JB/034/149/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/149/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/149/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/149/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
75. If by way burn wins nirb you im in really why turned im ink could be to due the mother 4 the inbound im and new removed : for on that bus apprentice the yuma Ireland and the ofermin underland lrug on every occasion eventually the fave the affirmation of form in allogeller would : and knowing the ethos of caring it to be beloved that the firm of law in contempt in the but too mindful and car. im to care bringing i h b in ambassador dead if can melted by the individuals when it for found with the blunder, it is thoroughly much form than miley.  
<p>1823. Sept<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 4<lb/>
Cyrus
<head>Constitutional Code.</head></p>
 
<p>7 5.  If by any person any such opinion was really entertained<lb/>
 
his wish would be to see the necessity of the <gap/> concurrence<lb/>
removed: for on that <add>his</add> supposition the <del><gap/></del> opinion<lb/>
declared and the opinion entertained being on every occasion<lb/>
necessarily <add>constantly</add> the same the appearance of force is altogether<lb/>
useless: and knowing the effect of causing it to be believed that<lb/>
the force of law is <add>constantly</add> employed in the but too successful endeavour<lb/>
to cause perjury to be to an unbounded extent, <del><gap/></del> committed<lb/>
by those individuals whom it has forced into this<lb/>
situation, it is thereby much worse than useless.</p>
<p>8. 6.  The opinion <del>that the</del> on which <add>depends</add> the efficiency of the<lb/>
ceremony <del>is the</del> as to the application of the force of the religious<lb/>
sanction to ensure <del>the prof</del> against violation this <unclear>premise</unclear><lb/>
which to the knowledge of every one is continually violated is –<lb/>
that the Almighty is <add>holds himself</add> in constant readiness to <unclear>conform</unclear> his<lb/>
conduct to the will thus formed and declared by the human<lb/>
rulers:  in readiness just as in English law procedure the Sheriff<lb/>
holds himself in readiness to give execution and effect to the will<lb/>
officially declared by the Judge.  If it be <unclear>used</unclear> – <unclear>no</unclear> not to a<lb/>
certainty for in this case the Almighty power would be in a <gap/><lb/>
of absolute subjection to the human – not to a certainty – only<lb/>
to a probability – the option <del>of</del> in regard to execution being still<lb/>
left subject to his pleasure the absurdity in what degree soever<lb/>
lessened can never be thus <add>altogether</add> removed.  For so long as by men<lb/>
such form of words uttered by many any <del><gap/></del> the smallest degree<lb/>
of influence can be exercised with effect on the will of the Almighty,<lb/>
the superiority of man over the Almighty in that<lb/>
instance remains declared.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:13, 19 July 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823. Septr. 4
Constitutional Code.

7 5. If by any person any such opinion was really entertained
his wish would be to see the necessity of the concurrence
removed: for on that his supposition the opinion
declared and the opinion entertained being on every occasion
necessarily constantly the same the appearance of force is altogether
useless: and knowing the effect of causing it to be believed that
the force of law is constantly employed in the but too successful endeavour
to cause perjury to be to an unbounded extent, committed
by those individuals whom it has forced into this
situation, it is thereby much worse than useless.

8. 6. The opinion that the on which depends the efficiency of the
ceremony is the as to the application of the force of the religious
sanction to ensure the prof against violation this premise
which to the knowledge of every one is continually violated is –
that the Almighty is holds himself in constant readiness to conform his
conduct to the will thus formed and declared by the human
rulers: in readiness just as in English law procedure the Sheriff
holds himself in readiness to give execution and effect to the will
officially declared by the Judge. If it be usedno not to a
certainty for in this case the Almighty power would be in a
of absolute subjection to the human – not to a certainty – only
to a probability – the option of in regard to execution being still
left subject to his pleasure the absurdity in what degree soever
lessened can never be thus altogether removed. For so long as by men
such form of words uttered by many any the smallest degree
of influence can be exercised with effect on the will of the Almighty,
the superiority of man over the Almighty in that
instance remains declared.


Identifier: | JB/034/149/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

74-76

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

149

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / c3 / d22 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10423

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in