JB/041/022/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/041/022/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/041/022/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/022/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/022/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825 Dec 3<lb/>
<head>1825 Dec 3 + 5 </head> <head>Constitutional Code copd</head> <note>Ch. XIII Immediate Judge §2 Outdoor <del>attendance</del> <add>Duty.</add></note><lb/>
<head>Constitutional Code </head> <note>Ch. XIII Immediate Judges<lb/>
 
&sect;. 2 Outdoor <del>attendance</del> <add>Duty.</add><lb/>
<p>Art. 6. <del>In this case</del> <add><del>To give the decision this advantage</del></add> the Judge by whom the decision<lb/> is framed must be the <del><gap/></del> <add><del>person</del> same Judge</add> by whom the visit to the spot has<lb/> <add>been</add> made <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <lb/>formed, or the advantage in question will not have been <lb/><gap/>: <del>the Judge principal</del> of it to be the Judge principal that<lb/> the decision is to be framed. <del>In a <gap/> to</del> by the Judge principal<lb/> <del>that the visit was</del> <add>must the visit <del><gap/></del> have been</add> made: if it be a Judge <sic>Deputi</sic> by that same<lb/> Judge <sic>Deputi</sic>. A case may be in which it may be of<lb/> advantage <unclear>upon the whole that </unclear> <del><gap/></del>the <gap/> and inspecting <lb/>Judge be a person other than the deciding Judge: but in this <del>cas</del> <add>case</add> <lb/>the advantage if any, <del>can not</del> <add>will consist</add> in the <del>defensive</del> <add>superiority</add> in review of<lb/>
Copied</note></p>
 
<p>Art. 6. <del>In this case</del> <add><del>To give the decision this advantage</del></add> the Judge by whom the decision<lb/>
 
is framed must be the <del><gap/></del> <add><del>person</del> same Judge</add> by whom the visit to the spot has<lb/><add>been</add> made <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>
 
formed, or the advantage in question will not have been <lb/>
 
reaped: <del>the Judge principal</del> if it to be the Judge principal that<lb/>
 
the decision is to be framed, <del>In a <gap/> to</del> by the Judge principal<lb/>
 
<del>that the visit was</del> <add>must the visit <del><gap/></del> have been</add> made: if it be a Judge Depute by that same<lb/>
 
Judge Depute. A case may be in which it may be of<lb/>
 
advantage upon the whole that <del><gap/></del> the visiting and inspecting<lb/>
 
Judge be a person other than the deciding Judge: but in this <del>cas</del> <add>case</add><lb/>
 
the advantage if any, <del>can not</del> <add>will consist</add> in the <del>defensive</del> <add>superiority</add> in respect of<lb/>
 
<del>trustworthiness between the evidence of testimony of the visiting and<lb/>
 
inspecting Judge with or without such other forbearing in the <add>of any</add><lb/>
 
individual <gap/> happens to afford, and the such other evidence<lb/>
 
testimony if any taken by <gap/> itself.</del><lb/>
 
trustworthiness on the part of the report made by the visiting to<lb/>
 
the deciding Judge in comparison of the report that would<lb/>
 
have been made by other <add>alledged percipient</add> witneses, or in the addition made<lb/>
 
by the report of that same visiting Judge to the reports made<lb/>
 
by other <del><gap/></del> alledged percipient witnesses.</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:35, 19 August 2024

'Click Here To Edit

1825 Dec 3
Constitutional Code Ch. XIII Immediate Judges
§. 2 Outdoor attendance Duty.
Copied

Art. 6. In this case To give the decision this advantage the Judge by whom the decision
is framed must be the person same Judge by whom the visit to the spot has
been made
formed, or the advantage in question will not have been
reaped: the Judge principal if it to be the Judge principal that
the decision is to be framed, In a to by the Judge principal
that the visit was must the visit have been made: if it be a Judge Depute by that same
Judge Depute. A case may be in which it may be of
advantage upon the whole that the visiting and inspecting
Judge be a person other than the deciding Judge: but in this cas case
the advantage if any, can not will consist in the defensive superiority in respect of
trustworthiness between the evidence of testimony of the visiting and
inspecting Judge with or without such other forbearing in the of any
individual happens to afford, and the such other evidence
testimony if any taken by itself.

trustworthiness on the part of the report made by the visiting to
the deciding Judge in comparison of the report that would
have been made by other alledged percipient witneses, or in the addition made
by the report of that same visiting Judge to the reports made
by other alledged percipient witnesses.


Identifier: | JB/041/022/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1825-12-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

022

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D5 / E5

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

[[notes_public::Copd [note not in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in