JB/106/324/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/324/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/324/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/324/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1821 June 2<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil -->To Carvaho</p>
 
<p><del>Not long ago</del> At our first interview I believe it was<lb/>
 
with D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/>Roden, <del>he dropt</del> something dropped from <unclear>him</unclear><lb/>
 
about a <add>proposed</add> correspondence on my part with some public<lb/>
man or other at Lisbon, mentioning, I believe, though<lb/>
without designation of names, some Member <add>or other</add> of the Cortes.<lb/>
The tendency of my answer was <del>rather</del> I believe rather<lb/>
declinatory:  not but that, <del>were I</del> <add>supposing myself</add> sufficiently at liberty<lb/>
it would be perhaps the most interesting correspondence<lb/>
I could have, but that, the correspondence between Lisbon<lb/>
and London being already in his hands, it did not<lb/>
appear to <del>be</del> me how <del>at</del> on this <add>side</add> of the water it could<lb/>
be on any better.  By the further acceptance <add>made</add> with<lb/>
his habits <del>I have been led to look at the matter</del> <add>as above, this notion has undergone <del>the</del> a correspondent <unclear>alternation</unclear> <del>which</del> with</add><lb/>
<del>in a <gap/> different point of view:  <gap/> I do <add>can</add></del> <add><del>you are <gap/> proposed for I rendered</del> any further insist on</add><lb/>
<del>not lost upon as among the most conspicuous of hesitance.</del><lb/>
I wish this therefore to say, Sir, that, not liking<lb/>
the thought of depriving your country <del>of any possession so</del> <add>even supposing it <del>practicable</del> in my power,</add><lb/>
<del>valuable be it as your time,</del> <add>of any portion of a time such as yours</add> if it be agreeable to you<lb/>
to pitch upon some <del>other</del> person <add>near you</add> whose sentiments I<lb/>
might look upon as yours, and to say so to me accordingly<lb/>
it would be a real pleasure to me to receive<lb/>
<del>his</del> <add>your</add> commands <add>through him</add> and pay obedience to them in<lb/>
every thing in my power:  always on the supposition<lb/>
that the correspondence had for its object some <del>determinate<lb/>
<gap/></del> <add>practical</add> measures on the occasion of which I<lb/>
<del>may</del> <add>might</add> entertain a hope of rendering my services useful<lb/>
to <del>your country as some</del> <add>Portugal, in this or that</add> determinate shape.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:55, 2 September 2024

Click Here To Edit

1821 June 2
To Carvaho

Not long ago At our first interview I believe it was
with Dr Roden, he dropt something dropped from him
about a proposed correspondence on my part with some public
man or other at Lisbon, mentioning, I believe, though
without designation of names, some Member or other of the Cortes.
The tendency of my answer was rather I believe rather
declinatory: not but that, were I supposing myself sufficiently at liberty
it would be perhaps the most interesting correspondence
I could have, but that, the correspondence between Lisbon
and London being already in his hands, it did not
appear to be me how at on this side of the water it could
be on any better. By the further acceptance made with
his habits I have been led to look at the matter as above, this notion has undergone the a correspondent alternation which with
in a different point of view: I do can you are proposed for I rendered any further insist on
not lost upon as among the most conspicuous of hesitance.
I wish this therefore to say, Sir, that, not liking
the thought of depriving your country of any possession so even supposing it practicable in my power,
valuable be it as your time, of any portion of a time such as yours if it be agreeable to you
to pitch upon some other person near you whose sentiments I
might look upon as yours, and to say so to me accordingly
it would be a real pleasure to me to receive
his your commands through him and pay obedience to them in
every thing in my power: always on the supposition
that the correspondence had for its object some determinate
practical measures on the occasion of which I
may might entertain a hope of rendering my services useful
to your country as some Portugal, in this or that determinate shape.


Identifier: | JB/106/324/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1821-06-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

codification proposal (codification offer)

Folio number

324

Info in main headings field

to carvalho

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

c1 / d5 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

349910052

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in