★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/257/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/549/257/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>GB 1928. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 10<lb/> | |||
<head>Law Amendment.</head><note>Propositions<lb/> | |||
Ch. 11. Codification.</note></p> | |||
<p><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> 116 or<lb/> | |||
<del>116</del>The above principles<lb/> | |||
the fruit and<lb/> | |||
groundwork of the here<lb/> | |||
proposed system.</p> | |||
<p>117 or<lb/> | |||
Of the existing System<lb/> | |||
correspondent principles<lb/> | |||
nonsensical.</p> | |||
<p>118 or<lb/> | |||
1. Every principle of<lb/> | |||
justice.<lb/> | |||
2. The first principles<lb/> | |||
of justice.</p> | |||
<p>⊞<lb/> | |||
119 or 26. | |||
1. Every principle of<lb/> | |||
justice – assumption<lb/> | |||
involved in it a<lb/> | |||
mere fiction.</p> | |||
<p>120 27.<lb/> | |||
2. First principles of<lb/> | |||
justice – there being<lb/> | |||
no principles, there<lb/> | |||
can be no first<lb/> | |||
principles.</p> | |||
<p>121 or 28.<lb/> | |||
Principle substitute<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">disappointment preventing<lb/> | |||
principle</hi>.</p> | |||
<p>122 29.<lb/> | |||
Intelligible, instructive<lb/> | |||
unobjectionable<lb/> | |||
is this principle.</p> | |||
<p>123 30.<lb/> | |||
No otherwise than<lb/> | |||
by this instrument<lb/> | |||
can justice be<lb/> | |||
brought under disappointment<lb/> | |||
preventing<lb/> | |||
principle.</p> | |||
<p>124 31.<lb/> | |||
Lord Mansfield a<lb/> | |||
brilliant example<lb/> | |||
of nonsensical<lb/> | |||
principles of English<lb/> | |||
system.<lb/> | |||
Outlawry of Jon E Wilkes <add>John Wilkes</add></p> | |||
<p>125 32.<lb/> | |||
Striking <gap/> of the<lb/> | |||
low condition of<lb/> | |||
moral art and science,<lb/> | |||
afforded by the<lb/> | |||
use made of these<lb/> | |||
two nonsensical<lb/> | |||
principles.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>126 33.<lb/> | |||
Vested interest & absurdity<lb/> | |||
of the locution.</p> | |||
<p>127 34.<lb/> | |||
During good behaviour<lb/> | |||
– absurdity of<lb/> | |||
the locution.</p> | |||
<p>128. or<lb/> | |||
In the here proposed<lb/> | |||
system, the fundamental<lb/> | |||
principles, corresponding<lb/> | |||
to the ends<lb/> | |||
immediately subordinate<lb/> | |||
to the all comprehensive<lb/> | |||
end, correspond<lb/> | |||
to the pathological<lb/> | |||
observations<lb/> | |||
expressed by propositions,<lb/> | |||
which, from uncontrovertibility<lb/> | |||
and applicability, are<lb/> | |||
termed <hi rend="underline">axioms</hi>.</p> | |||
<p>129. or<lb/> | |||
I. Security<lb/> | |||
Security is against<lb/> | |||
evil from whatever<lb/> | |||
sources – agency, human<lb/> | |||
and moral, or<lb/> | |||
physical. Against<lb/> | |||
evil from physical<lb/> | |||
agency, security can<lb/> | |||
not be given by law<lb/> | |||
any otherwise than<lb/> | |||
through moral: viz.<lb/> | |||
by making it the duty<lb/> | |||
of men to exclude<lb/> | |||
evil from physical<lb/> | |||
agency as far as may<lb/> | |||
be.</p> | |||
<p>130. or<lb/> | |||
I. Security.<lb/> | |||
Security – sources of<lb/> | |||
distinction –<lb/> | |||
1. Modifications of<lb/> | |||
the matter of prosperity.<lb/> | |||
2. Classes, genera and<lb/> | |||
species of offences by<lb/> | |||
which it is affected.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>131. or<lb/> | |||
IV. Equality.<lb/> | |||
Axiom as to self benefiting<lb/> | |||
powers.<lb/> | |||
1. Pleasure to superior<lb/> | |||
not so great as<lb/> | |||
pain to inferior.</p> | |||
<p>132. or<lb/> | |||
IV. Equality. Powers &c<lb/> | |||
2. Therefore, only when<lb/> | |||
converted into extra<lb/> | |||
benefiting, by appropriate<lb/> | |||
obligation,<lb/> | |||
can it be conducive<lb/> | |||
to greatest happiness.</p> | |||
<p>133. or<lb/> | |||
IV. Equality.<lb/> | |||
3. So rank and factitious<lb/> | |||
estimations<lb/> | |||
produced by ranks.</p> | |||
<p>134. or<lb/> | |||
IV. Equality.<lb/> | |||
4. So extra-reputation<lb/> | |||
or say estimation:<lb/> | |||
unless when acquired<lb/> | |||
by service rendered<lb/> | |||
to others.</p> | |||
<p>135. or 16.<lb/> | |||
Principle corresponding<lb/> | |||
to the Axioms as<lb/> | |||
to Equality the <hi rend="underline">inequality[?]-minimizing<lb/> | |||
principle</hi>.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
GB 1928. Feby. 10
Law Amendment.Propositions
Ch. 11. Codification.
⊞ 116 or
116The above principles
the fruit and
groundwork of the here
proposed system.
117 or
Of the existing System
correspondent principles
nonsensical.
118 or
1. Every principle of
justice.
2. The first principles
of justice.
⊞
119 or 26.
1. Every principle of
justice – assumption
involved in it a
mere fiction.
120 27.
2. First principles of
justice – there being
no principles, there
can be no first
principles.
121 or 28.
Principle substitute
disappointment preventing
principle.
122 29.
Intelligible, instructive
unobjectionable
is this principle.
123 30.
No otherwise than
by this instrument
can justice be
brought under disappointment
preventing
principle.
124 31.
Lord Mansfield a
brilliant example
of nonsensical
principles of English
system.
Outlawry of Jon E Wilkes John Wilkes
125 32.
Striking of the
low condition of
moral art and science,
afforded by the
use made of these
two nonsensical
principles.
---page break---
126 33.
Vested interest & absurdity
of the locution.
127 34.
During good behaviour
– absurdity of
the locution.
128. or
In the here proposed
system, the fundamental
principles, corresponding
to the ends
immediately subordinate
to the all comprehensive
end, correspond
to the pathological
observations
expressed by propositions,
which, from uncontrovertibility
and applicability, are
termed axioms.
129. or
I. Security
Security is against
evil from whatever
sources – agency, human
and moral, or
physical. Against
evil from physical
agency, security can
not be given by law
any otherwise than
through moral: viz.
by making it the duty
of men to exclude
evil from physical
agency as far as may
be.
130. or
I. Security.
Security – sources of
distinction –
1. Modifications of
the matter of prosperity.
2. Classes, genera and
species of offences by
which it is affected.
---page break---
131. or
IV. Equality.
Axiom as to self benefiting
powers.
1. Pleasure to superior
not so great as
pain to inferior.
132. or
IV. Equality. Powers &c
2. Therefore, only when
converted into extra
benefiting, by appropriate
obligation,
can it be conducive
to greatest happiness.
133. or
IV. Equality.
3. So rank and factitious
estimations
produced by ranks.
134. or
IV. Equality.
4. So extra-reputation
or say estimation:
unless when acquired
by service rendered
to others.
135. or 16.
Principle corresponding
to the Axioms as
to Equality the inequality[?]-minimizing
principle.
Identifier: | JB/549/257/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1828-02-10 |
|||
549 |
|||
257 |
Law Amendment |
||
001 |
|||
Rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
|||
John Flowerdew Colls |
|||