JB/106/337/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/337/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/337/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/337/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Greece.  J.B. Observations on particular Articles</head></p>
 
<p>Now then as to the Operative <add>department</add>, it is <del>if in effect divided into</del> <add>by the necessity of the case that it <del>is</del><lb/>
 
stands divided as above, into the</add> two departments <del>the legislative <add>namely those</add> which are in use to be designated<lb/>
 
by the appellation</del> <add>stiled</add> the legislative and the Executive.<lb/>
Note that <add>of</add> these two departments <del>are</del> <add>the Executive is</add> to be understood as being<lb/>
<del>with which  to one another coordinates.  Now it is matter</del> <add>coordinate with the legislative <del>any</del> any more than the legislative alone or <del>both</del><lb/>
the legislative and the Executive taken</add> together are to be regarded as coordinate with the Constitutive.  No.<lb/>
it is <del>of</del> <add>matter of absolute</add> necessity that, with reference to one of them, namely the legislative,<lb/>
the other namely the Executive should be subordinate.  <add>For the</add> The legislative<lb/>
department being established, why is it that <del>the</del> <add>any part of the</add> business of the<lb/>
Operative department is committed to any functionary or set of functionaries<lb/>
other than those by which that of the legislative department is to<lb/>
be executed <add>done</add>?  Is it that the functionaries employed in the legislative<lb/>
department may find in another department a man or set of men<lb/>
by whose controul or obstruction in any shape may <add><del>create its</del> in any event</add> be opposed to their<lb/>
power? <add>a man or set of men</add> by whom the giving execution and effect to <del><gap/></del> <add>any</add> will, which they<lb/>
have concurred in the formation of, may be subject to <del><gap/></del> <add>frustration</add><lb/>
or even to delay?  No such thing.  The reason why that which is<lb/>
taken out of their hands, is <add>accordingly</add> taken out of their hands is – or at any<lb/>
rate the only reason – whether its being so can be justified, is – mostly<lb/>
this:  namely that when <del>all</del> the business, turned over, and as <del>to</del> it<lb/>
were turned down, to the Executive department <del><gap/></del> <add>has,</add> the whole of it been<lb/>
taken out of their hands as much as left in their hands <del>as</del> it<lb/>
is physically speaking, <add>supposing due attention paid to it,</add> possible for them to go through <del>a forbearance<lb/>
the <gap/></del> <add>indeed, as in the American</add> United States experience has amply <del><gap/></del> <add>shown,</add> more <del>then</del> <add>than</add><lb/>
they can do or can go <del>though</del> <add>through</add> without <add><unclear>continually</unclear></add> subjecting <del>a</del> large portions of it<lb/>
to a delay <del>from</del> <add>by</add> which serious inconvenience in particular in assignable<lb/>
shapes, is continually produced, <del>and by which</del> <add>as also</add> the ultimate<lb/>
<del>frustration</del> <add>frustration</add> of many a useful design, for want of the faculty of applying<lb/>
to it that <add>portion of</add> time, at the expiration of which, its original <del><gap/></del><lb/>
feasibility <del>would have</del> deserted it.  <add>In the Executive Department of that same Government</add> Look to the four Secretaries of<lb/>
State <del>in the Constitution of the Anglo American United States.</del> <add>acting immediately under the President.</add>  See their<lb/>
staggering, each of them, under the load of the business, which is continually<lb/>
<del><gap/> pressing on</del> <add>pouring in upon</add> their shoulders.  This done, <del><gap/> that business.</del> <add>conceive</add> the aggregate mass of<lb/>
their respective businesses<lb/>
added to the mass of<lb/>
business at present executed<lb/>
by the legislative<lb/>
assembly <del><gap/></del> stiled the<lb/>
Congress.  Say then whether the more <gap/> of the load of business, without any such design as that of dividing power between two sets of conflicting functionaries with opposite<hi rend="superscript">⊞1</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">⊞1</hi> interests and consequently opposite<lb/>
wills, has not been the true and<hi rend="superscript">⊞2</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> only beneficial effect <add>which has been</add> experienced,<lb/>
<del>at <gap/></del> from those arrangements <add>at least by</add> which<lb/>
the business of the Executive department<lb/>
has been placed in hands different from those which stand charged with the business of the legislative.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:48, 3 September 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823.
Greece. J.B. Observations on particular Articles

Now then as to the Operative department, it is if in effect divided into by the necessity of the case that it is
stands divided as above, into the
two departments the legislative namely those which are in use to be designated
by the appellation
stiled the legislative and the Executive.
Note that of these two departments are the Executive is to be understood as being
with which to one another coordinates. Now it is matter coordinate with the legislative any any more than the legislative alone or both
the legislative and the Executive taken
together are to be regarded as coordinate with the Constitutive. No.
it is of matter of absolute necessity that, with reference to one of them, namely the legislative,
the other namely the Executive should be subordinate. For the The legislative
department being established, why is it that the any part of the business of the
Operative department is committed to any functionary or set of functionaries
other than those by which that of the legislative department is to
be executed done? Is it that the functionaries employed in the legislative
department may find in another department a man or set of men
by whose controul or obstruction in any shape may create its in any event be opposed to their
power? a man or set of men by whom the giving execution and effect to any will, which they
have concurred in the formation of, may be subject to frustration
or even to delay? No such thing. The reason why that which is
taken out of their hands, is accordingly taken out of their hands is – or at any
rate the only reason – whether its being so can be justified, is – mostly
this: namely that when all the business, turned over, and as to it
were turned down, to the Executive department has, the whole of it been
taken out of their hands as much as left in their hands as it
is physically speaking, supposing due attention paid to it, possible for them to go through a forbearance
the
indeed, as in the American United States experience has amply shown, more then than
they can do or can go though through without continually subjecting a large portions of it
to a delay from by which serious inconvenience in particular in assignable
shapes, is continually produced, and by which as also the ultimate
frustration frustration of many a useful design, for want of the faculty of applying
to it that portion of time, at the expiration of which, its original
feasibility would have deserted it. In the Executive Department of that same Government Look to the four Secretaries of
State in the Constitution of the Anglo American United States. acting immediately under the President. See their
staggering, each of them, under the load of the business, which is continually
pressing on pouring in upon their shoulders. This done, that business. conceive the aggregate mass of
their respective businesses
added to the mass of
business at present executed
by the legislative
assembly stiled the
Congress. Say then whether the more of the load of business, without any such design as that of dividing power between two sets of conflicting functionaries with opposite⊞1
⊞1 interests and consequently opposite
wills, has not been the true and⊞2
only beneficial effect which has been experienced,
at from those arrangements at least by which
the business of the Executive department
has been placed in hands different from those which stand charged with the business of the legislative.


Identifier: | JB/106/337/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1823

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

337

Info in main headings field

greece jb observations on particular articles

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e7 / f11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34925

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in