★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/036/146/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/036/146/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1820 Oct. 1.<lb/> | |||
<!-- pencil --><head>Judge Hermosa</head></p> | |||
<p><del>The <add>principles</add> cause of <gap/> Justice defended against the <add>this</add> service <gap/> again<lb/> | |||
by <gap/> <gap/>, Judge of Instruction in the case of<lb/> | |||
the Cadiz Massacre</del></p> | |||
<p><del>Sir <add>Remarks on Coronel Fiscal Gaspar Hermosa in</add> Necessity of a Code of Judicial Procedure opposite to <unclear>our</unclear><lb/> | |||
principles opposite to those of the existing Rome-bred Law: illustrated<lb/> | |||
by Remarks in the Reports made <add>dated</add> 20<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> August 1820 by<lb/> | |||
<add>Sir, People of Spain</add>Coronel Fiscal Gaspar Hermosa Judge of Instruction in the case<lb/> | |||
of the Cadiz Massacre.</del></p> | |||
<p>Complaints <del>are</del> <add>I observe have been</add> made <del>against the Judge of Instruction</del><lb/> | |||
of the delay <del>by which</del> experienced in the case of the Cadiz<lb/> | |||
Massacre, <del>If</del> a paper signed <add>according to <del><gap/></del> the English Translation</add> Sanlucas de Barrameda<lb/> | |||
20<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> August 1820 the Judge of Instruction Coronel Fiscal<lb/> | |||
Gaspar Hermosa, the professed object is – to satisfy the Spanish<lb/> | |||
people that from this delay <del>no inferences are justly deducible <add>misconduct is justly imputable</add><lb/> | |||
to the prejudice of the regulation of</del> <add>misconduct, is not in any shape justly imputable to</add> that Judge. The business<lb/> | |||
in question is the business of the day. But <del>out of this</del> on the<lb/> | |||
occasion of this business, I see principles <unclear>avoured</unclear>, the influence<lb/> | |||
of which <del><gap/></del> is of as lasting a nature as that of the system of law<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> of which they <unclear>make</unclear> a part and from which they were imbibed.</p> | |||
<p>"I remind the public" (says this Judge) "I remind the public<lb/> | |||
"that <hi rend="underline">delay</hi> in judicial proceedings is a <hi rend="underline">tribute</hi> which is<lb/> | |||
"due to justice, and as it were the <hi rend="underline">price</hi> at which the security<lb/> | |||
"of the Citizen is purchased: that the <hi rend="underline">judicial forms<lb/> | |||
"are</hi> <del>had been said</del> <add>(if instead of <hi rend="underline">are</hi> he had said</add> <hi rend="underline">ought to be</hi> his proposition would<lb/> | |||
"have <del>been rather more</del> stood rather clearer of dispute) "and<lb/> | |||
"the judicial forms <hi rend="underline">are</hi> the shields of liberty, and <hi rend="underline">precipitation</hi><lb/> | |||
"the most dangerous <del>evil</del> <add>rock</add> in the way of justice.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1820 Oct. 1.
Judge Hermosa
The principles cause of Justice defended against the this service again
by , Judge of Instruction in the case of
the Cadiz Massacre
Sir Remarks on Coronel Fiscal Gaspar Hermosa in Necessity of a Code of Judicial Procedure opposite to our
principles opposite to those of the existing Rome-bred Law: illustrated
by Remarks in the Reports made dated 20th August 1820 by
Sir, People of SpainCoronel Fiscal Gaspar Hermosa Judge of Instruction in the case
of the Cadiz Massacre.
Complaints are I observe have been made against the Judge of Instruction
of the delay by which experienced in the case of the Cadiz
Massacre, If a paper signed according to the English Translation Sanlucas de Barrameda
20th August 1820 the Judge of Instruction Coronel Fiscal
Gaspar Hermosa, the professed object is – to satisfy the Spanish
people that from this delay no inferences are justly deducible misconduct is justly imputable
to the prejudice of the regulation of misconduct, is not in any shape justly imputable to that Judge. The business
in question is the business of the day. But out of this on the
occasion of this business, I see principles avoured, the influence
of which is of as lasting a nature as that of the system of law
of which they make a part and from which they were imbibed.
"I remind the public" (says this Judge) "I remind the public
"that delay in judicial proceedings is a tribute which is
"due to justice, and as it were the price at which the security
"of the Citizen is purchased: that the judicial forms
"are had been said (if instead of are he had said ought to be his proposition would
"have been rather more stood rather clearer of dispute) "and
"the judicial forms are the shields of liberty, and precipitation
"the most dangerous evil rock in the way of justice.
|
Identifier: | JB/036/146/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 36. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1822-07-16 |
|||
|
036 |
constitutional code rationale |
||
|
146 |
constitut. code rationale |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::i&m [fleur de lys] 1818]] |
||
|
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
|
1818 |
|||
|
11070 |
|||
