★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/234/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/549/234/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1827 Oct. 11<lb/> | |||
<head>Penal Code or Law Amendment Propositions</head><note>Ch. II. Codification</note></p> | |||
<p>Quere viz <gap/> <gap/> &c</p> | |||
<p>In the character of standards of right and wrong, this<lb/> | |||
axiom and explanation with the correspondent principle<lb/> | |||
and rules will at any rate be intelligible: whether conformable<lb/> | |||
or no to the greatest happiness principle the reader will judge</p> | |||
<p>In default of such intelligible standard, divers others<lb/> | |||
altogether insignificant and nonsensical have hitherto been<lb/> | |||
in possession of being appointed <add>employed</add>, in argumentative discourse<lb/> | |||
especially when orally delivered in Parliament or elsewhere</p> | |||
<p>Nonsensical phrase the first every principle of justice<lb/> | |||
contrary to every principle of justice – what is proposed is<lb/> | |||
contrary to every principle of <unclear>justice</unclear>.</p> | |||
<p>Nonsensical phrase the second – the first principle of<lb/> | |||
justice – contrary to the first principles of justice what is proposed<lb/> | |||
is contrary to the first principle of justice</p> | |||
<p><del>The two pieces of <gap/></del> In one <add>this</add> point the two pieces of<lb/> | |||
nonsense agree <add>coincide</add>, and that is that there exists somewhere a<lb/> | |||
list of locutions <del><gap/></del> generally recognized in the character of<lb/> | |||
principles of justice.</p> | |||
<p>In <del>the case</del> and by the second phrase what is moreover<lb/> | |||
assumed is – that there are more than two of them.</p> | |||
<p>But a matter notorious and altogether undeniable is<lb/> | |||
that no such locutions are or ever have been in existence – committed<lb/> | |||
to black and while in any discourse that has anywhere<lb/> | |||
been committed to print</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1827 Oct. 11
Penal Code or Law Amendment PropositionsCh. II. Codification
Quere viz &c
In the character of standards of right and wrong, this
axiom and explanation with the correspondent principle
and rules will at any rate be intelligible: whether conformable
or no to the greatest happiness principle the reader will judge
In default of such intelligible standard, divers others
altogether insignificant and nonsensical have hitherto been
in possession of being appointed employed, in argumentative discourse
especially when orally delivered in Parliament or elsewhere
Nonsensical phrase the first every principle of justice
contrary to every principle of justice – what is proposed is
contrary to every principle of justice.
Nonsensical phrase the second – the first principle of
justice – contrary to the first principles of justice what is proposed
is contrary to the first principle of justice
The two pieces of In one this point the two pieces of
nonsense agree coincide, and that is that there exists somewhere a
list of locutions generally recognized in the character of
principles of justice.
In the case and by the second phrase what is moreover
assumed is – that there are more than two of them.
But a matter notorious and altogether undeniable is
that no such locutions are or ever have been in existence – committed
to black and while in any discourse that has anywhere
been committed to print
Identifier: | JB/549/234/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-10-11 |
1-3 |
||
549 |
|||
234 |
Penal Code or Law Amendment Proposal |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
|||
Jeremy Bentham |
|||