb/>
lies in<lb/>
the weight of authority<lb/>
convey'd<lb/>
by the <hi rend="underline">language</hi> –<lb/>
and the language<lb/>
is too absurd, when<lb/>
placed in a clear<lb/>
point of view, to<lb/>
be thought capable<lb/>
of being employed,<lb/>
if governing authorities<lb/>
were not<lb/>
quoted for it.  p. 2.</p>
<p>4<lb/>
No personal imputation<lb/>
attaches<lb/>
upon any who<lb/>
employ language<lb/>
thus consecrated<lb/>
by authoritative<lb/>
and inveterate use.<lb/>
p. 3.</p>
<pb/>
<p>5.<lb/>
Favourable ballance<lb/>
of trade,<lb/>
what – an excess<lb/>
of outgoings<lb/>
above comings in<lb/>
– apparent upon<lb/>
the face of the Accounts<lb/>
– the Entries.  p. 4.</p>
<p>6<lb/>
Stiling such a<lb/>
ballance <hi rend="underline">favourable</hi>,<lb/>
is upon<lb/>
the fact of it<lb/>
contrary to universal<lb/>
usage, as<lb/>
well as common<lb/>
sense.  p. 4, 5.</p>
<p>7.<lb/>
If in this way,<lb/>
(viz: by sending out<lb/>
more than we<lb/>
have received, <hi rend="underline">we</hi><lb/>
have been carrying<lb/>
on a favourable<lb/>
– a <hi rend="underline">profitable</hi> trade,<lb/>
those we have<lb/>
been dealing<lb/>
with must for<lb/>
this century past<lb/>
have been carrying<lb/>
on an <hi rend="underline">unfavourable</hi><lb/>
– a losing one – which<lb/>
is impossible.  p. 6.</p>
<p>The words favourable<lb/>
&amp; unfavourable being<lb/>
words of <hi rend="underline">good sense</hi><lb/>
involve a proposition and that<lb/>
a false one.</p>
<pb/>
<p>8<lb/>
Foreigners, who<lb/>
according to this<lb/>
system, should<lb/>
have been carrying<lb/>
on a <hi rend="underline">losing</hi><lb/>
trade, have been<lb/>
carrying on, as<lb/>
to <hi rend="underline">rate of profit</hi><lb/>
a <hi rend="underline">more</hi> gainful<lb/>
one than ours –<lb/>
thus capital being<lb/>
less abundant.<lb/>
p. 9.</p>
<pb/>
<p>9<lb/>
The way in which<lb/>
it is made out<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> to be <hi rend="underline">favourable</hi><lb/>
is by taking for<lb/>
granted that a<lb/>
sum equal to<lb/>
the deficiency is<lb/>
received in gold<lb/>
and silver.  p. 10 11.</p>
<p>10<lb/>
In this <del><gap/></del><lb/>
case, the supposition<lb/>
is self-repugnant<lb/>
– imputing that a<lb/>
million's worth of<lb/>
gold &amp; silver is<lb/>
worth more than<lb/>
a million.  p. 12, 13, 14</p>
<p>Whatever advantages<lb/>
gold &amp;<lb/>
silver possess over<lb/>
other things, are<lb/>
allowed for in their<lb/>
prices they bear<lb/>
when exchanged<lb/>
for other things.</p>
<p>No trade without<lb/>
a gain to<lb/>
each trader on<lb/>
an average.<lb/>
Gain to each<lb/>
can not but be<lb/>
gain to all:  deducting<lb/>
the case<lb/>
where from A.'s<lb/>
gaining so much<lb/>
B.'s gain is less.</p>
<p>Reference to <del><gap/></del> <add>manufactures</add><lb/>
made as in favourable<lb/>
of <gap/><lb/>
trade so far as<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> they<lb/>
grounds<lb/>
<gap/> any</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:08, 21 June 2024

Click Here To Edit

Remedies or Ballance Control 18 Oct 1801

1
Objection – This
will counteract
run counter to
the received principles
respecting
the Ballance of
Trade. p. 1.

2
Answer – This is
the notion already
refuted, about
the subserviency of
the increase of
money to that of
wealth – only
in other words.
p. 1.

3
The force of the argument
lies in
the weight of authority
convey'd
by the language
and the language
is too absurd, when
placed in a clear
point of view, to
be thought capable
of being employed,
if governing authorities
were not
quoted for it. p. 2.

4
No personal imputation
attaches
upon any who
employ language
thus consecrated
by authoritative
and inveterate use.
p. 3.


---page break---

5.
Favourable ballance
of trade,
what – an excess
of outgoings
above comings in
– apparent upon
the face of the Accounts
– the Entries. p. 4.

6
Stiling such a
ballance favourable,
is upon
the fact of it
contrary to universal
usage, as
well as common
sense. p. 4, 5.

7.
If in this way,
(viz: by sending out
more than we
have received, we
have been carrying
on a favourable
– a profitable trade,
those we have
been dealing
with must for
this century past
have been carrying
on an unfavourable
– a losing one – which
is impossible. p. 6.

The words favourable
& unfavourable being
words of good sense
involve a proposition and that
a false one.


---page break---

8
Foreigners, who
according to this
system, should
have been carrying
on a losing
trade, have been
carrying on, as
to rate of profit
a more gainful
one than ours –
thus capital being
less abundant.
p. 9.


---page break---

9
The way in which
it is made out
to be favourable
is by taking for
granted that a
sum equal to
the deficiency is
received in gold
and silver. p. 10 11.

10
In this
case, the supposition
is self-repugnant
– imputing that a
million's worth of
gold & silver is
worth more than
a million. p. 12, 13, 14

Whatever advantages
gold &
silver possess over
other things, are
allowed for in their
prices they bear
when exchanged
for other things.

No trade without
a gain to
each trader on
an average.
Gain to each
can not but be
gain to all: deducting
the case
where from A.'s
gaining so much
B.'s gain is less.

Reference to manufactures
made as in favourable
of
trade so far as
they
grounds
any


Identifier: | JB/003/163/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-10-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

manual of political economy

Folio number

163

Info in main headings field

alarm

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

1573

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in