JB/003/377/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/377/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/377/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/377/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil --><head>Annuity Notes</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>But of the whole of the mass – be it great or<lb/>
 
small – be <add>in every part of it</add> alike susceptible (as it really <del>is</del> <add>would be</add>)<lb/>
 
of circulation, then whatever part has <add>may have</add> been employed<lb/>
 
in the purchase of an Annuity, i:e:<lb/>
of interest so long as interest was the thing<lb/>
wanted, would be susceptible of being put in<lb/>
circulation, in the <del>character</del> <add>shape</add> of <hi rend="underline">principal</hi> money, and that<lb/>
at <del>the</del> <add>whatever</add> term, should any such time arrive, at<lb/>
which principal at the expence of further<lb/>
interest, <del>was</del> <add>came to be</add> the thing wanted: – <del>and</del> <add>of which mass</add> consequently<lb/>
<del>would not</del> <add>not any part would</add> be <hi rend="underline">sunk</hi>.</p>
<p>In what <add><del><gap/></del> conceivable</add> state of<lb/>
things would the supposition thus <add>so</add> lightly <add><unclear>its</unclear></add> made, be<lb/>
<del>susceptible of quadrating</del> realized?<lb/>
<del>quadrate with the fact?</del>  If there were but<lb/>
one Annuity Note taken out, certainly: – not <del>absolutely</del><lb/>
<add>certainly</add> if there were <hi rend="underline">two</hi> Annuity Notes taken out<lb/>
<add>at different times</add> by so many different individuals.  If Aº 1803<lb/>
on the first of January, <add>a whimsical man (whom we will call</add> A) took a fancy to become<lb/>
possessor of an Annuity Note (say a Hundred<lb/>
Note price £12:16) and took one out accordingly,<lb/>
<del>never</del> nobody else ever taking out<lb/>
another – then <add>indeed</add> would there be hoarding without<lb/>
circulation – and consequently <add>there <del>without</del> would be</add> <hi rend="underline">sinking</hi>:  but<lb/>
if <del>Aº</del> <add>in the year</add> 1804, the same day of the same month<lb/>
<add><del>in the next year</del></add> happened to produce another whimsical man<lb/>
<add>an acquaintance of A's</add> (whom we will call B) at the same time that<lb/>
A being <del>cured of his whimsy</del> <add>tired of his bargain</add>, or wanting to<lb/>
<add>spend</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:51, 8 July 2024

Click Here To Edit

Annuity Notes

But of the whole of the mass – be it great or
small – be in every part of it alike susceptible (as it really is would be)
of circulation, then whatever part has may have been employed
in the purchase of an Annuity, i:e:
of interest so long as interest was the thing
wanted, would be susceptible of being put in
circulation, in the character shape of principal money, and that
at the whatever term, should any such time arrive, at
which principal at the expence of further
interest, was came to be the thing wanted: – and of which mass consequently
would not not any part would be sunk.

In what conceivable state of
things would the supposition thus so lightly its made, be
susceptible of quadrating realized?
quadrate with the fact? If there were but
one Annuity Note taken out, certainly: – not absolutely
certainly if there were two Annuity Notes taken out
at different times by so many different individuals. If Aº 1803
on the first of January, a whimsical man (whom we will call A) took a fancy to become
possessor of an Annuity Note (say a Hundred
Note price £12:16) and took one out accordingly,
never nobody else ever taking out
another – then indeed would there be hoarding without
circulation – and consequently there without would be sinking: but
if in the year 1804, the same day of the same month
in the next year happened to produce another whimsical man
an acquaintance of A's (whom we will call B) at the same time that
A being cured of his whimsy tired of his bargain, or wanting to
spend


Identifier: | JB/003/377/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

377

Info in main headings field

annuity notes

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

1787

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in